Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

XEN-only surgery achieves lower postoperative IOP than trabeculectomy but has higher bleb needling ratesNew analysis compares surgical options for open angle glaucoma

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that XEN-only surgery offers lower IOP than trabeculectomy but carries a significantly higher risk of bleb needling.

This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesized data from 56 studies to compare XEN-only, Phaco-XEN, and trabeculectomy (TB) procedures in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG). The analysis focused on intraocular pressure (IOP), number of anti-glaucoma medications (NOAM), and bleb needling rates.

Key findings indicate no statistically significant differences between XEN-only and Phaco-XEN procedures regarding postoperative IOP (MD: -0.22; p = 0.06), NOAM (MD: 0.10; p = 0.06), or bleb needling rates (RR: 1.79; p = 0.06). However, when comparing XEN-only to trabeculectomy, XEN-only showed a lower postoperative IOP (MD: -0.93; p = 0.0003) but a significantly higher rate of bleb needling (RR: 3.09; p = 0.001). No significant difference was found between XEN-only and trabeculectomy regarding NOAM (MD: -0.16; p = 0.16).

The authors note extremely high heterogeneity (I-squared = 86%) for the IOP comparison between XEN-only and trabeculectomy, which necessitates caution when interpreting the magnitude of IOP reduction. Clinically, while both XEN-only and Phaco-XEN are effective for IOP reduction, trabeculectomy is superior regarding lower postoperative bleb needling rates compared to XEN-only surgery.

How this fits prior evidence

This meta-analysis addresses a gap in comparing surgical interventions for open-angle glaucoma. While previous evidence has focused on medical management such as netarsudil and tafluprost-timolol fixed-dose combinations, this study provides data on surgical alternatives. It specifically highlights the trade-off between IOP reduction and bleb needling rates when choosing between XEN-only and trabeculectomy.

Living with open-angle glaucoma means managing eye pressure to protect your vision. When surgery becomes an option, doctors often choose between procedures like XEN-only or Phaco-XEN and a traditional method called trabeculectomy. A review of 56 studies looked at how these options compare for patients.

The data shows that both XEN-only and Phaco-XEN surgeries are effective at lowering eye pressure. In fact, there was no significant difference in pressure or the number of medications needed between those two specific methods. However, when comparing XEN-only to trabeculectomy, the results were more mixed. While XEN-only showed lower pressure numbers, it also had a significantly higher rate of bleb needling, which is a procedure used when a surgical site becomes blocked.

Because of high variation in the data for some comparisons, these findings should be viewed with caution. Ultimately, both XEN and Phaco-XEN are effective ways to lower pressure, but trabeculectomy may offer a lower risk of needing bleb needling later on. Talk to your doctor about which path fits your specific needs.

What this means for you:
Both XEN and Phaco-XEN surgeries effectively lower eye pressure, but trabeculectomy may result in fewer complications.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedJan 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: The comparative efficacy of XEN gel stent implantation, either as a standalone procedure (XEN-only) or combined with phacoemulsification (Phaco-XEN), for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma (OAG) warrants further investigation. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of XEN-only and Phaco-XEN procedures compared to trabeculectomy (TB). METHODS: Five major electronic databases, including PubMed, ScienceDirect, and the Cochrane Library, were systematically searched from inception to September 1, 2025. We compared clinical outcomes among XEN-only, Phaco-XEN, and TB groups. Stratification analyses examined outcomes based on follow-up duration and geographic location. Efficacy endpoints included intraocular pressure (IOP), number of anti-glaucoma medications (NOAM), and bleb needling rates. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess potential biases. RESULTS: A total of 56 eligible studies were included. (1) Both XEN-only and Phaco-XEN procedures achieved significant IOP reductions from baseline ( < 0.001). When comparing XEN-only versus Phaco-XEN, no statistically significant differences were observed in postoperative IOP (MD: -0.22;  = 0.06), NOAM (MD: 0.10;  = 0.06), or bleb needling rates (RR: 1.79;  = 0.06). (2) Compared with trabeculectomy (TB), there was no significant difference in postoperative NOAM for XEN-only (MD: -0.16;  = 0.16), but XEN-only had lower postoperative IOP (MD: -0.93;  = 0.0003). However, extremely high heterogeneity (  = 86%) suggests this finding should be interpreted with caution. Conversely, XEN-only surgery was associated with a significantly higher rate of bleb needling compared to TB surgery (RR: 3.09;  = 0.001). Hyphema and bleb needling were identified as the most frequent postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: Both XEN-only and Phaco-XEN surgeries provide effective IOP reduction. There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative NOAM reduction between XEN-only and Phaco-XEN surgeries ( = 0.06). TB surgery remains superior regarding lower postoperative bleb needling rates compared to XEN-only surgery.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.