This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based treatments in patients with EGFR L858R-mutated non-small cell lung cancer who had developed resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors. The analysis included data from 1,154 patients in a post-TKI setting, comparing ICI-based regimens against chemotherapy. The primary outcome assessed was progression-free survival (PFS), with secondary outcomes including objective response rate and overall survival.
Results indicated that ICI-based treatments significantly improved PFS compared with chemotherapy, with a hazard ratio of 0.63 (95% CI: 0.44-0.90; P = 0.01). However, ICI monotherapy failed to confer a PFS benefit, showing a hazard ratio of 1.68 (95% CI: 0.94-2.99; P = 0.08). Combination therapies, particularly those incorporating anti-angiogenic agents and chemotherapy, demonstrated optimal PFS benefits with a hazard ratio of 0.50 (P = 0.01). Additionally, combination regimens yielded higher objective response rates and PFS than monotherapy.
Safety data, including adverse events, serious adverse events, discontinuations, and tolerability, were not reported in the pooled analysis. Key limitations include the potential obscuring of immunobiological heterogeneity in prior studies that analyzed exon 19 deletions and L858R mutations in aggregate. Furthermore, pooled results from single-arm studies should not be interpreted as definitive evidence of efficacy, as these are descriptive and exploratory rather than comparative. Randomized controlled trials provide more robust comparative estimates.
For clinicians managing EGFR-TKI-resistant, L858R-mutated NSCLC, this evidence suggests that ICI monotherapy appears ineffective. Conversely, ICI-based combinations, particularly the four-drug regimen incorporating anti-angiogenic agents, significantly delay disease progression and improve response rates in this specific population.
View Original Abstract ↓
The application of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) resistance remains controversial. Prior studies often obscured immunobiological heterogeneity by analyzing exon 19 deletions and L858R mutations in aggregate. This study conducts the first meta-analysis specifically focusing on the EGFR L858R subtype to systematically evaluate ICI efficacy (monotherapy vs. combinations) in the post-TKI setting.
We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Web of Science (up to January 1, 2026) for studies on ICI-treated EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Prospective or retrospective studies explicitly reporting L858R data were selected. Primary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR); the secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Given that our meta-analysis includes both randomized controlled trials and single-arm studies, we explicitly stratified analyses by study design. RCTs provide comparative estimates, whereas single-arm studies are descriptive and exploratory; pooled results from single-arm studies should not be interpreted as definitive evidence of efficacy. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated using a random-effects model, stratified by treatment modality.
Seventeen studies involving 1, 154 patients were included. Compared with chemotherapy, ICI-based treatments significantly improved PFS [HR = 0.63, 95% confidence intervals (CI):0.44-0.90, P = 0.01]. Subgroup analysis revealed significant disparities: ICI monotherapy failed to confer a PFS benefit (HR = 1.68, 95% CI:0.94-2.99, P = 0.08), whereas combination therapies were effective. Exploratory analyses from non-comparative single-arm studies supported these trends, showing higher ORR and PFS for combination regimens than for monotherapy. Notably, the “ICI plus anti-angiogenic agents plus chemotherapy” regimen exhibited the optimal PFS benefit (HR = 0.50, P
For EGFR-TKI-resistant, L858R-mutated NSCLC, ICI monotherapy appears ineffective. Conversely, ICI-based combinations—particularly the four-drug regimen incorporating anti-angiogenic agents—significantly delay disease progression and improve response rates. Future research should prioritize prospective studies and novel agents, such as antibody-drug conjugates, to improve long-term survival.
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/, identifier CRD420261278330.