Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Systematic review and meta-analysis shows Mediterranean diet adherence correlates with reduced mortality in cancer patients.

Systematic review and meta-analysis shows Mediterranean diet adherence correlates with reduced morta…
Photo by Ayanda Kunene / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider Mediterranean diet adherence as a promising, sustainable strategy for cancer care.

This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the association between adherence to the Mediterranean diet and survival outcomes in patients with cancer. The analysis included 17 studies with sample sizes ranging from 23 to 6457 participants. The primary outcomes assessed were overall and disease-free survival.

The meta-analysis found reduced overall mortality associated with diet adherence across multiple cancer types. For overall mortality, the pooled risk ratio was 0.96 with a 95% CI of 0.94-0.98. Specific hazard ratios for overall mortality included 0.92 for head and neck cancer (95% CI: 0.84-1.00), 0.68 for ovarian cancer (95% CI: 0.56-0.87), 0.97 for prostate cancer (95% CI: 0.95-0.99), and 0.97 for breast cancer (95% CI: 0.96-0.98). Gastric cancer showed a hazard ratio of 0.50 (95% CI: 0.45-0.55).

Disease-free survival in breast cancer was improved with a hazard ratio of 0.39 (95% CI: 0.15-0.72). The authors note that higher adherence to the Mediterranean diet correlates with improved survival. Safety data, adverse events, and discontinuations were not reported. The authors characterize the evidence as moderate-certainty and suggest this approach is a promising, sustainable strategy to be integrated in cancer care.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedMay 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: Cancer remains a leading global health burden, yet survival rates are improving due to better prevention and treatment advances. In this systematic review and meta-analysis we investigate the impact of adherence to the Mediterranean diet (MD) on overall and disease-free survival in cancer patients across various cancer types. METHODS: This review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 and MOOSE guidelines. A comprehensive search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane Library was performed up to February 28, 2024. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated with the NUTRIGRADE approach. Pooled effect sizes were computed using a random-effects model and expressed as risk ratios, hazard ratios (HR), or odds ratios. RESULTS: Among 8314 records initially identified, 17 studies were included; sample sizes ranged from 23 to 6457. Moderate-certainty evidence showed that higher adherence to the MD was associated with reduced overall mortality in cancer patients (risk ratio: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.94-0.98), including subgroups with head and neck (HR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.84-1.00), ovarian (HR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.56-0.87), prostate (HR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.95-0.99), breast (HR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.96-0.98), and gastric cancer (HR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.45-0.55). Moderate-certainty evidence supported improved disease-free survival in patients with breast cancer (HR: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.15-0.72). CONCLUSIONS: Higher adherence to the MD correlates with improved survival and quality of life in various cancers. It is therefore a promising, sustainable strategy to be integrated in cancer care.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.