Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Long-acting cabotegravir plus rilpivirine noninferior to oral dolutegravir for HIV viral suppressionLong-acting Injections Show Potential for HIV Treatment Management

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that long-acting cabotegravir plus rilpivirine is noninferior to oral dolutegravir for maintaining viral suppression.

This Phase 3b randomized trial enrolled 537 adults with virally suppressed HIV type 1 in Kenya, South Africa, and Uganda who exhibited suboptimal adherence or care engagement. The study compared intramuscular injections of cabotegravir (600 mg) plus rilp1irine (900 mg) every 8 weeks against daily oral dolutegravir-based therapy over a 48-week follow-up period.

For the primary outcome, 91.0% (244 of 268) of patients receiving long-acting injections achieved a viral load of less than 50 copies per milliliter at week 48, compared to 89.2% (240 of 269) in the oral group. The risk difference was 1.9 percentage points (95% CI, -3.1 to 6.9). Regarding secondary outcomes, confirmed virologic failure occurred in 1.9% (5) of the long-acting group versus 0% (0) of the oral group (95% CI, 0.3 to 3.5).

Safety data reported serious adverse events in 4.1% (11 of 271) of the long-acting group and 3.0% (8 of 269) of the oral group. A notable limitation of the study was that baseline drug-resistance testing was not performed. The study met the noninferiority margin of -10 percentage points, suggesting long-acting cabotegravir plus rilpivirine is a viable alternative for patients with adherence challenges.

How this fits prior evidence

How this fits prior evidence: This finding extends the evidence for long-acting cabotegravir-rilpivirine injections, which were previously shown to be superior to daily oral therapy for maintaining viral suppression in adolescents with HIV. While this trial confirms the efficacy of long-acting regimens in adults with adherence challenges, it differs from the prior finding that dolutegravir and lamivudine achieved 78% HIV-1 RNA suppression in patients with isolated reactive anti-HBc.

Researchers conducted a Phase 3b trial involving 537 adults living with HIV in Kenya, South Africa, and Uganda. The study compared a long-acting injection of cabotegravir and rilpivirine every eight weeks against a daily oral dose of dolutegravir. The goal was to see if the injection could maintain viral suppression for patients who might find it difficult to take a pill every day.

The results showed that 91.0% of people receiving the long-acting injections had a suppressed viral load at week 48, compared to 89.2% of those taking the daily oral medication. While the injection group had a slightly higher rate of virologic failure, the difference was small. The study met the primary goal of showing the injection was not inferior to the daily pill.

Safety data showed that 4.1% of the injection group experienced serious adverse events, compared to 3.0% in the oral group. Because the study did not perform baseline drug-resistance testing, the results should be viewed as part of a larger clinical picture. This trial suggests that long-acting injections are a viable option for maintaining viral suppression in specific settings.

What this means for you:
Long-acting injections were found to be noninferior to daily oral pills for maintaining HIV viral suppression.

Common questions

How does the long-acting injection compare to daily pills?

The trial showed that the long-acting injection was noninferior to daily oral therapy. Specifically, 91.0% of patients on the injection had a viral load under 50 copies per milliliter at week 48, while 89.2% of those on the daily oral medication achieved the same result.

Is the long-acting injection safe for patients?

In the study, 4.1% of patients receiving the long-acting injections experienced serious adverse events. In comparison, 3.0% of patients taking the daily oral medication experienced serious adverse events. You should discuss these specific safety figures with your doctor to understand what they mean for your care.

Who is this treatment intended for?

This study specifically looked at adults with virally suppressed HIV type 1 who have suboptimal adherence or care engagement. The results suggest the long-acting injection is a viable option for these patients who may find it difficult to take a pill every day.

Study Details

Study typeRct
Sample sizen = 540
EvidenceLevel 2
Follow-up1.8 mo
PublishedOct 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: In eastern and southern Africa, approximately 1 million people living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and receiving oral therapy do not have viral suppression because of adherence challenges. METHODS: We conducted a phase 3b, open-label, randomized trial to compare long-acting injectable cabotegravir plus rilpivirine with oral dolutegravir-based therapy among adults with virally suppressed HIV type 1 (viral load, <200 copies per milliliter) and suboptimal adherence or care engagement. The participants were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive intramuscular injections of cabotegravir (600 mg) plus rilpivirine (900 mg) every 8 weeks, with the first two injection visits occurring 4 weeks apart, or to continue daily oral dolutegravir-based therapy; baseline drug-resistance testing was not performed. The primary end point was a viral load of less than 50 copies per milliliter at week 48; noninferiority was assessed with a margin of -10 percentage points. Confirmed virologic failure (two consecutive viral loads of ≥200 copies per milliliter) was a key secondary end point. RESULTS: A total of 540 participants were enrolled across seven sites in Kenya, South Africa, and Uganda; 537 were included in the primary analysis. At 48 weeks, 244 of 268 participants (91.0%) in the long-acting-therapy group had a viral load of less than 50 copies per milliliter, as compared with 240 of 269 participants (89.2%) in the oral-therapy group (risk difference, 1.9 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -3.1 to 6.9), which met the criterion for noninferiority. The results of a per-protocol analysis were consistent with those of the primary analysis. Confirmed virologic failure occurred in 5 participants (1.9%) in the long-acting-therapy group and in no participants in the oral-therapy group (risk difference, 1.9 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.3 to 3.5). Serious adverse events were reported in 11 of 271 participants (4.1%) who received long-acting therapy and in 8 of 269 participants (3.0%) who received oral therapy (risk difference, 1.1 percentage points; 95% CI, -1.1 to 4.2). CONCLUSIONS: Among persons with HIV in Africa who have adherence challenges, long-acting cabotegravir plus rilpivirine was noninferior to oral dolutegravir-based therapy for maintaining a viral load of less than 50 copies per milliliter. (Funded by Johnson & Johnson; IMPALA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05546242; Pan African Clinical Trials Registry number, PACT202301600757432TMC278LAHTX3005.).
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.