Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Non-invasive brain stimulation with motor imagery improves upper limb function after stroke with WMD 5.75

Non-invasive brain stimulation with motor imagery improves upper limb function after stroke with…
Photo by DIANA HAUAN / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider non-invasive brain stimulation with motor imagery as a safe rehab option for upper limb recovery after stroke, pending more trials.

This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of 21 studies from 16 articles on non-invasive brain stimulation combined with motor imagery for stroke patients. The authors synthesized evidence on upper extremity motor function, functional activity, and activities of daily living. For upper extremity motor function, the pooled effect was a weighted mean difference of 5.75 (95% CI 3.67 to 7.82; P < 0.001). For upper extremity functional activity, the standardized mean difference was 1.18 (95% CI 0.78 to 1.57; P < 0.001). For activities of daily living, the weighted mean difference was 8.94 (95% CI 4.36 to 13.53; P < 0.001). The authors report the intervention was safe but did not specify adverse events. A key limitation is that further high-quality, large-scale randomized controlled trials are warranted to validate these findings and establish standardized clinical protocols. Practice relevance is that this may be an effective and safe rehabilitation strategy, but clinicians should interpret the results cautiously given the need for more robust evidence.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedJun 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
IntroductionSevere stroke frequently leads to adult disability and a loss of functional independence. Specifically, stroke-induced upper limb motor impairment significantly compromises the quality of daily life for these patients. Therefore, evaluating the efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation combined with motor imagery for the recovery of upper limb motor function is critical for improving patient outcomes.MethodsA systematic search for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted across PubMed, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, EMBASE, CNKI, Wanfang Data, and VIP databases, spanning from their inception through September 4, 2025. Key outcome measures included upper extremity motor function (assessed via FMA-UE), upper extremity functional activity (ARAT and WMFT), and activities of daily living (MBI). Statistical analyses were performed using Stata 18.0. Effect sizes were calculated as weighted mean differences (WMD) or standardized mean deviations (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using random-effects models.ResultsThe meta-analysis, comprising 21 studies from 16 articles, demonstrated that MI combined with NIBS significantly improved upper extremity motor function (WMD = 5.75; 95% CI = 3.67, 7.82; P < 0.001), upper extremity functional activity (SMD = 1.18; 95% CI = 0.78, 1.57; P < 0.001), and activities of daily living (WMD = 8.94; 95% CI = 4.36, 13.53; P < 0.001). Subgroup analyses identified stroke chronicity, NIBS modality, stimulation and training duration, MI paradigm, and comparator type as significant moderators of the intervention effect.ConclusionThe combined intervention of MI and NIBS constitutes an effective and safe rehabilitation strategy that significantly enhances upper limb motor function and activities of daily living following stroke. Nevertheless, further high-quality, large-scale randomized controlled trials are warranted to validate these findings and establish standardized clinical protocols.Systematic review registrationPROSPERO (Registration number: CRD420251167952).
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.