Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Theory-informed behavioural intervention reduces ultra-processed food intake and weight in UK adults

Theory-informed behavioural intervention reduces ultra-processed food intake and weight in UK adults
Photo by Motion Lady / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider theory-informed behavioural support as a feasible option to reduce UPF intake, pending randomised confirmation.

This was an exploratory single-arm pre-post study (UPDATE trial, stage 1) of a 6-month behavioural intervention designed to reduce ultra-processed food (UPF) consumption and increase physical activity and minimally processed food (MPF) intake in UK adults. Participants (N=45) were living with overweight or obesity and had habitual UPF intake of at least 50% of total energy, and entered the behavioural phase after a controlled feeding phase. The intervention was developed using the Behaviour Change Wheel and the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behaviour (COM-B) model.

The programme combined one-to-one sessions with a behavioural scientist, tailored print and digital materials, peer-support meetings, and a moderated group chat. Feasibility outcomes were uptake, retention, and intervention fidelity; secondary outcomes included COM-B constructs, dietary intake, physical activity, clinical and self-reported measures, and qualitative feedback. No comparator arm was used.

Uptake was 91% (41/45) and 6-month retention was 68% (28/41), with 83% (34/41) providing follow-up data. Median attendance at one-to-one sessions was 86% (IQR: 57-100), and fidelity to core behaviour change techniques was reported as high. COM-B scores improved for healthy eating (+7%, SD: 8; p<0.001) and physical activity (+5%, SD: 9; p=0.013). UPF intake fell by 25% of total energy (95% CI: -32, -17) with a corresponding rise in MPF of 23% (95% CI: 17, 29). Vigorous physical activity increased by 60 min/week (IQR: 0-180), weekday sitting time decreased by 61 min/day (SD: 110), and weight decreased by 3.8 kg (IQR: -8.5-1.0; p=0.001). Per-protocol findings were similar, and qualitative data indicated perceived improvements in wellbeing and habit formation.

Key limitations are the single-arm pre-post design without randomisation or control group, modest sample size, and reliance on self-reported behavioural measures; safety and adverse events were not reported. Clinical relevance is restrained: the intervention appears feasible and acceptable and is associated with favourable behavioural and weight changes, but a randomised controlled pilot is warranted before broader implementation.

Study Details

Study typeRct
Sample sizen = 45
EvidenceLevel 2
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Introduction High consumption of ultra-processed foods (UPF) is associated with adverse health outcomes and weight gain. Despite increasing calls for behavioural strategies to reduce UPF intake, no theory-informed intervention targeting UPF reduction has been evaluated in UK adults in alignment with national dietary guidance. We assessed the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary behavioural and clinical outcomes of a multi-component intervention designed to reduce UPF consumption (and increase physical activity (PA)/minimally processed food (MPF) intake). Methods In this exploratory single-arm pre-post study, adults (N=45) living with overweight or obesity and habitual UPF intake [&ge;]50% of total energy were offered a 6-month behavioural intervention following a controlled feeding phase (UPDATE trial, stage 1). The intervention was developed using the Behaviour Change Wheel and Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behaviour (COM-B) model and included one-to-one sessions with a behavioural scientist, tailored print and digital materials, peer-support meetings, and a moderated group chat. Feasibility outcomes included uptake, retention, and intervention fidelity. Secondary outcomes included COM-B constructs, dietary intake, PA, clinical and self-reported outcomes, and qualitative feedback. Results Uptake was 91% (41/45). Retention at 6 months was 68% (28/41), with 83% (34/41) providing follow-up data (intention-to-treat). Median attendance at one-to-one sessions was 86% (interquartile range (IQR): 57-100) with 56% (23/41) attending all sessions (per-protocol). Fidelity to core behaviour change techniques was high. At 6 months, COM-B scores improved for healthy eating (+7%, standard deviation (SD): 8; p<0.001) and physical activity (+5%, SD: 9; p=0.013). UPF intake decreased by 25% of total energy (95% confidence interval (95%CI): -32, -17), with a corresponding increase in minimally processed foods (+23%; 95%CI: 17, 29). Vigorous physical activity increased (+60 min/week, IQR: 0-180), weekday sitting time decreased (-61 min/day, SD: 110), and weight reduced by 3.8 kg (IQR: -8.5-1.0; p=0.001). Findings were similar in per-protocol analyses. Qualitative data indicated perceived improvements in wellbeing and habit formation. Conclusion This theory-informed intervention demonstrated good feasibility and acceptability and was associated with improvements in targeted behavioural mechanisms and health-related outcomes. A randomised controlled pilot trial is warranted to evaluate effectiveness and refine implementation.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.