Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Intravenous Recombinant Human Plasma Gelsolin Safety and Pharmacokinetics Evaluated in Phase 1 Trial of Healthy VolunteersCan this new IV drug be safely given? Early results show mild effects

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider Phase 1 safety data in healthy volunteers showing tolerability; efficacy in disease states was not assessed.

This Phase 1 randomized controlled trial investigated the safety profile and pharmacokinetics of intravenous recombinant human plasma gelsolin in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design. The study enrolled 32 healthy volunteers in a single-center setting. Participants received intravenous recombinant human plasma gelsolin at doses of 6, 12, 18, or 24 mg/kg or saline placebo.

Safety was the primary outcome measure. Ten subjects (41.7%) in the rhu-pGSN arm reported adverse events, compared to one subject (12.5%) in the placebo arm. Three subjects (12.5%) experienced an adverse event assessed as related to the study drug. All reported adverse events were classified as mild or moderate in severity with no discontinuations.

No serious adverse events occurred during the study period or follow-up. The median half-life of rhu-pGSN exceeded 14 h across all dosing regimens. Follow-up assessments continued through Day 28 to monitor for anti-rhu-pGSN antibodies and safety.

Key limitations include the study population consisting solely of healthy volunteers rather than patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Clinical efficacy in disease was not evaluated in this study. However, findings support once daily IV dosing in healthy subjects. The safety data suggest tolerability, but broader clinical application requires further investigation in target populations. Additional data are needed to confirm efficacy.

We always worry about new medicines causing more harm than good. Before doctors can use a drug, they need to know it won't really hurt the people taking it. This study looked at a new medication called recombinant human plasma gelsolin to see if it is safe.

Researchers gave the drug to 32 healthy volunteers using an IV line very carefully. They compared it against a saline placebo solution. Ten subjects in the drug group had some side effects during the study, but they were mild or moderate. Only one person in the placebo group felt anything at all.

No one had a completely serious reaction. The drug stayed in the body for more than 14 hours. Doctors saw no reason to stop people from taking it very carefully during the very long trial.

But here is the catch. This was just a first step in testing. The study did not test sick patients with lung injuries. We do not know if the drug helps treat illness. It only tells us it really seems really safe for now. We need to wait for more data in the future.

What this means for you:
This new drug showed mild side effects in healthy people, but we do not know if it treats disease.

Study Details

Study typeRct
Sample sizen = 3
EvidenceLevel 2
PublishedMar 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BackgroundPlasma gelsolin (pGSN) is a non-immunosuppressive anti-inflammatory immunomodulator with demonstrated efficacy in animal models of acute lung injury. Its potential role in moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is currently under investigation. MethodsWe conducted a phase 1, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of recombinant human pGSN (rhu-pGSN) following intravenous (IV) administration to healthy volunteers. Thirty-two participants were assigned to 4 sequentially ascending dose cohorts (6, 12, 18, 24 mg/kg of body weight) to receive five IV infusions of rhu-pGSN or saline placebo. Each cohort includes 8 subjects randomized 3:1 with rhu-pGSN or placebo. Doses were administered at 0 hours, 12 hours, 36 hours, 60 hours, and 84 hours. The primary outcome is the incidence and severity of clinical and laboratory AEs regardless of causality. Secondary outcomes include the pharmacokinetics of IV rhu-pGSN and the presence of anti-rhu-pGSN antibodies at Day 28. ResultsOverall, 10 subjects (41.7%) who received rhu-pGSN reported a total of 13 adverse events (AEs), and 1 subject (12.5%) who received placebo reported an AE. All AEs were mild or moderate. AEs in system organ classes that were reported by 2 or more subjects in either arm were skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders (12.5% rhu-pGSN; 0% placebo), gastrointestinal disorders (8.3% rhu-pGSN; 0% placebo), and nervous system disorders (12.5% rhu-pGSN; 12.5% placebo). No AEs by preferred term were reported by more than 1 subject in either arm. Three subjects (12.5%) experienced an AE assessed as related to study drug. No serious AEs occurred, and no AEs led to study discontinuation, dose interruption/reduction, or death. There were no apparent between-treatment differences in laboratory abnormalities, vital signs, or electrocardiogram findings. ConclusionsOverall, in this study, IV rhu-pGSN (up to 24 mg/kg daily) appeared safe and well tolerated compared to placebo. The median half-life of rhu-pGSN exceeded 14 h across all dosing regimens, supporting once daily IV dosing in healthy subjects. Trial registrationThis study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov on 2023-03-29 under the registration identifier NCT05789745.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.