Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Sex and gender-tailored screening strategies aim to address disparities in colorectal cancer detection and participationExperts identify ways to improve colorectal cancer screening for everyone

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider sex-disaggregated data and tailored communication to address gender-specific barriers in colorectal cancer screening.

This consensus study evaluates the clinical relevance and potential of sex and gender-tailored colorectal cancer screening strategies. The scope of the consensus includes identifying disparities in incidence, age at onset, lesion distribution, and barriers to screening between men and women. The authors highlight that significant disparities exist across these metrics, which may impact the effectiveness of current screening programs.

Key recommendations from the expert panel include the importance of collecting and analyzing sex-disaggregated data to better understand patient needs. The authors advocate for tailored communication strategies to address gender-specific barriers and suggest that research should investigate potential differences in optimal screening age and modality. These findings aim to improve equity and effectiveness in colorectal cancer screening programs.

Limitations noted by the authors include existing knowledge gaps regarding specific sex- and gender-related differences in colorectal cancer. The clinical relevance of these findings lies in the development of actionable recommendations to improve screening uptake and outcomes. Because this is a consensus study based on expert discussion and literature review, the findings should be interpreted as a framework for improving program equity rather than as results from a primary clinical trial.

How this fits prior evidence

This consensus study addresses a gap in current screening equity by identifying sex and gender-specific barriers to colorectal cancer screening. While prior coverage noted that patient navigation and mailed FIT outreach are effective strategies to increase screening uptake, this consensus adds a layer of tailored communication and sex-disaggregated data analysis to improve equity. It does not directly relate to the findings regarding AI-assisted colonoscopy, gut microbiota, physical exercise, or SCRT plus ICI in rectal cancer.

Men and women often face different hurdles when it comes to getting screened for colorectal cancer. These differences can affect how often they get tested, the age at which they develop cancer, and the specific types of growths they develop. Because of these differences, a one-size-fits-all approach to screening might not be the most effective way to reach everyone.

Experts recently met to discuss how to make screening programs fairer and more effective. They found that we need to collect and look at data specifically separated by sex and gender. By doing this, doctors can better understand the unique barriers each group faces. This helps them create communication strategies that speak directly to the concerns of both men and women.

While the experts agreed on the need for more tailored communication and research, they also noted that there are still gaps in our current knowledge. Because this was a consensus based on existing literature and expert discussion rather than a new clinical trial, more research is needed to find the best screening methods for everyone.

What this means for you:
Tailoring colorectal cancer screening to specific sex and gender needs can help overcome barriers and improve equity.

Common questions

Why is it important to have different screening strategies for men and women?

Men and women show significant differences in colorectal cancer, including the age they are diagnosed and the types of lesions they develop. They also face different barriers to getting screened. Tailoring communication and screening methods to these specific differences helps make programs more effective and fair for everyone.

What are the main goals of these new recommendations?

The goal is to improve equity and effectiveness in screening programs. Experts recommend collecting sex-disaggregated data and creating communication strategies that address gender-specific barriers. This helps ensure that both men and women have the best chance at early detection and treatment.

Is this new approach based on a clinical trial?

No, these findings come from a consensus study based on a literature review and expert panel discussions. While the experts agree on the importance of tailored screening, they noted that there are still gaps in our current knowledge regarding sex and gender differences in colorectal cancer.

Study Details

Study typeGuideline
EvidenceLevel 5
PublishedJul 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
IntroductionGender medicine in oncology focuses on understanding the differences in cancer incidence, progression and responses to oncological treatments between men and women. Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a paradigmatic example of sex and gender disparities in incidence and prevalence, age of onset, pathogenesis, tumour location and responses to oncological treatments. However, despite growing evidence of these differences, there are no current clinical recommendations based on sex and gender, nor are there differentiated diagnostic-therapeutic pathways.MethodsThe objective of this consensus study was to identify areas of expert agreement regarding the potential appropriateness and clinical relevance of sex and gender-tailored colorectal cancer screening strategies on the basis of currently available evidence. A comprehensive literature review was conducted in order to examine any existing evidence on sex-and gender-related differences in CRC. Publications that were included in this review were manually searched in PubMed/Medline by using different combinations of relevant keywords. Based on synthesised evidence, a multidisciplinary panel of experts convened to develop consensus statements using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method.ResultsThe findings highlighted significant disparities between men and women in incidence, age at onset, lesion distribution, participation rates, and barriers to screening, hence supporting the need for a more tailored approach in CRC screening strategies. Through a structured rating process and iterative discussion, the panel formulated a set of statements and actionable recommendations to enhance equity and effectiveness in CRC screening programs.DiscussionCore statements emphasize the importance of collecting and analysing sex-disaggregated data in screening registries, promoting further research to address existing knowledge gaps, tailoring communication strategies to gender-specific barriers and facilitators to improve screening adherence, considering potential differences between men and women in the optimal age and modality for CRC screening, within a framework of personalized and precision medicine.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.