Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

CAM products associated with ACLF in 39.6% of patients with liver injury in retrospective cohort

CAM products associated with ACLF in 39.6% of patients with liver injury in retrospective cohort
Photo by Dmytro Vynohradov / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider CAM use and heavy metal contamination in patients presenting with acute liver injury.

A retrospective cohort study analyzed 91 consecutive patients presenting with complementary and alternative medicine (CAM)-related adverse events at a South Indian tertiary center between 2021 and 2023. The study examined 386 implicated CAM products. The primary outcome was acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) occurrence and mortality, compared against non-ACLF presentations.

Among all patients, 36 of 91 (39.6%) developed ACLF, representing a significantly increased risk (OR 5.20, P=0.004). Among patients with hepatic adverse events specifically, the ACLF rate was 41.9% (36/86). Mortality was substantially higher in patients who developed ACLF (14/36, 38.9%) compared to those who did not (6/55, 10.9%). Analysis of product contamination found heavy metals exceeding WHO limits, including mercury (34%), cadmium (25%), arsenic (21%), and lead (14%). Cadmium exposure above limits was associated with ACLF in 75.9% of cases versus 22.6% (P=0.004).

The study's main safety finding was that CAM-related adverse events could progress to the serious outcome of ACLF. Key limitations include the retrospective, observational design, which cannot establish causation, only association. The follow-up duration and specific patient comorbidities were not reported. The findings are relevant to practice in highlighting that patients presenting with liver injury should be systematically queried about CAM use, and that contaminated products may drive severe hepatic outcomes in this setting.

Study Details

Study typeCohort
EvidenceLevel 3
PublishedMar 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BackgroundComplementary and alternative medicine (CAM)-related hepatotoxicity is a growing global concern. We utilized multi-modal analysis to characterize CAM product safety and identify predictors of severe liver injury.MethodsThis retrospective study analyzed 386 CAM products from 91 consecutive patients (mean 4.2 products/patient) presenting with CAM-related adverse events at a tertiary center in South India (2021–2023). Product-level analyses characterize the CAM supply chain while patient-level analyses inform clinical outcome associations. Investigations included ingredient documentation, heavy metal quantification, and GC-MS compound profiling.ResultsThe mean patient age was 48.2 years (75.8% male). ACLF occurred in 39.6% of all patients (36/91) and 41.9% of those with hepatic adverse events (36/86), with associated mortality of 38.9% (14/36) compared to 10.9% (6/55) in non-ACLF presentations (OR 5.20, P = 0.004). Heavy metals exceeded WHO limits in many products: mercury (34%), cadmium (25%), arsenic (21%), and lead (14%). Cadmium exposure exceeding WHO limits showed a strong association with ACLF (75.9% vs 22.6%, P
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.