Contezolid Shows Lower CSF Concentrations Than Linezolid in Tuberculous Meningitis
This randomized prospective study compared the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pharmacokinetics and safety of contezolid versus linezolid in 10 patients with tuberculous meningitis. All patients received a background anti-TB regimen, with the intervention being a contezolid-containing regimen and the comparator being a linezolid-containing regimen. The primary outcome was CSF concentration and safety.
Linezolid achieved significantly higher CSF concentrations than contezolid at both 2 hours (median 3.251 µg/mL vs. 1.0806 µg/mL; p=0.008) and 6 hours (median 1.623 µg/mL vs. 0.7920 µg/mL; p=0.016). The mean CSF area under the concentration-time curve was also significantly higher for linezolid (12.537 µg·h/mL) than for contezolid (4.637 µg·h/mL; p=0.008). While contezolid concentrations exceeded the MIC of 0.5 µg/mL at 2 hours, they declined by 6 hours, whereas linezolid remained above the MIC in all samples at 6 hours. Blood concentrations were higher than CSF concentrations for both drugs.
No serious drug-related adverse events were reported, though detailed safety and tolerability data were not provided. This was a small pharmacokinetic study (n=10) that did not assess clinical efficacy outcomes, follow-up duration was not reported, and key limitations were not detailed. The study demonstrates differing CSF penetration but cannot inform comparative clinical effectiveness. Contezolid warrants further investigation, but current evidence does not support its use over linezolid for TBM based on these pharmacokinetic parameters alone.