A narrative review examined Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols for patients undergoing orthognathic surgery. These protocols include multimodal pain management, hemorrhage control, nausea prevention, airway care, steroid use, and fluid management. The review looked at outcomes like opioid use, hospital stay length, and overall recovery. Results suggest ERAS can reduce opioid consumption, shorten hospital stays, and improve recovery. No safety concerns or adverse events were reported in this review. However, the study has important limitations. There is no single standardized ERAS protocol universally adopted for this surgery yet. The authors note that further research and a unified protocol with specific anesthesia guidelines are needed. This review provides insights into applying ERAS in orthognathic surgery and offers guidance for clinical practice. Readers should understand that while these protocols show promise, more work is required to standardize their use. This information helps clinicians consider options for improving patient outcomes in this specific surgical area.
ERAS protocols may reduce opioid use and shorten stays for patients undergoing orthognathic surgeryERAS protocols show promise for orthognathic surgery recovery
AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work
This narrative review evaluates the application of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols in patients undergoing orthognathic surgery. The scope covers multimodal analgesia, intraoperative hemorrhage control, prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting, airway management, glucocorticoid application, and perioperative fluid management. The authors synthesize findings indicating that ERAS can reduce opioid consumption, shorten hospital stays, and improve overall recovery. Specific effect sizes or absolute numbers were not reported in this source. The review does not provide data on adverse events or serious adverse events. Safety and tolerability details were not reported. The review provides insights into the application of ERAS in orthognathic surgery and offers guidance for clinical practice. It highlights that further research and the development of a unified protocol with standardized anesthesia management specifications are needed. The authors caution that no standardized ERAS protocol has been universally adopted for orthognathic surgery. This narrative review provides insights into the application of ERAS in orthognathic surgery and offers guidance for clinical practice.