Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

VerifyNow-guided antiplatelet modification linked to lower stroke recurrence in atherothrombotic or lacunar infarction

VerifyNow-guided antiplatelet modification linked to lower stroke recurrence in atherothrombotic or …
Photo by Logan Voss / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider VerifyNow-guided antiplatelet modification cautiously in stroke; evidence is observational.

This was a single-center retrospective observational study involving 243 analyzed patients (122 in a modified group, 121 in an unmodified group) with atherothrombotic or lacunar infarction. The intervention was VerifyNow-guided antiplatelet therapy modification, where selection was based on VerifyNow Aspirin Reaction Units and P2Y12 Reaction Units, with switching to prasugrel or cilostazol if both aspirin and clopidogrel showed inadequate inhibition. The comparator was empirically selected antiplatelet agent (unmodified group).

For the primary outcome of recurrent ischemic stroke, the modified group had 1 patient (0.8%) versus 8 patients (6.6%) in the unmodified group over a mean follow-up of 1.62 +/- 0.61 years. The hazard ratio was 0.10, with a 95% CI of 0.012-0.84, an adjusted P=0.033, and an unadjusted log-rank P=0.018, indicating a lower risk in the modified group. For safety, intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 0 patients (0%) in the modified group versus 1 patient (0.8%) in the unmodified group; other adverse events, serious adverse events, discontinuations, and tolerability were not reported.

Key limitations include the single-center retrospective design and small sample size. Funding or conflicts of interest were not reported. The practice relevance is that validation in a multicenter randomized controlled trial is warranted, as this study reports an association without claiming causality, and the evidence is limited due to the retrospective observational design.

Study Details

Study typeRct
Sample sizen = 302
EvidenceLevel 2
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Bakground and Purpose Antiplatelet resistance is a recognized risk factor for recurrent ischemic stroke, yet evidence supporting platelet function test?guided antiplatelet therapy modification in stroke prevention remains limited. We investigated whether VerifyNow-guided antiplatelet therapy modification reduces recurrent ischemic stroke in patients with atherothrombotic or lacunar infarction. Methods This retrospective observational study enrolled consecutive patients with atherothrombotic or lacunar infarction at a single center (April 2023-March 2025). Of 302 patients, 243 were analyzed: 122 in the modified group, whose antiplatelet agent was selected based on VerifyNow Aspirin Reaction Units and P2Y12 Reaction Units, and 121 in the unmodified group, whose agent was empirically selected. The mean follow-up period was 1.62 {+/-} 0.61 years. In the modified group, when both aspirin and clopidogrel showed inadequate inhibition, prasugrel or cilostazol was selected. The primary endpoint was recurrent ischemic stroke; the secondary endpoint was intracranial hemorrhage. Cox proportional hazards models with inverse probability weighting were used to adjust for confounders. Results Recurrent ischemic stroke occurred in 1 patient (0.8%) in the modified group versus 8 (6.6%) in the unmodified group (log-rank P=0.018). After adjustment, the modified group had a significantly lower risk of recurrent stroke (HR, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.012-0.84; P=0.033). Intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 0 (0%) and 1 (0.8%) patients, respectively. Conclusions In Japanese patients with atherothrombotic or lacunar infarction, VerifyNow-guided antiplatelet therapy modification was associated with a significantly lower incidence of recurrent ischemic stroke without increased hemorrhagic risk. Given the single-center retrospective design and small sample size, validation in a multicenter randomized controlled trial is warranted.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.