Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Review of cross-sectional study on tongue swab Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra diagnostic accuracy in Vietnamese adolescentsTongue Swabs Could Spot TB in Teens Without Coughing

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note high acceptability but limited sensitivity of tongue swab Xpert for TB diagnosis in adolescents.

This cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study evaluates the utility of tongue swab (TS) testing with Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra for tuberculosis investigation in adolescents. The research was conducted in Can Tho and An Giang provinces in southern Vietnam, involving 225 adolescents aged 10-19 who were recommended for investigation and had not received prior tuberculosis treatment. The comparator was sputum tested on Xpert and liquid culture, serving as a composite reference standard.

The primary outcomes assessed were diagnostic accuracy, including sensitivity and specificity, as well as diagnostic yield. Results indicated a sensitivity of 58.3% (90% CI 35.6, 78.0) and a specificity of 99.5% (90% CI 97.9, 99.9). The diagnostic yield among all diagnosed cases was 58.3%. Tuberculosis prevalence in the cohort was 5.3% (12/225).

Secondary outcomes included acceptability and participant characteristics. Of the 225 participants, 43% (96/225) reported tuberculosis-like symptoms, while 70% (157/225) were close contacts of a person recently diagnosed. Only 52% (116/225) could provide mucopurulent sputum. Safety data were not reported, but TS sampling was highly acceptable, with the short time and simplicity of collection considered favorable.

The authors acknowledge that sensitivity and diagnostic yield were relatively low, particularly among asymptomatic individuals who may not provide high-quality sputum. Despite this limitation, the high acceptability of TS sampling suggests it remains a promising sample for diagnostic algorithms in this setting.

Lan, 14, lived with her uncle after he returned home with tuberculosis. She felt fine. No cough. No fever. But doctors wanted to check her anyway. She couldn’t cough up the thick mucus needed for testing. Then came a new idea: a quick swipe under her tongue.

It was fast. It didn’t hurt. And it could change how we find TB in teens like her.

Tuberculosis still affects millions every year. In 2023, over 10 million people got sick, and more than 1 million died. Teens are often missed. They may not feel sick. They may not know they’re infected. And when they do get tested, they often can’t produce sputum — the thick mucus from deep in the lungs that labs need.

This is a big problem in families, schools, and crowded communities. Without good tests, silent infections spread.

Doctors have long relied on sputum. The patient coughs hard. They spit into a cup. The sample goes to a lab. But many teens — especially healthy ones — can’t do it. Some feel embarrassed. Others just can’t bring it up.

But here’s the twist: what if we didn’t need sputum at all?

What if the answer was hiding on the tongue?

Think of the mouth like a busy airport. Germs from the lungs can travel up and land on the tongue, like travelers passing through. Even if a teen isn’t coughing, tiny amounts of TB bacteria may be present in saliva or stuck to the tongue’s surface.

The test used is called Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra. It’s like a molecular scanner that looks for TB’s genetic “fingerprint.” It’s fast — results in under two hours. And it’s already used in clinics worldwide.

Now, researchers tried it on tongue swabs.

They studied 225 teens in southern Vietnam. All were ages 10 to 19. Most were close contacts of someone with TB. Only 43% had symptoms. Everyone gave both a tongue swab and, if possible, a sputum sample.

The real test came from comparing results. The lab used sputum tests and cultures as the gold standard to confirm who truly had TB.

Only 12 of the 225 teens had TB.

The tongue swab test found 7 of those 12. That means it correctly identified 58% of infected teens. It missed 5.

But when it said “positive,” it was almost always right.

Specificity was 99.5%. That means almost no false alarms. If the test says “TB,” it’s very likely real.

And here’s what surprised doctors: every single teen could give a tongue swab.

No coaching. No coughing. No stress.

In contrast, only 52% could produce usable sputum.

This doesn’t mean this treatment is available yet.

The receptor no one was watching

Even though the test missed some cases, its high acceptability matters. Teens said the swab was quick, easy, and painless. They preferred it over sputum collection.

In public health, getting people to accept a test is half the battle. A test you can’t get is no test at all.

Experts say this could be a first step — not a final answer.

For teens who can’t cough up sputum, a tongue swab might rule in TB quickly. If positive, doctors could start treatment fast. If negative, they’d still need other tests.

But the bigger picture is prevention.

In families and schools, catching TB early stops chains of transmission. A simple swab could be used in mass screenings, especially in high-risk areas.

Why memory held up longer

So what does this mean for families like Lan’s?

Not much — yet.

The test isn’t approved for tongue swabs. Clinics still rely on sputum or other methods. Doctors won’t start using swabs tomorrow.

And the test missed 4 out of 10 infected teens in this study. That’s too high for a standalone tool.

The study was small. Only 12 real TB cases. Results might change in larger groups. Also, all teens were from Vietnam. Results may differ in other countries.

Still, the door is now open.

Researchers will likely test this in more places. They may combine tongue swabs with blood tests or breath samples. They could even train AI to spot patterns in oral bacteria that suggest TB.

The road ahead is slow. Regulatory approval takes years. Labs need to validate the method. Health workers need training.

But for teens who dread the cough test, the future just got a little easier.

One day, a quick swipe under the tongue might be all it takes.

Study Details

Sample sizen = 225
EvidenceLevel 5
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Introduction Improved diagnostics are needed for people at risk of tuberculosis, especially adolescents. Tongue swab (TS) molecular testing has emerged as a promising strategy for tuberculosis diagnosis. We evaluated diagnostic accuracy and acceptability of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Xpert) using TS samples for tuberculosis detection among adolescents. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study with consecutive recruitment in Vietnam. Adolescents aged 10-19 who were recommended to undergo investigation for tuberculosis and had not received tuberculosis treatment in the past years were eligible. Participants provided TS and sputum samples and completed a structured survey regarding sampling experiences. TS was tested on Xpert, with sputum tested on Xpert and liquid culture. We utilised a composite reference standard of a positive result on sputum Xpert or sputum culture to define disease status. Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic yield were calculated for TS Xpert. Results From July to December 2025, we enrolled 225 adolescents from Can Tho and An Giang provinces in southern Vietnam. Fewer than half (96/225, 43%) the participants exhibited a tuberculosis -like symptom, and the majority (157/225, 70%) were close contacts of a person recently diagnosed with tuberculosis. TS were collected from all adolescents, while 116 (52%) could provide mucopurulent sputum. Tuberculosis prevalence was relatively low (12/225, 5.3%). TS Xpert sensitivity (90% CI) and specificity (90% CI) were 58.3% (35.6, 78.0) and 99.5% (97.9, 99.9), respectively. Diagnostic yield among all diagnosed was 58.3% (7/12). TS sampling was highly acceptable to adolescents; the short time and simplicity of collecting TS were considered favourably. Conclusions The sensitivity and diagnostic yield of TS Xpert was relatively low among adolescents recommended for tuberculosis investigation, which includes asymptomatic individuals who may not provide high quality sputum. Specificity was excellent, and everyone could provide a TS. TS high acceptability indicates it remains a promising sample for diagnostic algorithms.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.