Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Endovascular interventions reduce rebleeding risk versus endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection in gastric variceal hemorrhage

Endovascular interventions reduce rebleeding risk versus endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection in…
Photo by Paris Bilal / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider endovascular interventions for rebleeding reduction but weigh risks of ascites or hepatic encephalopathy.

This individual patient data meta-analysis evaluates endovascular interventions versus endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection for patients with cirrhosis and gastric variceal hemorrhage. The analysis included 1240 patients and assessed all-cause rebleeding as the primary outcome along with overall survival, ascites, and hepatic encephalopathy as secondary outcomes. Follow-up duration was not reported.

Endovascular interventions including balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt significantly reduced rebleeding compared to endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection. The subdistribution hazard ratio for rebleeding with balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration versus endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection was 0.15 with a 95% CI of 0.05-0.43 and a P value of .004. For transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt versus endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection, the subdistribution hazard ratio was 0.49 with a 95% CI of 0.27-0.89 and a P value of .019.

However, endovascular interventions carry specific safety risks. Balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration increased the risk of new-onset or worsening of pre-existing ascites with a subdistribution hazard ratio of 3.54 and a 95% CI of 1.31-9.55 (P = .013). Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt increased the risk of hepatic encephalopathy with a subdistribution hazard ratio of 8.84 and a 95% CI of 2.0-39.11 (P = .004). Survival benefit was not reported.

The authors highlight limitations including limited long-term outcome data, inconsistencies in reported trial outcomes, and significant heterogeneity in results particularly regarding transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt. Funding or conflicts were not reported.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
Sample sizen = 1,240
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedJun 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND & AIMS: There is no consensus on the optimal modality of secondary prophylaxis for gastric variceal (GV) bleeding in patients with cirrhosis. METHODS: Observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing endovascular interventions-balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO) and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS)-with endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection (ECI) were considered for the aggregate data meta-analysis. Individual patient data were collected from RCTs to perform an individual patient data meta-analysis in a propensity score-matched cohort. The primary outcome was comparison of the rates of all-cause rebleeding between ECI, BRTO, and TIPS. Secondary outcomes included overall survival, ascites, and hepatic encephalopathy. RESULTS: Fifteen studies (11 observational and 4 RCTs) comprising 1240 patients (ECI: 377, BRTO: 575, and TIPS: 288) were included in the aggregate data meta-analysis. In the individual patient data meta-analysis, both BRTO (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR], 0.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.05-0.43; P = .004) and TIPS (sHR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.27-0.89; P = .019) significantly reduced all-cause rebleeding compared with ECI, without survival benefit. BRTO was associated with a higher risk of new-onset or worsening of pre-existing ascites (sHR, 3.54; 95% CI, 1.31-9.55; P = .013); TIPS increased the risk of hepatic encephalopathy (sHR, 8.84; 95% CI, 2.0-39.11; P = .004) compared with ECI. Benefit in rebleeding reduction was most pronounced among patients with Child-Pugh class B cirrhosis. The analysis revealed limited long-term outcome data, inconsistencies in reported trial outcomes, and significant heterogeneity in results, particularly regarding TIPS. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular interventions (BRTO and TIPS) are superior to ECI for reducing all-cause rebleeding in patients with cirrhosis and gastric variceal hemorrhage. Larger studies with standardized end points and long-term outcomes are needed to clarify survival benefit and optimize treatment selection.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.