Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Darvadstrocel shows 48.8% combined remission in Crohn's perianal fistulas, not superior to placeboDarvadstrocel showed no better results than placebo for Crohn's disease fistulas

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that darvadstrocel did not show a statistically significant benefit over placebo for combined remission in Crohn's perianal fistulas at 24 weeks.

This Phase 3, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial evaluated darvadstrocel, a dispersion of 120 × 10 stem cells in 24 mL sterile buffered solution, in adults with Crohn's disease and complex perianal fistulas with ≤2 internal openings and ≤3 external openings and inadequate response to immunosuppressive agents or biologics. The study enrolled 568 patients randomized 1:1 to darvadstrocel (n=283) or placebo (n=285) across sites in Europe, Israel, and North America, with a follow-up to week 24.

The primary outcome was combined remission (closure of all treated external openings and absence of collections >2 cm) at week 24. This occurred in 138 of 283 patients (48.8%) in the darvadstrocel group versus 132 of 285 (46.3%) in the placebo group. The estimated treatment difference was 2.4% (95% CI, -5.8 to 10.6; P = .571), indicating no statistically significant difference. Secondary outcomes of clinical remission at week 24 and time to clinical remission also showed no significant differences (P = .515 and P = .374, respectively).

Safety was similar between groups. Treatment-emergent adverse events were experienced by 203 of 278 patients (73.0%) receiving darvadstrocel and 201 of 274 (73.4%) receiving placebo. No new safety signals were identified for darvadstrocel. Serious adverse events and discontinuations were not reported.

Key limitations include the lack of reported funding or conflicts, and the study population was specific to patients with inadequate response to prior therapies. The findings suggest that darvadstrocel does not offer a statistically significant advantage over placebo for achieving combined remission in this patient population at 24 weeks.

People with Crohn's disease often face painful fistulas that do not heal with standard drugs. This large study tested darvadstrocel, a stem cell product, against a placebo to see if it could help close these openings. The trial involved 568 adults across Europe, Israel, and North America who had complex fistulas and had not responded to other treatments. The main goal was to see if the stem cell treatment led to better healing at 24 weeks. The results showed that 48.8% of patients in the darvadstrocel group achieved closure compared to 46.3% in the placebo group. This small difference was not statistically significant. In plain terms, the treatment did not work better than the inactive substance used for comparison. Neither group saw a meaningful improvement in how quickly healing occurred. Safety was also monitored closely. Side effects were rare and happened at similar rates for both groups. No new safety concerns were found. The study was well designed with strict controls. Yet the outcome suggests this specific stem cell therapy does not offer a clear advantage over doing nothing for this condition. Patients and doctors should weigh this neutral result carefully before considering this option.

What this means for you:
Darvadstrocel did not show better healing than placebo for Crohn's fistulas in this trial.

Study Details

Study typeRct
Sample sizen = 283
EvidenceLevel 2
PublishedJun 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND & AIMS: The ADMIRE CD trial demonstrated the efficacy and safety of darvadstrocel in patients with complex perianal fistulas from Europe and Israel. The efficacy and safety of darvadstrocel in an expanded patient population was investigated. METHODS: ADMIRE CD II (ClinicalTrials.gov, Number: NCT03279081) was a phase 3, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial conducted in Europe, Israel, and North America. Adults with Crohn's disease and complex perianal fistulas with ≤2 internal openings and ≤3 external openings and inadequate response to immunosuppressive agents or biologics were randomized 1:1 to receive darvadstrocel (a dispersion of 120 × 10 stem cells in 24 mL sterile buffered solution) or placebo. Both groups underwent curettage and closure of the internal opening. The primary endpoint was combined remission (closure of all treated external openings and absence of collections >2 cm) at week 24. RESULTS: Overall, 568 patients were randomized to receive darvadstrocel (n = 283) or placebo (n = 285); 249 and 246, respectively, completed the trial. At week 24, combined remission was achieved in 138 of 283 (48.8%) patients in the darvadstrocel group and 132 of 285 (46.3%) in the placebo group (estimated treatment difference: 2.4%; 95% CI, -5.8 to 10.6; P = .571). There were no significant differences in key secondary endpoints for darvadstrocel vs placebo (clinical remission at week 24 [P = .515] and time to clinical remission [P = .374]). Treatment-emergent adverse events were infrequent and experienced by similar proportions of patients receiving darvadstrocel (203/278 [73.0%]) and placebo (201/274 [73.4%]). CONCLUSIONS: ADMIRE CD II did not meet its primary endpoint of combined remission at week 24, with no statistically significant difference between darvadstrocel and placebo. No new safety signals were identified for darvadstrocel. CLINICALTRIALS: gov, Number: NCT002209456.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.