Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

LCHF and HCLF diets both improve HRQoL in type 2 diabetes, with no significant between-group differenceCan a low-carb diet improve how you feel with diabetes?

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note similar HRQoL improvement with LCHF and HCLF diets in type 2 diabetes; benefit linked to adherence.

This randomized controlled trial enrolled 165 people with type 2 diabetes (median age 56 years, mean BMI 33 kg/m², mean HbA1c 56 mmol/mol) to compare a 6-month low-carbohydrate high-fat (LCHF) diet with a high-carbohydrate low-fat (HCLF) diet. The analysis focused on secondary outcomes, including health-related quality of life (HRQoL), dietary compliance, and sustained adherence.

After the 6-month intervention, HRQoL improved significantly in both groups. The LCHF group had a mean change of -14.5 (95% CI: -20.7, -8.36; P < 0.001) and the HCLF group had a mean change of -13.7 (95% CI: -22.7, -4.6; P = 0.003). The between-group difference in HRQoL change was not statistically significant (P = 0.855). Higher improvements in HRQoL were associated with higher compliance with the assigned diets (Spearman's rho: -0.183; P = 0.0378). The analysis also reported that HRQoL improvement increased the likelihood of sustained adherence to the LCHF diet, but not the HCLF diet.

Safety, tolerability, adverse events, and the study's primary outcome were not reported. This was a secondary, prespecified analysis of an RCT, and the reported associations do not imply causation. The finding that HRQoL improved similarly with both dietary patterns suggests the benefit may be related to structured dietary intervention and adherence rather than a specific macronutrient composition. Clinicians should interpret these HRQoL findings cautiously alongside other clinical outcomes.

When you're managing type 2 diabetes, what you eat can feel like a constant battle. You might wonder if a specific diet, like cutting carbs, could make you feel better day-to-day, beyond just your blood sugar numbers. A new study put that question to the test by comparing a low-carb, high-fat diet to a high-carb, low-fat diet in 165 people with type 2 diabetes for six months.

The research found that people's health-related quality of life—essentially, how good they felt physically and mentally—improved in both groups. There was no clear winner; the boost in well-being was about the same whether they were on the low-carb or the high-carb plan. However, the study uncovered something more personal: the people who felt the biggest improvement were also the ones who stuck most closely to their assigned diet. For those on the low-carb plan, feeling better was also linked to a higher chance they kept following it.

It's important to understand what this study can and can't tell us. This was a look at secondary outcomes, meaning the main goal of the original trial might have been something else, like weight loss or blood sugar control. The researchers didn't report on safety, side effects, or what happened to people's primary health markers. Also, the link between feeling better and sticking to the diet was only seen for the low-carb group, not the high-carb one. So, while the connection between sticking to your diet and feeling better is promising, especially for low-carb eaters, we don't yet have the full picture on long-term effects or safety.

What this means for you:
Sticking to your diet may improve how you feel with diabetes, regardless of whether it's low-carb or high-carb.

Study Details

Study typeRct
Sample sizen = 165
EvidenceLevel 2
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is a central aspect of overall health and a crucial factor in dietary interventions, as it may determine both dietary compliance and sustained adherence. OBJECTIVES: We assessed the effect on HRQoL between: 1) the low-carbohydrate high-fat (LCHF) diet and 2) the high-carbohydrate low-fat (HCLF) diet and evaluated the impact on dietary compliance and sustained adherence. METHODS: This is a prespecified secondary analysis from a randomized controlled trial in people with type 2 diabetes. Participants were randomly assigned 2:1 to follow either LCHF or HCLF for 6 mo with a postintervention visit 9 mo after inclusion. Liver biopsies were performed at baseline and after 6 mo, the Diabetes-39 HRQoL questionnaire, standard clinical and compliance assessments were conducted at baseline, 3 mo, 6 mo, and 9 mo (postintervention). Sustained adherence was assessed at the postintervention visit. RESULTS: We randomly assigned 165 participants; 96 (58%) were female. At baseline, the median age was 56 [interquartile range (IQR) 50-63] y, mean body mass index was 33 + 7 kg/m, total median HRQoL score was 88 (IQR, 70-111), mean hemoglobin A1c was 56+10 mmol/mol, and 141 (88%) had metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. After 6-mo intervention, HRQoL improved in both groups {LCHF: -14.5 [95% confidence interval (CI): -20.7, -8.36]; P < 0.001; HCLF; -13.7 (95% CI: -22.7, -4.6); P = 0.003} with no mean difference in change between groups (Δ) P = 0.855. Higher improvements in HRQoL were associated with a higher compliance with the diets (Spearman's rho; -0.183; P = 0.0378) and increased the likelihood of sustained adherence to the LCHF diet. CONCLUSIONS: HRQoL improved in both dietary intervention groups with no difference between groups. Dietary compliance was associated with improved HRQoL and may play a role in sustained adherence to the LCHF diet. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03068078.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.