Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

CT-defined coronary artery calcification shows no significant association with survival in advanced gastric cancerCoronary Artery Calcification Scores Do Not Predict Gastric Cancer Survival

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that CT-defined coronary artery calcification has no significant prognostic impact on survival in advanced gastric cancer.

This secondary analysis of a phase III trial evaluated the prognostic value of CT-defined coronary artery calcification (CAC) in 785 patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer. The study assessed both continuous and dichotomized CAC scores as predictors of overall survival (OS) in patients undergoing first-line chemotherapy.

Analysis of CAC as a continuous value showed no significant association with survival (HR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.96-1.02, p = 0.74). Similarly, dichotomized CAC scores (presence/absence) showed no significant association with survival (HR: 1.08; 95% CI: 0.92-1.26, p = 0.34). While male patients had statistically significant higher median CAC scores compared to female patients (Median 1 vs 0, p < 0.0001), these scores did not correlate with clinical outcomes.

Safety and tolerability data were not reported. A primary limitation of this study is that it is a secondary analysis of baseline CT images. Consequently, CT-defined CAC scoring does not appear to have a relevant prognostic impact for patients with advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer undergoing first-line chemotherapy.

How this fits prior evidence

How this fits prior evidence: This finding addresses a gap in prognostic markers for gastric cancer. While prior evidence identified elevated pretreatment SII as a potential prognostic marker in gastric cancer, this study indicates that CT-defined coronary artery calcification (CAC) does not have a relevant prognostic impact in advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer. The results do not impact the findings regarding apatinib-based neoadjuvant regimens or the survival outcomes of older patients with gastric cancer.

Researchers performed a secondary analysis of a phase 3 trial involving 785 patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer. The study looked at coronary artery calcification (CAC) scores, which are measured using CT scans to look at the heart's arteries. The goal was to see if these scores could help predict how long patients would live while undergoing first-line chemotherapy.

The results showed that while male patients had significantly higher CAC scores than female patients, the actual score did not correlate with survival. Whether the calcification was measured as a continuous number or simply as being present or absent, there was no significant link to the length of time patients lived.

Because this was a secondary analysis of baseline images, the findings are specific to this study group. For patients with advanced gastric or esophageal junction cancer, these heart scores do not currently provide useful information for predicting outcomes. Patients should continue to discuss their specific treatment plans and prognosis with their oncology team.

What this means for you:
Coronary artery calcification scores do not appear to predict survival for patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Common questions

What is coronary artery calcification (CAC)?

Coronary artery calcification refers to the buildup of calcium in the heart's arteries. In this study, researchers used CT scans to calculate a CAC score. While the study found that men had significantly higher scores than women (median 1 vs 0), these scores did not change the predicted survival for patients with gastric or esophageal junction cancer.

Does a high heart calcium score affect cancer treatment?

In this specific study of 785 patients, the heart's calcium score did not have a significant association with survival. Whether the score was measured as a continuous value or just as the presence of calcium, it did not impact the outcome for patients undergoing first-line chemotherapy. You should talk to your doctor about your specific treatment.

Who was included in this study?

The study included 785 patients who had unresectable locally advanced or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer. The researchers looked at these patients' baseline CT images to see if heart health markers could help predict their survival during chemotherapy.

Study Details

Study typeRct
Sample sizen = 785
EvidenceLevel 2
PublishedNov 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
PURPOSE: Computed tomography (CT) is the clinical standard for staging of gastrointestinal cancer. Previous studies have highlighted the prognostic significance of coronary artery calcification (CAC) detected by CT in various types of cancer. However, the prognostic role of CAC scoring in gastrointestinal cancers is still unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of CT-defined CAC on overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer. METHODS: CAC was semiquantitatively measured using the visual Weston method on baseline CT scans in 785 patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer from the phase III EXPAND trial. This present study is a secondary analysis of the base line CT images. In the original analysis patients were randomly assigned to first-line treatment with cisplatin/capecitabin ± cetuximab. The primary endpoint of the current subanalysis is the OS. For statistical analysis group differences were calculated using the Mann-Whitney-U test and ANOVA test. Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable Cox regression analysis were used to test the effect of CAC on mortality. RESULTS: The median CAC score was 1 (IQR 0; 3). A total of 337 patients (42.9%) had no visible CAC (CAC score 0). Male patients had statistically significant higher CAC score compared to female patients (median 1 versus 0, p < 0.0001). In univariable Cox regression CAC showed no significant association with survival when analysed as a continuous value (HR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.96-1.02, p = 0.74), and when dichotomized for absence and presence of calcification (HR:1.08, 95% CI: 0.92-1.26, p = 0.34). Similar results were identified in further subgroup analyses. CONCLUSION: CT-defined CAC scoring has no relevant prognostic impact in advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer undergoing first-line chemotherapy. The present study cannot confirm the promising results for CAC scoring in lung cancer patients.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.