Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Antenatal or intrapartum N-acetylcysteine may reduce severe neonatal morbidity and bronchopulmonary dysplasia ratesN-acetylcysteine May Improve Outcomes for Infants with Chorioamnionitis

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that while NAC may reduce neonatal morbidity, evidence is preliminary and requires larger randomized trials.

This systematic review evaluates the impact of antenatal or intrapartum N-acetylcysteine (NAC) on fetal and neonatal outcomes in the context of chorioamnionitis. The review synthesized data from 143 mother-infant dyads and 6 translational animal studies to assess clinical outcomes, biomarkers, and mechanistic pathways.

Key findings indicate that NAC may lead to improved delivery-room adaptation and lower rates of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). Additionally, the review noted reductions in inflammatory cytokines, oxidative stress, apoptosis, and microstructural brain injury. Animal models suggested that NAC may preserve cerebrovascular coupling. These findings suggest a potential protective role for NAC in neonatal outcomes associated with infection.

Several limitations were identified, including small sample sizes and heterogeneous protocols across the included studies. Some studies reported no or negative effects, and the evidence remains preliminary. Large multicenter randomized trials with standardized dosing and long-term neurodevelopmental follow-up are required before routine clinical implementation can be recommended.

How this fits prior evidence

This systematic review addresses a gap in the management of chorioamnionitis by exploring the role of N-acetylcysteine. It extends the clinical scope of N-acetylcysteine beyond its established use in respiratory conditions, such as COPD and cystic fibrosis, where it is used to reduce exacerbation risk. While previous evidence for chorioamnionitis focused on antibiotics like ampicillin-gentamicin to reduce infection risk, this review specifically evaluates the potential of NAC to improve neonatal outcomes and reduce bronchopulmonary dysplasia.

This review looked at how the substance N-acetylcysteine (NAC) affects babies and mothers during pregnancy or birth when infections like chorioamnionitis are present. The researchers looked at 143 mother-infant pairs and 6 animal studies to see if NAC could protect the baby's health.

In the studies reviewed, babies who received NAC showed lower rates of severe illness and fewer cases of a lung condition called bronchopulmonary dysplasia. The data also suggested that NAC might help with brain health and reduce inflammation and stress in the body. These findings were seen in both human and animal models.

However, the evidence is still early and limited. Many of the studies were small or used different methods, and some studies showed no clear benefit. Because the results are not yet consistent, doctors cannot recommend it as a standard treatment yet. More large, organized trials are needed to see if it works reliably for everyone.

What this means for you:
Early research shows potential benefits for infants, but more large studies are needed to confirm these results.

Common questions

What is N-acetylcysteine and how does it help?

N-acetylcysteine (NAC) is a substance studied for its ability to reduce inflammation and oxidative stress. In this review, it was linked to lower rates of severe neonatal morbidity and fewer cases of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in infants with infections like chorioamnionitis.

Is this treatment safe for babies?

The review reported no major safety concerns regarding the use of N-acetylcysteine. However, because the evidence is still preliminary and based on small sample sizes, it is not yet recommended as a routine clinical treatment.

Why isn't this used as a standard treatment yet?

The evidence is currently limited by small sample sizes and different protocols across studies. Doctors need more large, multi-center trials with standard dosing to confirm the results before it can be used routinely.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedSep 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Maternal chorioamnionitis (mCA) and intra-amniotic infection/inflammation (Triple I) are major causes of fetal inflammatory injury and are associated with preterm birth, white matter injury, cerebral palsy, bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), and necrotising enterocolitis (NEC). No established therapy directly targets the inflammatory and oxidative pathways underlying fetal neuroinjury. N-acetylcysteine (NAC), a glutathione precursor with antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties, has emerged as a potential adjunctive neuroprotective therapy, although human evidence remains limited. To evaluate fetal and neonatal outcomes associated with antenatal or intrapartum NAC administration in pregnancies complicated by mCA or Triple I. A systematic review was conducted using MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to December 23, 2025. Eligible studies included randomised controlled trials, prospective cohorts, non-randomised studies, and translational animal models evaluating NAC exposure in mCA or Triple I. Clinical outcomes, biomarkers, pharmacokinetics, and mechanistic pathways were synthesised narratively. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2, ROBINS-I, and SYRCLE tools. Ten studies met the inclusion criteria, including five human and six translational animal studies. Human evidence involved approximately 143 mother–infant dyads. NAC exposure was associated with preserved cerebrovascular coupling, improved delivery-room adaptation, reduced severe neonatal morbidity, and lower BPD rates without major safety concerns. Pharmacokinetic studies demonstrated rapid placental transfer and gestation-dependent neonatal clearance. Animal studies consistently showed reductions in inflammatory cytokines, oxidative stress, apoptosis, and microstructural brain injury. NAC demonstrates biologically plausible neuroprotective potential in mCA and Triple I; however, the evidence remains preliminary due to small sample sizes and heterogeneous protocols. However, some studies showed no or negative effects. Large multicenter randomised trials with standardised dosing and long-term neurodevelopmental follow-up are needed before routine clinical implementation can be recommended.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.