Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Intravenous thrombolysis combined with endovascular treatment improves 90-day functional independence in tandem lesion strokeCombined Treatments Show Better Outcomes for Specific Stroke Patients

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider IVT combined with EVT for improved 90-day outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke and tandem lesions.

This meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) combined with endovascular treatment (EVT) compared to EVT alone in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to tandem lesions. The analysis included 1756 patients and assessed outcomes including recanalization, functional independence at 90 days, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), and mortality.

The study found that the IVT plus EVT group had a higher rate of successful recanalization (RR = 1.11; 95% CI, 1.04-1.18; p < 0.05) compared to those receiving EVT alone. Functional independence at 90 days was also improved in the IVT plus EVT group (RR = 1.27; 95% CI, 1.13-1.42; p < 0.05). Furthermore, mortality at 90 days was lower for patients receiving both interventions (RR = 0.67; 95% CI, 0.52-0.87; p < 0.05).

Regarding safety, there was no discernible difference in the rate of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage between the two groups (RR = 0.72; 95% CI, 0.46-1.12; p > 0.05). While the data suggest that IVT combined with EVT may be correlated with superior functional results at 90 days for patients with tandem lesions, these findings are based on a meta-analysis and represent an association rather than direct causation.

How this fits prior evidence

This finding addresses a gap in management for acute ischemic stroke specifically involving tandem lesions. While prior evidence indicates that intravenous thrombolysis does not improve excellent functional recovery in patients with minor acute ischemic stroke, this meta-analysis suggests that adding IVT to EVT may provide superior functional results and lower mortality in the specific subset of patients presenting with tandem lesions.

A meta-analysis looked at 1,756 patients who experienced an acute ischemic stroke caused by tandem lesions. Researchers compared two different treatment paths: giving patients both intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and endovascular treatment (EVT), versus giving them only the endovascular treatment.

The results showed that patients who received both treatments had a higher rate of successful recanalization, which means opening the blocked blood vessels. Additionally, these patients were more likely to achieve functional independence after 90 days compared to those who received only one type of treatment. The study also found a lower rate of death at the 90-day mark for those receiving both treatments.

One important safety finding was that there was no significant difference in the risk of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage between the two groups. Because this is a meta-analysis, it shows a link between combined treatment and better outcomes rather than proving direct cause. Patients and doctors should consider these findings as part of a broader clinical discussion regarding stroke care.

What this means for you:
Combining thrombolytics with endovascular treatment may improve recovery and survival for certain stroke patients.

Common questions

What are the benefits of combining IVT and EVT?

Patients who received both intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and endovascular treatment (EVT) showed a higher rate of successful recanalization. They also had a higher likelihood of achieving functional independence at 90 days and a lower rate of mortality compared to those receiving only EVT.

Is it safer to use both treatments together?

The study found no significant difference in the risk of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage between patients who received both IVT and EVT versus those who received only EVT. This suggests that adding thrombolytics did not increase this specific risk in the studied group.

Who specifically does this finding help?

This finding specifically relates to patients with an acute ischemic stroke (AIS) caused by tandem lesions. The data suggests these patients may have better functional outcomes when both treatment methods are used together.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
Sample sizen = 1,756
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedAug 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
OBJECTIVE: For patients suffering from acute ischemic stroke (AIS) brought on by tandem lesions (TL), to compare the safety and efficacy of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in conjunction with endovascular therapy (EVT) to EVT alone. METHODS: Relevant studies published up until October 20, 2024, were found by a systematic assessment of the literature from the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Results such as the 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, effective recanalization, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), and 90-day mortality were the main focus of the comparison between IVT plus EVT and EVT alone in patients with TL. RESULTS: A total of 1756 patients from nine studies were included in the final analysis; 976 of these patients were categorized as IVT + EVT group patients, and 780 as EVT alone group patients. The IVT plus EVT group was associated with a higher rate of successful recanalization (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score [mTICI] ≥ 2b/3) (RR = 1.11; 95% CI, 1.04-1.18; p < 0.05; I = 27%) and improved functional independence at 90 days (mRS 0-2) (RR = 1.27; 95% CI, 1.13-1.42; p < 0.05; I = 0%). There was no discernible difference in the two groups' risk of sICH (RR = 0.72; 95% CI, 0.46-1.12; p > 0.05; I = 20%). Furthermore, the 90-day mortality rate was lower for IVT with EVT than for EVT alone (RR = 0.67; 95% CI, 0.52-0.87; p < 0.05; I = 0%). CONCLUSION: IVT + EVT, as opposed to EVT alone, may be correlated with superior functional results at 90 days in AIS patients with TL.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.