Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

SGRT and OSMS assisted DIBH reduces heart and LAD doses in left-sided breast radiotherapySurface Guided Radiotherapy May Lower Heart Dose in Breast Cancer

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that SGRT/OSMS assisted DIBH reduces heart and LAD doses in left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy.

This systematic review and meta-analysis of 52 studies evaluated the impact of surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT) or optical surface monitoring systems (OSMS) assisted deep-inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) compared to free breathing (FB) for patients with left-sided breast cancer. The primary analysis focused on dosimetric outcomes, specifically heart dose, left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery dose, and ipsilateral lung dose.

The meta-analysis found that SGRT/OSMS assisted DIBH resulted in a mean heart dose reduction of 1.21 Gy (95% CI -1.48 to -0.93) and a mean LAD dose reduction of 7.05 Gy (95% CI -9.39 to -4.71). Additionally, the mean ipsilateral lung dose was lower by 0.88 Gy (95% CI -1.34 to -0.42), and the ipsilateral lung V20 was lower by 2.30 percentage points (95% CI -3.27 to -1.32).

Regarding secondary outcomes, no statistically significant pooled differences were found between groups for image-verified setup errors (3D-vector, LR/LAT, SI/LNG/CC, AP/VRT). The authors note that the lack of a statistically significant difference in setup errors does not establish equivalence or non-inferiority. These findings suggest that SGRT/OSMS assisted DIBH may offer dosimetric benefits for left-sided breast cancer patients, though setup accuracy remains comparable to standard workflows.

How this fits prior evidence

This meta-analysis addresses a gap in optimizing dosimetric outcomes for left-sided breast cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy. While previous coverage has focused on perioperative anxiety, surgical margins, and drug resistance mechanisms, this study specifically addresses the technical integration of SGRT and OSMS to reduce cardiac and pulmonary radiation exposure.

A large review of 52 studies looked at how different radiation techniques affect patients with left-sided breast cancer. The researchers compared a method using surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT) with a deep-inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) against standard free breathing.

The findings showed that the surface-guided method was associated with lower radiation doses to the heart, the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD), and the left lung. Specifically, the heart dose was lower by 1.21 Gy, and the LAD dose was lower by 7.05 Gy. These measurements help track how much radiation reaches vital organs during treatment.

While the study showed lower doses for these areas, it did not find a significant difference in the accuracy of the patient's position during setup. Because this is a meta-analysis of many studies, it shows a link between the technique and lower doses but does not prove a direct cause. Patients should talk to their doctors about how these specific radiation techniques might apply to their individual treatment plans.

What this means for you:
Surface-guided monitoring during radiation for left-sided breast cancer is linked to lower doses to the heart and lungs.

Common questions

How does this technique affect the heart during radiation?

The study found that using surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT) with a deep-inspiration breath-hold was associated with a lower mean heart dose of 1.21 Gy compared to free breathing. This helps reduce the amount of radiation reaching the heart in patients with left-sided breast cancer.

Does this method protect the coronary arteries?

Yes, the data showed a lower dose to the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD). The mean dose was lower by 7.05 Gy when using the surface-guided method compared to free breathing. You should discuss these specific findings with your oncology team.

Is the setup accuracy different with this method?

The study did not find a statistically significant difference in setup errors between the two methods. While the surface-guided method showed lower radiation doses to the heart and lungs, the accuracy of the patient's position during setup was similar to the standard method.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedSep 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BackgroundDeep-inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) reduces cardiac and pulmonary radiation exposure during radiotherapy for left-sided breast cancer. Surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT) and optical surface monitoring systems (OSMS) can support patient positioning and breath-hold monitoring, but evidence specific to SGRT/OSMS-assisted DIBH workflows remains fragmented.MethodsPubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched from inception to May 21, 2026. Studies using SGRT/OSMS-assisted DIBH and reporting extractable dosimetric or image-verified setup outcomes were eligible. Effects were expressed as mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs); dosimetric MDs were defined as SGRT/OSMS-assisted DIBH minus FB, with negative values indicating lower doses. Random-effects meta-analyses were used for dosimetric and comparative setup outcomes, whereas single-arm setup data were pooled separately.ResultsA total of 52 studies were included. Compared with free breathing (FB), SGRT/OSMS-assisted DIBH was associated with lower mean heart dose (MD = -1.21 Gy, 95% CI -1.48 to -0.93), mean left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) dose (MD = -7.05 Gy, 95% CI -9.39 to -4.71), ipsilateral (left) lung mean dose (MD = -0.88 Gy, 95% CI -1.34 to -0.42), and ipsilateral lung V20 (MD = -2.30 percentage points, 95% CI -3.27 to -1.32). Comparative meta-analyses found no statistically significant pooled between-group differences in image-verified 3D-vector, left-right/lateral (LR/LAT), superior-inferior/longitudinal/craniocaudal (SI/LNG/CC), or anterior-posterior/vertical (AP/VRT) residual setup errors; this finding does not establish equivalence or non-inferiority. Sensitivity analyses generally supported the main conclusions, although the magnitude of the ipsilateral lung V20 effect was sensitive to the statistical model.ConclusionsSGRT/OSMS-assisted DIBH was associated with lower cardiac, LAD, and ipsilateral lung doses in left-sided breast radiotherapy. Comparative setup analyses found no statistically significant pooled differences from the comparator workflows reported in the primary studies; this does not establish equivalence or non-inferiority. Current evidence supports SGRT/OSMS for external positioning, real-time DIBH monitoring, and quality assurance, while appropriate internal image verification should be retained according to target complexity, the SGRT system, and the local quality assurance program.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420261439818, identifier CRD420261439818.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.