Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Robotic TME reduces CRM positivity and three-year recurrence in mid or low rectal cancerRobotic surgery shows benefits for rectal cancer

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider robotic TME may improve surgical margins and reduce short-term recurrence, but interpret oncologic outcomes cautiously due to low event rates.

This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing robotic total mesorectal excision (TME) to laparoscopic TME in patients with mid or low rectal adenocarcinoma (tumour height of 10 cm or less from the anal verge). The analysis included 1,952 patients with a three-year follow-up. The meta-analysis found robotic TME was associated with reduced circumferential resection margin positivity (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.87), increased completeness of the mesorectum (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.14 to 2.12), and less frequent conversion to open surgery (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.79). For three-year oncologic outcomes, robotic TME was associated with lower locoregional recurrence (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.81) and a modest improvement in disease-free survival (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.99), while overall survival showed no difference (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.11). No difference was found for intraoperative and early postoperative complications. The authors acknowledge that event rates were low and estimates for three-year oncologic outcomes should be interpreted cautiously. Practice relevance was not reported.

This research combined results from several randomized trials to compare robotic and laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer. The analysis included 1,952 patients with tumors 10 cm or less from the anal verge. The review found that robotic surgery was associated with a lower rate of positive surgical margins and a more complete removal of the rectal tissue. It also found that robotic surgery led to fewer conversions to open surgery and a lower rate of cancer recurrence after three years. There was no difference in complications during surgery or in overall survival. The main reason to be careful is that the number of events for the three-year cancer outcomes was low, so these findings should be interpreted cautiously. Readers should understand that this is a summary of existing trials and does not prove that robotic surgery is better for every patient.

What this means for you:
Robotic surgery may improve some rectal cancer outcomes, but the evidence is limited and needs more study.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
Sample sizen = 1,952
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedJun 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Total mesorectal excision (TME) for mid and low rectal cancer is technically demanding, and resection quality strongly influences local control and survival. Robotic platforms may offer technical advantages over conventional laparoscopy, but oncologic benefits remain uncertain. This meta-analysis evaluates resection quality and early oncologic outcomes using evidence exclusively from randomised trials. A PRISMA aligned systematic review of MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL and Google Scholar was performed to 22 September 2025. Eligible studies were parallel-group randomised controlled trials comparing robotic with laparoscopic TME for mid or low rectal adenocarcinoma, defined as tumour height of 10 cm or less from the anal verge. Co-primary outcomes were circumferential resection margin (CRM) positivity and completeness of the mesorectum. Secondary outcomes included conversion to open surgery, intraoperative complications, and three-year locoregional recurrence, disease-free survival, and overall survival. Odds ratios and hazard ratios were pooled using random effects models. Four randomised trials met inclusion, enrolling 1,952 patients. Robotic TME reduced CRM positivity (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.87) and increased complete TME rates (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.14 to 2.12). Conversion to open surgery was less frequent with robotics (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.79). Intraoperative and early postoperative complications did not differ. Two trials reported three-year oncologic outcomes. Robotic TME was associated with lower three-year locoregional recurrence (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.23-0.81) and a modest improvement in disease-free survival (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.61-0.99), although event rates were low and estimates should be interpreted cautiously. Overall survival did not differ (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.57-1.11). In mid and low rectal cancer, robotic TME was associated with improved pathological resection quality and lower conversion rates compared with laparoscopic TME, without clear differences in early perioperative morbidity There is emerging evidence of improved three-year locoregional recurrence and disease-free survival.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.