Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

High tumour-associated neutrophils at the invasive margin are associated with improved overall survivalNeutrophils at Tumor Edge Linked to Better Colon Cancer Survival

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that high TANs at the invasive margin are associated with improved OS, while results for the tumour core were not significant.

This meta-analysis evaluated the prognostic implications of tumour-associated neutrophils (TANs) in patients diagnosed with stages I-IV colorectal cancer (CRC). The study included a total sample size of 7,406 patients. The analysis specifically examined the location of these cells—distinguishing between those located at the invasive margin (IM) and those within the tumour core (TC)—to determine their impact on patient outcomes.

The primary outcome measured was overall survival (OS). For patients with high TANs at the invasive margin (IM), the study reported a statistically significant association with improved OS, yielding an HR of 0.64 (95% CI 0.50-0.81, I^2 = 48%). In contrast, for patients with high TANs at the tumour core (TC), there was a trend toward better OS, but the results were not statistically significant, with an HR of 0.82 (95% CI 0.61-1.10, I^2 = 83%).

Secondary outcomes included disease-free survival (DFS). Similar to the primary outcome, high TANs at the invasive margin were associated with improved DFS, reporting an HR of 0.47 (95% CI 0.25-0.88, I^2 = 32%). For patients with high TANs at the tumour core, there was a trend toward better DFS, but this did not reach statistical significance, with an HR of 0.48 (95% CI 0.21-1.07, I^2 = 93%).

Safety and tolerability data were not reported in the study as it was a meta-analysis of observational outcomes rather than a clinical trial involving intervention administration. The analysis highlights a distinct difference in prognostic value based on the anatomical location of the neutrophils within the tumor microenvironment.

Methodologically, the study noted high heterogeneity at the tumour core (TC) for both OS and DFS metrics. This suggests that while the invasive margin provides a clearer signal for prognosis, the data regarding the tumour core are less consistent across the included studies.

These findings suggest that the location of neutrophils within the tumor microenvironment may be a relevant prognostic indicator in colorectal cancer. Specifically, high TANs at the invasive margin correlate with improved survival outcomes, whereas results for the tumour core were not statistically significant. This distinction may help clinicians better interpret the role of the immune microenvironment in CRC.

Several questions remain regarding the biological mechanisms driving these differences between the invasive margin and the tumour core. Furthermore, while the association is clear at the invasive margin, more data are needed to determine if this finding holds across diverse subtypes of colorectal cancer or different staging protocols.

How this fits prior evidence

How this fits prior evidence: This meta-analysis addresses a gap in understanding the role of the tumor microenvironment in colorectal cancer. While previous findings noted that antibiotic exposure is associated with an 18.7% higher risk of gastrointestinal cancers, and gut microbiome biomarkers show an AUROC of 0.89 for differentiating colorectal cancer from controls, this study specifically focuses on the prognostic value of tumour-associated neutrophils (TANs). It provides specific evidence regarding how the location of these cells—specifically at the invasive margin versus the tumour core—impacts overall survival and disease-free survival.

A recent meta-analysis looked at how a type of immune cell called tumor-associated neutrophils (TANs) affects survival in people with colorectal cancer. The study combined data from multiple earlier studies, covering over 7,400 patients with stages I through IV colorectal cancer. The researchers focused on two locations within the tumor: the invasive margin (the edge where the tumor meets healthy tissue) and the tumor core (the center of the tumor). They wanted to see if having more TANs in these areas was linked to better overall survival and disease-free survival.

The results showed that patients with high levels of TANs at the invasive margin had about a 36% lower chance of dying during the study period compared to those with low levels. They also had about a 53% lower chance of their cancer coming back. These findings were statistically significant, meaning they are unlikely to be due to chance. However, when the researchers looked at TANs in the tumor core, they found a trend toward better survival, but the results were not strong enough to be considered statistically significant. This means that while there might be a benefit, the evidence is not as clear.

The study had some limitations. The results for the tumor core showed high variability across the different studies, which makes it harder to draw firm conclusions. Also, this type of analysis can only show an association, not prove that TANs directly cause better outcomes. Other factors, such as the overall immune response or other treatments, could also play a role.

For patients and doctors, these findings suggest that looking at TANs at the invasive margin might help predict how well someone will do. It could also point to new ways to boost the immune system's fight against cancer. However, more research is needed before this can be used in routine care. The study did not report on side effects or funding sources, so those aspects remain unclear.

In summary, this meta-analysis provides evidence that immune cells at the edge of a colorectal tumor are linked to better survival. While the results are promising, they are not yet ready to change clinical practice. Patients should discuss their individual situation with their healthcare team.

What this means for you:
High levels of neutrophils at the tumor edge are linked to better survival in colorectal cancer.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
Sample sizen = 7,406
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedJul 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
PURPOSE: Neutrophils are at the forefront of innate immune response. The prognostic impact of tumour-associated neutrophils (TANs) remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic role of TANs in colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Scopus to identify studies correlating TANs with time-to-event survival analysis in patients with stages I-IV CRC from the date of inception until April 2024. Articles were included if they involved the identification of TANs through hematoxylin-eosin (HE) or immunohistochemistry (IHC) and reported survival analysis. Data was collected from the tumour core (TC) and invasive margin (IM). The hazard ratios (HRs) were extracted from the study results. Heterogeneity was evaluated using Cochran's Q and I². Primary and secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: Of 4,292 citations found, 18 studies fulfilled eligibility criteria, encompassing 7,406 patients. IHC was used to identify TANs in 12 trials, while six performed HE. Five studies included patients with disease stages I-III, and 13 had stages I-IV. High TANs at the IM were associated with improved OS (HR = 0.64, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.50-0.81, I = 48%) and DFS (HR = 0.47, 95% CI 0.25-0.88, I = 32%). At the TC, high TANs showed a trend towards better OS (HR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.61-1.10, I = 83%) and DFS (HR = 0.48, 95% CI 0.21-1.07, I = 93%), although not statistically significant and with high heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, high TANs at the invasive margin (IM), the tumour-host interface, was associated with improved prognosis in CRC. In contrast, no statistically significant association was observed for high TANs at the tumour core (TC).
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.