Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Robot-assisted gait training improves walking ability and functional independence in spinal cord injury

Robot-assisted gait training improves walking ability and functional independence in spinal cord…
Photo by Tom Claes / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider robot-assisted gait training as a beneficial adjunct to conventional rehabilitation for improving walking ability in spinal cord injury.

This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies on robot-assisted gait training for persons with spinal cord injury. The analysis pooled data from 241 participants and compared robot-assisted training to conventional rehabilitation.

The authors found a significant improvement in the 6-minute walk test distance with robot-assisted training (SMD = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.12–1.03, p = 0.01). They also found a significant improvement in the Spinal Cord Injury Walking Index II score (SMD = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.13–0.84, p = 0.007) and in functional independence scores (SMD = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.05–0.72, p = 0.02). No significant difference was found for lower limb motor scores (SMD = 0.03, 95% CI: −0.27–0.34, p = 0.84).

The authors did not report on adverse events, follow-up duration, or study settings. The practice relevance statement suggests adopting robot-assisted gait training as a primary functional improvement strategy, combined with targeted strength training.

The evidence is limited by the small total sample size and the lack of reported safety data. Clinicians should interpret these findings as supportive of a potential benefit, but not as definitive proof of superiority.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedMay 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BackgroundSpinal cord injury (SCI) can lead to substantial impairments in walking and mobility, and traditional rehabilitation methods face limitations such as high labor intensity and insufficient training intensity and precision. While robot-assisted gait training is widely used, its therapeutic advantages over conventional rehabilitation remain controversial.ObjectiveThrough systematic reviews and meta-analysis, this study quantitatively synthesizes existing randomized controlled trial (RCT) evidence to determine the efficacy of robot-assisted gait training on walking and mobility abilities in persons with SCI.MethodsA comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases from their inception to June 19, 2025. We included RCTs comparing robot-assisted gait training with conventional rehabilitation. Two researchers independently performed literature screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4 software to calculate standardized mean differences (SMDs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs).ResultsA total of 8 RCTs involving 241 participants were included. Meta-analysis results showed: (1) Regarding walking ability, the robot-assisted gait training group demonstrated significant improvements in the 6-min walk test distance (SMD = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.12–1.03, p = 0.01) and Spinal Cord Injury Walking Index II score (SMD = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.13–0.84, p = 0.007); (2) Regarding functional independence, the robot-assisted gait training group demonstrated superior improvement in functional independence scores (SMD = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.05–0.72, p = 0.02); (3) Regarding lower limb muscle strength, no significant difference was observed between the two groups in the improvement of lower limb motor scores (SMD = 0.03, 95% CI: −0.27–0.34, p = 0.84).ConclusionRobot-assisted gait training effectively improves functional walking endurance, gait independence, and overall function in persons with SCI. Its core mechanism lies in promoting task-specific motor learning and neuromuscular control, rather than enhancing muscle strength. It is recommended that this technology be adopted as a primary functional improvement strategy in clinical practice, combined with targeted strength training to optimize rehabilitation outcomes.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.