Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Post hoc analysis shows unsuccessful thrombectomy does not worsen outcomes for large ischemic infarcts compared to medical treatment aloneUnsuccessful clot removal did not worsen outcomes for patients with large strokes

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Unsuccessful thrombectomy is safe for large infarcts, but optimal reperfusion drives survival and functional recovery benefits.

This post hoc analysis examined 246 patients with large ischemic infarcts to compare endovascular thrombectomy combined with best medical treatment against best medical treatment alone. The study focused on a vulnerable subgroup with Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score between 3 and 5.

results indicated that unsuccessful procedures, defined as modified TICI scores of 2a or lower, were not linked to worse functional outcomes at 90 days. Similarly, mortality rates and infarct volumes did not differ significantly between the two groups when reperfusion was incomplete.

Conversely, patients who achieved first-pass complete reperfusion demonstrated substantial benefits. This optimal outcome was associated with a four-fold increase in favorable functional scores and a 29% absolute reduction in mortality compared to those with incomplete reperfusion.

The findings highlight that while unsuccessful thrombectomy is safe in this context, the primary goal should remain achieving optimal blood flow restoration. These results do not support general treatment recommendations but emphasize the critical importance of successful reperfusion.

People with large strokes face a difficult choice. Doctors often try to remove the clot causing the blockage, but sometimes the procedure does not fully clear the vessel. This analysis looked at 246 patients with large areas of brain damage to see if a less successful procedure hurt them.

The study found that when the clot removal was not fully successful, patients did not end up with worse function or higher death rates compared to those who received standard medical treatment only. The data showed no link between a partial procedure and larger areas of dead tissue or bleeding risks.

However, the best results came when the procedure fully cleared the vessel immediately. In those cases, patients had much better function and a significant drop in death rates. This highlights that getting the vessel open completely is the goal for this specific group of patients.

Because this was an analysis of existing data, the findings cannot change how doctors treat everyone right now. Still, the results suggest that achieving full vessel opening is especially important for people with large strokes.

What this means for you:
Partial clot removal did not worsen survival or function for patients with large strokes.

Study Details

Study typeRct
Sample sizen = 246
EvidenceLevel 2
PublishedJun 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: While thrombectomy benefits patients with large infarcts, it is unclear whether this benefit persists across different levels of reperfusion. AIMS: This study investigates how the degree of reperfusion influences the effectiveness of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) combined with best medical treatment (BMT), compared to BMT alone, in patients with large infarcts. METHODS: This post hoc analysis of the TENSION trial, a randomized controlled study, assessed EVT versus BMT in patients with extensive infarction (Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) 3-5). Primary outcome was the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included infarct volume at 24 h, mortality, and symptomatic hemorrhage. Outcomes were stratified by final reperfusion level, measured with the modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (mTICI) scale. Confounder-adjusted common odds ratios (cORs) and average treatment effects (ATEs) were estimated using inverse probability weighting with regression adjustment. RESULTS: A total of 246 patients (median age, 74 years (interquartile range (IQR), 65-80); median baseline ASPECTS, 4 (IQR, 3-5)) were included. Compared to BMT alone, unsuccessful EVT (mTICI ⩽ 2a) was not associated with worse functional outcomes (cOR:1.2, 95% CI, 0.95 to 1.52; p = 0.131), higher mortality (ATE: -11.6%; 95% CI, -28.82 to 5.61; p = 0.187), or larger infarct volumes on follow-up (ATE:0.99 mL; 95% CI, -45.30 to 45.32; p = 0.965). First-pass complete reperfusion (mTICI 3) showed the greatest treatment benefit, significantly improving all endpoints, with a cOR of 4.85 (95% CI, 3.74-6.31; p < 0.001) for improved mRS scores and a 29% absolute reduction in mortality. CONCLUSION: In this post hoc analysis of the TENSION trial, unsuccessful EVT did not worsen outcomes compared to BMT alone. The highest benefit of EVT occurred with first-pass complete reperfusion, emphasizing the importance of achieving optimal reperfusion in this vulnerable stroke subgroup. These findings do not justify general treatment recommendations.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.