Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide shows favorable lipid and renal changes versus other regimens in treatment-experienced HIV-1 patientsNew review shows a specific HIV drug combo may improve cholesterol and kidney health

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider B/F/TAF as a safe option for long-term management in treatment-experienced people with HIV-1.

This systematic literature review and network meta-analysis evaluates bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF) against other antiretroviral therapy regimens in treatment-experienced people with HIV-1. The analysis followed participants for 48 weeks and assessed lipid profiles, renal function, and safety. B/F/TAF demonstrated favorable changes in total cholesterol and triglycerides compared to comparators, while maintaining similar adverse event and discontinuation rates. The authors support B/F/TAF as a safe option for long-term management in this population.

Regarding lipid outcomes, changes in total cholesterol (TC) favored B/F/TAF with a mean difference of -12.43 and a 95% CrI of [-23.26, -1.53]. Changes in triglycerides also favored B/F/TAF, with mean differences of -15.01 (95% CrI: [-29.18, -1.06]) and -24.48 (95% CrI: [-41.60, -7.47]). In contrast, changes in HDL favored NNRTI-based regimens with a mean difference of -4.35 (95% CrI: [-7.76, -0.70]). Changes in LDL and the TC to HDL ratio were similar between groups.

Renal function showed favorable changes for B/F/TAF, with an eGFR mean difference of 3.81 (95% CrI: [1.74, 5.97]). Safety profiles were generally comparable, with adverse events and discontinuations similar to other ART regimens. The regimen was generally well tolerated. The study did not report specific serious adverse events or absolute numbers for outcomes. Funding or conflicts were not reported. The review supports B/F/TAF as a safe option for long-term management in treatment-experienced people with HIV-1.

People living with HIV have many treatment options, but finding one that protects your heart and kidneys is vital. A new systematic review looked at data from many studies to compare a specific drug combination called bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide against other common regimens. This analysis focused on people who had already taken HIV medication before. The team tracked how these drugs affected blood fats and kidney function over 48 weeks. The results were promising for this specific combination. It showed better changes in total cholesterol and triglycerides compared to the other drugs tested. The review also noted that kidney function markers improved with this new option. Safety was a major part of the analysis. Participants generally had similar levels of side effects and discontinuations as those on other therapies. The drugs were generally well tolerated by the group. While the review did not report specific numbers for every single outcome, the overall direction of the data favored this new combination for heart and kidney health. This information helps doctors and patients choose a safe option for long-term management.

What this means for you:
This drug combo showed better cholesterol and kidney results with similar safety to other HIV treatments.

Study Details

Study typeSystematic review
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedJun 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
With modern antiretroviral therapy (ART), HIV-1 has now become a manageable chronic condition. Among treatment-experienced (TE) people with HIV-1 (PWH), ART regimens can influence metabolic and renal outcomes and adverse events such as nausea. Regimen selection increasingly prioritizes safety, tolerability and long-term acceptability. This study compared bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF) with other ART regimens in TE PWH using multilevel network meta-regression (ML-NMR), focusing on lipid profile, renal function and overall safety. A systematic literature review (SLR) in June 2023 identified Phase III/IV randomized controlled trials reporting safety in adult TE PWH. ML-NMR was conducted at week 48 adjusting for age, sex, race and CD4 cell count, using individual patient data from three Phase III B/F/TAF trials (GS-US-380-1844, -1878, -4030) and aggregate data from comparator trials. At week 48, B/F/TAF demonstrated similar changes in total cholesterol (TC) to HDL ratio and LDL versus comparators. Compared with NNRTI (+ or /) F/TDF, changes in TC favored B/F/TAF (mean difference [MD; 95% CrI]: -12.43 [-23.26, -1.53]), but favored the NNRTI-based regimen for HDL (-4.35 [-7.76, -0.70]). Triglycerides changes favored B/F/TAF versus DTG/ABC/3TC (-15.01 [-29.18, -1.06]) and protease inhibitor (+ or /) b + 2 NRTIs (-24.48 [-41.60, -7.47]). eGFR changes favored B/F/TAF versus DTG/ABC/3TC (3.81 [1.74, 5.97]). With some exceptions of statistical differences in both directions, B/F/TAF generally had similar levels of adverse events and discontinuations as other ART. Switching to or remaining on B/F/TAF in TE PWH was generally well tolerated and did not worsen lipid, renal or safety outcomes versus most other contemporary ART. Improvements in select lipid parameters and stable renal function, with low rates of adverse events and discontinuation, support B/F/TAF as a safe option for long-term management in TE PWH.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.