This narrative review evaluates the landscape of immunomodulation strategies applicable to a spectrum of liver conditions, including acute liver injury, HBV infection, MASLD/MASH, fibrosis, and cirrhosis. The scope encompasses the complex biological barriers to effective treatment, specifically highlighting the difficulties in mastering macrophage heterogeneity and resolving in vivo dynamics. Additionally, the authors point out cross-species discrepancies and the challenge of achieving durable, context-specific modulation as significant hurdles in current research.
The authors argue that the field must move away from broad immunosuppression toward more precise strategies tailored to specific disease contexts. However, the review does not provide specific pooled effect sizes, sample sizes, or adverse event rates, as these details were not reported in the source material. The discussion remains qualitative, focusing on the conceptual shift required in therapeutic development rather than quantitative efficacy data.
Limitations acknowledged include the inherent difficulties in translating findings across species and maintaining modulation over time. Consequently, the practice relevance is framed as a strategic pivot rather than an immediate change in standard of care based on robust trial data. Clinicians should interpret these findings as a call for future research directions rather than established clinical guidelines.
View Original Abstract ↓
Liver macrophages are master regulators of disease progression and resolution, whose functions transcend the simplistic M1/M2 dichotomy. This review synthesizes cutting-edge evidence to establish a dynamic, subset-centric paradigm for understanding macrophage plasticity. In acute liver injury, we delineate how temporally segregated subsets (e.g., early CCR2+ vs. late MerTK+ macrophages) sequentially orchestrate damage and repair. In chronic settings—including HBV infection, MASLD/MASH, and fibrosis/cirrhosis—we reveal a complex coexistence of functionally opposed subsets that concurrently drive pathology (e.g., CD9+TREM2+ macrophages) and promote resolution (e.g., CD300E+ macrophages). This refined understanding underpins a critical appraisal of the evolving therapeutic landscape, which is pivoting from broad immunosuppression towards precision strategies. These include pharmacological targeting of specific recruitment or signaling pathways, adoptive transfer of reparative subsets, and innovative engineered cell therapies (e.g., signal-converting CAR-Ms). By framing macrophage functional duality within the “friend or foe” paradigm, this review provides a conceptual framework for developing subset-specific therapies that harness the beneficial while mitigating the harmful faces of hepatic macrophages. We highlight that the key translational challenge lies in mastering macrophage heterogeneity—requiring resolution of in vivo dynamics, cross-species discrepancies, and achievement of durable, context-specific modulation. The future of “macrophage medicine” hinges on integrating spatial multi-omics and advanced imaging to enable spatiotemporally precise interventions, ultimately leveraging the cell’s inherent plasticity for therapeutic gain.