Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

AI-assisted instruction provides diverse tools for undergraduate medical education clinical skills trainingAI Tools are Growing in Medical Student Clinical Training

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that AI tools currently serve as supplementary formative aids in medical education with limited long-term data.

This scoping review synthesizes 39 peer-reviewed studies from January 2022 to January 2026 to map the landscape of AI innovations in undergraduate medical education clinical skills curricula. The review identifies several distinct categories of implementation, with LLM-based virtual patient and clinical simulation systems being the most prevalent (n=19). Other identified technologies include AI-augmented OSCE and simulation assessment tools (n=6), embodied and robotic simulations (n=4), and procedural or technical skills training (n=3).

Additional categories identified include AI-assisted documentation and EHR-based skills (n=2), multimodal analytics for assessment (n=2), educator-facing case authoring tools (n=2), and clinical reasoning tutoring tools (n=1). These findings highlight a diverse range of applications, from student-facing simulations to educator-facing design tools.

While these technologies offer various ways to support clinical skills training, the authors note that robust evidence regarding long-term educational impact is currently limited. Consequently, AI is positioned as a supplementary formative tool rather than a replacement for established pedagogical approaches in medical education.

A scoping review examined 39 studies to identify how artificial intelligence is currently used in undergraduate medical education. The study looked at various ways AI helps students learn clinical skills, such as interacting with virtual patients or using robotics for simulation.

The most common uses found were LLM-based virtual patient systems and assessment tools. Other applications included training for technical procedures, clinical documentation, and reasoning support. While these technologies are becoming more common in classrooms, they are currently used to support existing teaching methods rather than replace them.

Because this was a scoping review of current literature, the results show how AI is being implemented today rather than proving its long-term success. Evidence regarding the long-term educational impact on students remains limited. For now, these tools serve as helpful additions to help medical students practice their skills in a controlled environment.

What this means for you:
AI tools are increasingly used as supportive training aids for medical students practicing clinical skills.

Common questions

What types of AI are being used to train medical students?

The study identified several types of AI tools. These include LLM-based virtual patient systems (19 studies), assessment tools (6 studies), robotic simulations (4 studies), and tools for technical skills, documentation, and clinical reasoning.

Is AI replacing human teachers in medical schools?

No, the evidence suggests that AI is currently used as a supplementary tool. It is intended to support existing teaching methods rather than replace the established ways of training students in clinical skills.

Does this mean AI is proven to make doctors better?

The study does not prove long-term outcomes. Because it was a scoping review, it only identifies how these tools are being used today. Evidence regarding the long-term educational impact on students remains limited.

Study Details

Study typeSystematic review
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedJun 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
To systematically identify and synthesize peer-reviewed literature describing implemented AI innovations within undergraduate medical education clinical skills curricula from January 2022 through January 2026. The authors conducted a scoping review querying PubMed and Scopus, supplemented by SciSpace as an AI-assisted citation discovery tool. Eligible studies described utilizing AI to deliver the clinical skills curriculum in innovative ways (e.g., instruction in history-taking, communication, clinical reasoning, clinical documentation, OSCE/simulation assessment). We extracted data into standardized templates and thematically sorted to characterize how AI-assisted instruction was being implemented across educational objectives. From 1,130 initial records, 39 studies met inclusion criteria. AI-assisted instruction clustered into eight thematic categories: LLM-Based Virtual Patient and Clinical Simulation Systems (n = 19), AI-Augmented OSCE and Simulation Assessment Tools (n = 6), Embodied and Robotic AI Clinical Simulations (n = 4), AI-Supported Procedural and Technical Skills Training (n = 3), AI-Assisted Clinical Documentation and EHR-Based Skills Training (n = 2), Multimodal Analytics for Skills Assessment (n = 2), Educator-Facing AI Case Authoring and Simulation Design Tools (n = 2), and AI-Supported Clinical Reasoning and Tutoring Tools (n = 1). Publication activity concentrated heavily in 2024–2025, with virtual patient applications representing the dominant category. AI implementation in clinical skills education has accelerated substantially since 2022, with large language model-powered virtual patient simulations emerging as the predominant application. Current implementations primarily position AI as a supplementary formative tool rather than a replacement for established pedagogical approaches. Robust evidence regarding long-term educational impact remains limited, indicating need for rigorous longitudinal evaluation alongside continued innovation.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.