Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Splenic stiffness measurement shows high sensitivity for varices in children with non-cirrhotic portal hypertensionMeasuring Splenic Stiffness Helps Identify Dangerous Vein Enlargement in Children

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider splenic stiffness measurement as a noninvasive tool for varices in children with NCPH, but interpret with caution due to low-to-moderate certainty.

This systematic review and diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of splenic stiffness measurement (SSM) using transient elastography, 2D-shear wave elastography, or point-SWE/acoustic radiation force impulse for detecting clinically significant varices (CSV) in children with portal hypertension. The analysis included 1027 children, with 405 having chronic liver disease (CLD) and 171 having non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (NCPH). The reference standard was oesophagogastroduodenoscopy.

In children with NCPH, SSM showed high sensitivity of 92.5% (95% CrI 82.7%-97.0%) and moderate specificity of 80.3% (95% CrI 57.6%-92.7%) for detecting CSV. For CLD, sensitivity was 83.0% (95% CrI 69.9%-91.0%) and specificity was 75.7% (95% CrI 60.8%-85.2%). The certainty of evidence was moderate for sensitivity in NCPH but low for specificity in NCPH and for overall diagnosis in CLD.

The authors note that SSM's role in clinical pathways is not yet established due to the need for more aetiology-specific studies. Limitations include low certainty of evidence for several estimates. While SSM may offer a noninvasive alternative to endoscopy, its accuracy varies by underlying liver disease, and further research is needed before routine clinical adoption.

Doctors often need to check for enlarged veins in the throat and stomach, which can cause serious bleeding. This condition is common in children who have high blood pressure in the portal vein due to liver problems.

A study looked at a tool called splenic stiffness measurement. This test uses sound waves to measure how firm the spleen is. The goal was to see if this test could accurately find dangerous veins without needing invasive procedures.

The results showed that the test was very good at finding these issues in children with non-cirrhotic conditions. However, for children with more advanced liver disease, the results were less certain. While it is a helpful tool, doctors still need more data to be sure of its accuracy in every case.

Overall, this method provides a useful way to screen patients quickly. It may help doctors decide which children need closer monitoring or more intensive treatment for their liver conditions.

What this means for you:
Splenic stiffness tests are highly effective at finding dangerous veins in many children with portal hypertension.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
Sample sizen = 1,027
EvidenceLevel 1
Follow-up216.0 mo
PublishedJul 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of splenic stiffness measurement (SSM) for detecting clinically significant varices (CSV) in children with portal hypertension (PHTN), including non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (NCPH) and chronic liver disease (CLD). DESIGN: Systematic review and diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase and Scopus were searched from inception to 31 July 2025. No language or time limitations were applied. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included prospective and retrospective studies which had children (<18 years) with clinically, radiologically, biochemically or histologically diagnosed PHTN. The index test was SSM (transient elastography, 2D-shear wave elastography (SWE) or point-SWE/acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI)). The reference standard was oesophagogastroduodenoscopy. Studies with other reference standards, like liver biopsy, were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two reviewers independently extracted data. A Bayesian random-effects bivariate model was used to estimate summary sensitivity and specificity with 95% credible intervals (CrIs), and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed. Risk of bias was assessed using QUADAS-2, and certainty of evidence (COE) was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) approach. RESULTS: 21 studies were included in the systematic review and 14 (n=1027) were eligible for meta-analysis. For CLD (8 studies, n=405), summary sensitivity was 83.0% (95% CrI 69.9% to 91.0%) and specificity was 75.7% (60.8%-85.2%), showing low certainty for CSV. In NCPH (6 studies, n=171), sensitivity for CSV was 92.5% (82.7%-97.0%) and specificity was 80.3% (57.6%-92.7%), with moderate COE for sensitivity and low COE for specificity. CONCLUSIONS: SSM probably has high sensitivity and may have moderate specificity for detecting CSV in children with NCPH. In CLD, diagnostic accuracy remains uncertain due to low COE. Further well-designed, aetiology-specific studies are needed to establish the role of SSM in the clinical pathway. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42024579988.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.