Qualitative study finds knowledge gaps and insurance concerns about prostate cancer genetic testing
This qualitative and survey study explored opinions, perceptions, expectations, and information needs regarding germline genetic testing for prostate cancer. Phase I involved focus group discussions with 20 men previously diagnosed with prostate cancer. Phase II involved reviewing a Precision Medicine in Prostate Cancer Information Toolkit with 14 patients, 4 carers/family members, and 14 healthcare providers.
Knowledge about precision medicine and genetic testing was generally low among participants. The strongest motivation for undertaking testing, reported by 7 participants, was to identify family members' risk levels. The biggest concern, reported by 5 participants, was insurance discrimination. Other concerns highlighted included implications for family and testing costs.
Healthcare providers (n=8) found the toolkit's purpose clearer than patients (n=5). Patients reported difficulty imagining the toolkit's usefulness at diagnosis or when assessing genetic risk beforehand. No safety or tolerability data were reported.
Key limitations include small sample sizes and the qualitative nature of the findings, which preclude causal inference. The study's practice relevance is that the toolkit may be helpful in addressing knowledge gaps, but the authors note further testing is needed to ensure its accessibility across different literacy and cultural contexts.