Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Laparoscopic-endoscopic cooperative full-thickness resection achieves pT3 excision with no recurrence at 21 monthsNew technique removes colon cancer without cutting open the abdomen

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider laparoscopic-endoscopic full-thickness resection only as an investigational option, not a standard alternative.

This is a case report of a 61-year-old man with a history of rectal cancer surgery who presented with a recurrent lesion in the transverse colon. The intervention was a laparoscopic-endoscopic cooperative full-thickness resection, a minimally invasive technique aimed at definitive excision while preserving bowel continuity.

Pathological assessment of the resected specimen revealed a moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma extending into the subserosa (pT3), with negative margins, low-grade tumor budding, no lymphovascular or perineural invasion, and retained mismatch repair protein expression. At 21 months of follow-up, no recurrence was detected.

The authors note that occult nodal disease cannot be excluded, which is a key limitation of this approach. They emphasize that this technique should not be considered an alternative to standard oncologic surgery, which typically includes lymph node dissection.

Given the single-patient nature of this report, the findings are hypothesis-generating rather than definitive. Clinicians should interpret these results with caution and consider standard surgical approaches for recurrent colorectal lesions unless further evidence supports the oncologic safety of this technique.

When cancer comes back after surgery, the usual fix is another operation. But for one man, doctors tried something less invasive: a combined scope procedure that removed the tumor from the inside, without a single cut on his belly.

The 61-year-old had already had rectal cancer surgery. Then a new tumor appeared in his transverse colon. Instead of standard surgery, he underwent a laparoscopic-endoscopic cooperative full-thickness resection. That means doctors used a camera and a scope to remove the entire thickness of the colon wall where the cancer was.

The removed tissue showed a moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma that had grown into the subserosa, the outer layer of the colon. That's stage pT3. But the margins were clean, meaning no cancer cells were left behind. The tumor had low-grade budding, no invasion into lymph or blood vessels, and normal mismatch repair proteins.

At 21 months, there was no sign of the cancer coming back. That's encouraging, but this is just one person's story. Doctors can't be sure no cancer cells are hiding in nearby lymph nodes. So this approach is not a replacement for standard cancer surgery. It's a possible option for certain patients, but more research is needed.

What this means for you:
A less invasive scope technique removed a recurrent colon cancer with no recurrence at 21 months, but it's not a standard alternative.

Common questions

What is laparoscopic-endoscopic cooperative full-thickness resection?

It's a procedure that combines a laparoscope (a small camera through a tiny cut) and an endoscope (a tube through the mouth or anus) to remove a tumor from the colon wall. In this case, it removed the full thickness of the colon where the cancer was, without a large abdominal incision.

Is this procedure a replacement for standard colon cancer surgery?

No. The report clearly states it should not be considered an alternative to standard oncologic surgery. Standard surgery also removes nearby lymph nodes to check for spread. This technique doesn't do that, so it's not for everyone.

What were the findings after the tumor was removed?

The tumor was a moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma that had grown into the subserosa (pT3). The margins were negative, meaning no cancer cells at the edges. There was low-grade tumor budding, no lymphovascular or perineural invasion, and normal mismatch repair proteins.

Did the cancer come back after this procedure?

In this case, no recurrence was detected at 21 months of follow-up. However, this is just one patient, and the report notes that occult nodal disease (cancer in lymph nodes that isn't visible) cannot be excluded.

Study Details

Study typeSystematic review
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedAug 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
A 61-year-old man with a history of rectal cancer surgery developed a recurrent lesion in the transverse colon after repeated endoscopic resections. Histopathology initially showed high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and subsequently intramucosal adenocarcinoma with negative deep margins, yet the lesion recurred within 1 month. Histopathological initially showed high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and subsequently later intramucosal adenocarcinoma with negative deep margins, yet the lesion recurred within 1 month. At our institution, colonoscopy demonstrated a 2.0 cm elevated lesion, whereas cross-sectional imaging revealed neither regional lymphadenopathy nor distant metastatic disease. Because the rapid recurrence was inconsistent with the apparently favorable pathological findings, laparoscopic-endoscopic cooperative full-thickness resection was undertaken to achieve definitive excision and pathological assessment while maintaining bowel continuity. Examination of the resected specimen disclosed moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma extending into the subserosa (pT3), with negative margins, low-grade tumor budding, no lymphovascular or perineural invasion, and retained mismatch repair protein expression. Although oncologic colectomy with regional lymphadenectomy remains the standard treatment for pT3 colon cancer, completion colectomy was omitted after multidisciplinary review and shared decision-making. This exceptional decision reflected the absence of radiographic nodal or distant disease, favorable pathological features, the patient’s previous ultra-low colorectal anastomosis, the anticipated functional burden of further surgery, and his informed preference. At approximately 21 months of follow-up, no recurrence had been detected. However, occult nodal disease cannot be excluded, and this approach should not be considered an alternative to standard oncologic surgery.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.