This is a systematic review of the relationship between noninvasive electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring and traditional invasive intracranial pressure (ICP) measurements in adult patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) in the intensive care unit setting. The review's scope was to synthesize existing evidence on this topic.
The authors identified a paucity of evidence. Only three studies specifically reported on the incidence of post-traumatic seizures in relation to ICP, and one study reported on the directional relationship between EEG activity and ICP. No pooled effect sizes, absolute numbers, or statistical significance were reported for these findings.
The review's primary limitation, as noted by the authors, is the limited number of studies investigating the relationship between EEG and ICP. The authors state that integration of noninvasive advanced monitoring modalities to understand intracranial processes is mandatory, but this is a practice relevance statement, not a finding from the synthesized evidence.
Given the limited evidence, the clinical relevance for routine practice remains uncertain. The review underscores the need for more robust studies to clarify the potential role of EEG monitoring in TBI management.
View Original Abstract ↓
Intracranial pressure (ICP) driven treatment of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) remains a continuous challenge. Patients are sedated and therapy focuses on preventing secondary injury caused by an increase in ICP and reduction of cerebral blood flow (CBF). While ICP-monitoring provides valuable information on secondary deterioration, it offers limited insight into the complex and dynamic intracranial processes following TBI and carries the risk of complications (hemorrhage, infections). Integration of noninvasive advanced monitoring modalities to understand this process is mandatory. Electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring provides an advanced noninvasive method to measure focal cerebral electrical activity in real-time and is particularly sensitive to cortical oxygen and metabolic deficits. Investigations of the relationship between disruptions in EEG patterns and traditional invasive ICP measurements could provide valuable insights into the pathophysiology of intracranial hypertension and may pave the way for using continuous EEG in future ICP management. To date, no systematic review has evaluated the relationship between EEG and ICP in adult patients with TBI. This systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA-guidelines. Three studies specifically reported on the incidence of post-traumatic seizures and ICP, and one study reported on a directional relationship between EEG activity and ICP. Altogether, there is a paucity of evidence and studies investigating the relationship between EEG and ICP. This highlights the need for systematic, well-powered research to clarify their interplay and underlying pathophysiology.