Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Endovascular treatment improves 90-day mRS distribution with odds ratio 2.83 in elderly stroke patientsEndovascular Treatment Shows Better Outcomes for Elderly Stroke Patients

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that EVT improves 90-day functional outcomes in elderly patients with large ischemic stroke but increases hemorrhage risk.

This study utilized data from a cohort study and a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of endovascular treatment (EVT) compared to standard medical treatment (SMT) in 270 patients aged 80 years or older with large ischemic stroke. The primary outcome was the distribution of 90-day modified Rankin scale (mRS) scores.

Patients receiving EVT showed a favorable shift in 90-day mRS distribution compared with SMT, with an adjusted common odds ratio of 2.83 (95% confidence interval 1.48-5.70, P=0.003). Secondary outcomes including mRS scores of 0-2, 0-3, and 0-4 all favored the EVT group. Additionally, 90-day mortality was significantly lower in the EVT group (P=0.009).

Safety data indicated that the risk of intracerebral hemorrhage was significantly higher in the EVT group (P=0.001). While EVT was associated with more favorable 90-day functional outcomes and lower mortality than SMT in this elderly population, the increased risk of hemorrhage must be balanced against these benefits. The study used a combination of cohort and RCT data, and specific limitations were not reported.

A study involving 270 patients aged 80 and older who suffered large ischemic strokes compared two treatments. One group received endovascular treatment (EVT), while the other received standard medical treatment (SMT). The researchers looked at functional outcomes and survival rates over a 90-day period.

The results showed that patients who received endovascular treatment had a more favorable distribution of functional scores compared to those receiving standard care. Additionally, the group receiving endovascular treatment had a significantly lower mortality rate. These findings suggest that the procedure may help older patients achieve better physical outcomes after a major stroke.

However, there is an important safety consideration. The study found that the risk of intracerebral hemorrhage, or bleeding in the brain, was significantly higher for those who underwent the endovascular procedure. Because this study used a mix of cohort and trial data, the results show a link rather than a direct cause. Patients and doctors should weigh these benefits against the specific risks of bleeding when choosing a treatment plan.

What this means for you:
Endovascular treatment may improve recovery and survival for elderly stroke patients but carries a higher risk of brain bleeding.

Common questions

Is endovascular treatment effective for elderly stroke patients?

The study of 270 patients aged 80 and older showed that endovascular treatment (EVT) was associated with a more favorable distribution of functional outcomes and lower mortality rates compared to standard medical treatment over a 90-day period.

What are the risks of endovascular treatment for stroke patients?

While the treatment showed better outcomes, it was associated with a significantly higher risk of intracerebral hemorrhage (bleeding in the brain) compared to standard medical treatment. Patients should discuss these specific risks with their medical team.

How does this treatment compare to standard medical treatment?

Patients who received endovascular treatment showed a favorable shift in functional scores and a significantly lower mortality rate than those who received standard medical treatment. However, the risk of bleeding was higher in the endovascular group.

Study Details

Study typeRct
EvidenceLevel 2
Follow-up960.0 mo
PublishedJan 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
OBJECTIVES: Whether endovascular treatment (EVT) remained effective and safe in patients aged ≥80 years with large ischemic stroke was unclear. We aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of EVT in this population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using data from a cohort study and randomized controlled trial, we included patients aged ≥80 years with large ischemic stroke treated with EVT or standard medical treatment (SMT) alone, and compared clinical outcomes between the two groups. Furthermore, EVT patients were dichotomized by age (80-84 and ≥85 years) to evaluate associations between age and outcomes. The primary effectiveness outcome was the distribution of 90-day modified Rankin scale (mRS) score. Safety outcomes were 90-day mortality and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage within 48 hours. RESULTS: 270 eligible patients were included, with 212 in EVT group. EVT was associated with a favorable shift in the distribution of 90-day mRS scores compared with SMT (adjusted common odds ratio 2.83, 95% confidence interval 1.48-5.70, P=0.003). Secondary effectiveness outcomes including 90-day mRS score 0-2, 0-3 and 0-4 also favored EVT. The 90-day mortality was significantly lower in EVT group (P=0.009). However, the rate of any intracerebral hemorrhage was significantly higher in EVT group (P=0.001). Notably, increasing age did not modify the treatment effect of EVT. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients aged ≥80 years with large ischemic stroke, EVT was associated with more favorable 90-day functional outcomes and lower mortality than SMT, but with a higher risk of intracerebral hemorrhage. The treatment effect of EVT remained consistent regardless of age in this population.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.