Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

After neoadjuvant chemotherapy, breast-conserving surgery shows 9.7% tumour-on-ink margin positivityNeoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Surgery Outcomes for Breast Cancer Patients

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Interpret pooled margin positivity of 9.7% after NACT and BCS cautiously given heterogeneity.

This meta-analysis examined oncologic surgical outcomes among patients with early-stage and locally advanced breast cancer undergoing breast-conserving surgery (BCS) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Seven studies comprising 3962 patients were included, with 6 studies (3855 patients) contributing to the quantitative synthesis. The analysis focused on tumour-on-ink margin positivity as the primary outcome and re-excision rate as a secondary outcome.

Pooled tumour-on-ink margin positivity was 9.7% (95% CI 5.8-13.6%). The pooled re-excision rate was 14.0%, but with a wide confidence interval (95% CI 0.0-30.6%) reflecting substantial between-study heterogeneity, which the authors identify as a key limitation.

The authors note that tumour-on-ink margin positivity after BCS following NACT appears comparable to primary surgery, while re-excision rates are higher and more variable. Residual ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive lobular carcinoma were associated with higher rates of margin positivity and re-excision.

No comparative effect estimates, adverse event data, or follow-up duration were reported, and funding or conflicts of interest were not described. Certainty of evidence was not formally graded. The findings are descriptive pooled proportions rather than comparisons against a control group, so they should not be read as evidence of superiority or inferiority relative to primary surgery.

How this fits prior evidence

This meta-analysis adds surgical outcome data to prior coverage of early breast cancer supportive care and prognostication. Earlier items addressed education programs improving FACT-B scores (51% vs 32%) and reactive patient-reported outcome assessment for symptom triage, both focused on quality-of-life domains rather than surgical endpoints. Prior coverage also examined predictors of axillary disease, including SLN macrometastasis and abnormal axillary ultrasound as predictors of non-sentinel lymph node metastasis. The present analysis extends this by quantifying margin positivity (9.7%) and re-excision (14.0%) after NACT followed by BCS, a surgical question not addressed in prior items. It does not confirm or contrast those findings directly.

Researchers looked at the results for patients with early-stage or locally advanced breast cancer. These patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy before undergoing breast-conserving surgery. The study analyzed data from nearly 4,000 patients across several different studies to see how the treatment affected surgical margins.

The findings showed that the rate of tumor-on-ink margin positivity was 9.7 percent. This rate is comparable to what is typically seen in primary surgery without prior chemotherapy. However, the rate of re-excision was found to be 14.0 percent. This specific rate was noted to be more variable across different studies.

Patients with certain types of cancer, such as invasive lobular carcinoma or residual DCIS, were more likely to have positive margins or require re-excision. Because of the differences between studies, these results should be viewed as a general overview. Patients should talk to their doctors about how these specific findings apply to their personal treatment plan.

What this means for you:
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy shows similar margin positivity to primary surgery, but re-excision rates can vary.

Common questions

What is the risk of needing a second surgery after chemotherapy?

The study found a re-excision rate of 14.0 percent for patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by breast-conserving surgery. However, this rate showed significant variation between different studies. Patients with invasive lobular carcinoma or residual DCIS were more likely to experience these higher rates of re-excision.

Does chemotherapy before surgery affect the surgical margins?

The study found that the rate of tumor-on-ink margin positivity was 9.7 percent. This result is comparable to the rates typically seen in primary surgery without prior chemotherapy. This suggests that the chemotherapy did not significantly change the likelihood of a positive margin compared to standard surgery.

Who is most at risk for positive margins after chemotherapy?

The data indicates that patients with residual DCIS and invasive lobular carcinoma are associated with higher rates of margin positivity and re-excision. You should discuss your specific diagnosis with your oncology team to understand how these risks apply to your case.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
Sample sizen = 3,962
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedNov 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is increasingly used to facilitate breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in patients with early-stage and locally advanced breast cancer. However, tumour response to NACT is heterogeneous, and comparative studies have reported higher rates of margin involvement and re-excision compared with primary surgery. Despite its clinical significance, the incidence of positive margins and rates of re-excision remain incompletely defined. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched for studies reporting tumour-on-ink margin positivity following BCS after NACT. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to estimate pooled rates of margin positivity and re-excision. Seven retrospective cohort studies comprising 3962 patients were included, with six studies (3855 patients) eligible for quantitative synthesis. The pooled tumour-on-ink margin positivity rate following index BCS after NACT was 9.7% (95% CI 5.8-13.6%). The pooled re-excision rate was 14.0% (95% CI 0.0-30.6%), with substantial between-study heterogeneity. Re-excision rates varied widely, likely reflecting differences in institutional practice and thresholds for reoperation. Residual DCIS and invasive lobular carcinoma were the clinicopathological features most consistently associated with higher rates of margin positivity and re-excision. Tumour-on-ink margin positivity following BCS after NACT is comparable to that reported following primary surgery, while re-excision rates are higher and more variable. Improved risk stratification may assist surgical planning and patient counselling following NACT.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.