This narrative review evaluates the relationship between ultra-processed foods (UPF) intake and health outcomes in adults across global settings. The scope includes sarcopenia, functional impairment, and related biological markers. The authors report that UPF intake is associated with higher risk for micronutrient inadequacy and functional impairment. Additionally, the review finds associations with low-grade systemic inflammation, oxidative damage, and measurable advances in biological age relative to chronological age.
The authors highlight several limitations, including the underrepresentation of low- and middle-income settings and a lack of long-term intervention trials with aging and functional endpoints. Heterogeneous assessment of UPFs and limited use of mechanistic biomarkers and omics approaches in population studies were also identified as constraints. These factors contribute to the uncertainty regarding precise effect sizes and absolute numbers, which were not reported in the source material.
Practice relevance is framed cautiously, with the authors suggesting a need to prioritize minimally processed foods and fortify regulatory frameworks. Customizing community and clinical interventions to meet the needs of older adults is recommended. The review concludes that while consistent evidence indicates an association, gaps remain that prevent definitive clinical recommendations regarding causation.
View Original Abstract ↓
Ultra-processed foods (UPFs) intake has rapidly increased in global diets, posing a mounting threat to nutritional adequacy and functional health in adults. This narrative review summarizes recent evidence on the relationship between UPF consumption and functional decline, including sarcopenia and reduced handgrip strength, and potential biological mechanisms underlying the detrimental effects of high UPF consumption and aging processes. We examined epidemiological studies, clinical trials, and mechanistic research and evaluated the effectiveness and limitations of mitigation strategies, such as product reformulation, front-of-pack labeling, pricing policies, and community-based nutrition programs. Consistent evidence indicates that higher UPF intake is associated with a greater risk of micronutrient inadequacy, low-grade systemic inflammation and oxidative damage, measurable advances in biological age relative to chronological age, and higher risk of functional impairment. Although evidence linking UPF consumption with health and aging outcomes is steadily increasing, several gaps remain, including the underrepresentation of low- and middle-income settings, the lack of long-term intervention trials with aging and functional endpoints, the heterogeneous assessment of UPFs, and the limited use of mechanistic biomarkers and “omics” approaches in population studies. We suggest an interdisciplinary research approach that combines nutritional epidemiology with validated aging outcomes. In parallel, practical policy measures should prioritize minimally processed foods, fortify regulatory frameworks, and customize community and clinical interventions to meet the needs of older adults, thereby safeguarding healthy aging.