Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Newer-generation antiseizure medications improve treatment retention and safety in older adults with epilepsyNewer Antiseizure Medications May Improve Treatment Retention in Seniors

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that newer-generation antiseizure medications improve treatment retention and safety but do not differ in seizure freedom.

This meta-analysis evaluates the comparative efficacy and safety of newer-generation versus older-generation antiseizure medications in a population of 2,507 older adults with epilepsy. The analysis focused on primary outcomes of seizure freedom and secondary outcomes including treatment retention and withdrawal rates.

The synthesis found no significant difference in seizure freedom between the two medication categories (95% CI 0.80 to 1.76). However, newer-generation medications were associated with higher treatment retention (95% CI 1.22 to 1.47) and lower rates of withdrawal for any reason (95% CI 0.64 to 0.80). Additionally, adverse-event-related discontinuation was lower in the newer-generation group (95% CI 0.45 to 0.64).

Several limitations affect the certainty of these results, including a small and clinically heterogeneous evidence base, pharmacologically heterogeneous medication categories, and mixed study designs. The authors note that the evidence is of low to very low certainty. Clinical application should be approached with caution due to these limitations and the lack of significant difference in primary seizure outcomes.

How this fits prior evidence

This meta-analysis addresses a gap in comparing medication generations for older adults with epilepsy. While prior evidence highlights the role of non-pharmacological interventions like rTMS and cathodal tDCS for seizure reduction, and the impact of sleep disturbances on seizure thresholds, this study focuses specifically on the pharmacological differences between newer and older antiseizure medications. It confirms that while seizure freedom outcomes are similar, newer medications may offer better tolerability and retention.

Researchers looked at how older adults with epilepsy responded to different types of medications. They compared newer-generation antiseizure medications against older-generation options to see if one group performed better in terms of seizure control and treatment consistency.

The analysis of 2,507 patients found that both groups had similar rates of seizure freedom. However, patients taking newer-generation medications were more likely to stay on their treatment and less likely to stop their medication due to side effects. This suggests that newer drugs might be easier for some seniors to tolerate over time.

Because the evidence is considered low to very low certainty, these results should be viewed with caution. The study included many different types of medications and varied ways of measuring success. While the data suggests better retention for newer drugs, it does not show a clear difference in how well the drugs stopped seizures. Patients should talk to their doctors about which medication is best for their specific needs.

What this means for you:
Newer antiseizure drugs may help older adults stay on treatment longer, but they do not show better seizure control.

Common questions

Are newer medications better at stopping seizures?

The study found no significant difference in seizure freedom between newer-generation and older-generation antiseizure medications. This means both types of drugs were equally effective at achieving seizure freedom in the group of 2,507 older adults studied.

Why might some seniors prefer newer medications?

Patients taking newer-generation medications were more likely to stay on their treatment. They were also less likely to stop their medication because of adverse events compared to those taking older-generation medications.

How reliable are these findings for my treatment?

The evidence for these findings is considered low to very low certainty. Because the study included many different types of medications and varied study designs, you should talk to your doctor to decide which treatment is right for you.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedSep 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
ObjectiveOlder adults with epilepsy frequently have multiple comorbidities, polypharmacy, and reduced medication tolerance; therefore, ASM selection must consider seizure control, treatment persistence, and tolerability. This study compared the efficacy and safety outcomes of newer-generation and older-generation ASMs in older adults with epilepsy.MethodsPubMed, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to April 30, 2026. Comparative clinical studies evaluating newer-generation versus older-generation ASMs in populations defined as older adults by the original studies were eligible. The primary outcome was seizure freedom; secondary outcomes included seizure-free retention, treatment retention, withdrawal for any reason, discontinuation due to adverse events, and adverse reactions. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using fixed- or random-effects models according to statistical and clinical heterogeneity.ResultsNine studies involving 2,507 participants were included, comprising randomized, open-label, post-hoc subgroup, and retrospective evidence. Overall seizure freedom did not differ significantly between the two medication categories (RR = 1.18, 95% CI 0.80–1.76; I2 = 93%), and the restricted sensitivity analysis remained non-significant (RR = 1.11, 95% CI 0.94–1.30). No significant difference was observed in seizure-free retention. Newer-generation ASMs were associated with higher treatment retention (RR = 1.34, 95% CI 1.22–1.47), with the inverse outcome of withdrawal for any reason correspondingly lower (RR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.64–0.80); adverse-event-related discontinuation was also lower (RR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.45–0.64). In the exploratory post-stroke analysis based on two randomized studies, the random-effects estimate did not show a significant difference in seizure freedom (RR = 1.30, 95% CI 0.81–2.08; I2 = 77%).ConclusionAcross a small and clinically heterogeneous evidence base, seizure freedom did not clearly differ between newer- and older-generation ASMs, whereas treatment retention and adverse-event-related discontinuation favored newer-generation agents; however, the certainty of evidence was low or very low. These class-level findings should be interpreted cautiously because the medication categories were pharmacologically heterogeneous and the evidence included mixed study designs, variable age definitions, and inconsistent outcome windows.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.