Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

AI models demonstrate high sensitivity and specificity for detecting paediatric appendicular fractures on radiographsArtificial intelligence shows high accuracy detecting fractures in children

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that AI models show high sensitivity (0.92) and specificity (0.90) for detecting paediatric appendicular fractures.

This meta-analysis evaluates the performance of artificial intelligence and deep learning architectures in detecting paediatric appendicular fractures on plain radiographs. The analysis included 11 studies involving over 10,000 radiographs to compare AI models against human readers as the reference standard.

The pooled results indicate high diagnostic accuracy for AI models, with a sensitivity of 0.92 (95% CI: 0.89-0.94) and specificity of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.85-0.94). Specific findings included a sensitivity of 0.91 for upper extremity fractures, 0.89 for lower extremity fractures, and a specificity of 0.94 for lower extremity fractures. The diagnostic odds ratio was 104.6, with a positive likelihood ratio of 9.32 and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.089.

The authors noted several limitations, including the fact that many studies were retrospective or single-center, leading to limited external validation. While high discriminative ability was shown by HSROC curve performance, the meta-analysis of retrospective data does not establish causality. AI-assisted detection may support junior clinicians and reduce delays in identifying fractures, but current models are limited by a lack of robust prospective integration.

How this fits prior evidence

This meta-analysis extends prior evidence regarding deep learning for fracture classification and localization, which showed variable performance in cohort studies. While the previous finding noted that classification performance is limited and requires validation, this meta-analysis provides specific pooled metrics for detection accuracy in a paediatric population. It addresses a gap by providing high sensitivity and specificity values for appendicular fractures specifically.

When a child breaks a bone, every minute counts. Doctors need to spot these fractures quickly and accurately to start the right treatment. A large review of over 10,000 X-rays looked at how well artificial intelligence (AI) models can find these injuries in children.

The study found that AI showed high accuracy for both upper and lower limb fractures. Specifically, the AI had a sensitivity of 0.92 and a specificity of 0.90 overall. This means it was very effective at correctly identifying fractures while keeping false positives low. These results suggest that AI could be a helpful tool to support younger doctors or speed up diagnosis in busy clinics.

While the results are promising, there are some important notes. Most of the data came from older records rather than real-time tests, and many studies were done at only one hospital. Because of this limited outside testing, we don't yet know how these tools will perform in every different clinic setting. For now, AI is seen as a supportive tool to help doctors make better decisions.

What this means for you:
AI shows high accuracy in identifying children's bone fractures on X-rays and could help speed up diagnosis.

Common questions

How accurate is AI at finding broken bones in kids?

The study found that AI models had a high sensitivity of 0.92 and a specificity of 0.90 for detecting fractures in children's limbs. This means the technology was very effective at identifying injuries on X-rays while maintaining a low false-positive rate of 0.10.

Can AI help doctors find upper and lower limb fractures?

Yes, the data showed high accuracy for both types. For upper extremity fractures, the AI had a sensitivity of 0.91 and specificity of 0.89. For lower extremity fractures, it showed a sensitivity of 0.89 and a specificity of 0.94.

Is this technology ready to replace doctors for diagnosis?

Not yet. While the AI showed high accuracy, many of the studies were retrospective and lacked broad testing in different settings. It is currently viewed as a way to support junior clinicians and reduce delays rather than replacing human judgment.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
Follow-up252.0 mo
PublishedAug 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this review was to systematically evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI) models for detecting paediatric appendicular fractures on plain radiographs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This review followed the PRISMA-DTA guidelines. MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched from inception to May 2025. Eligible studies included paediatric patients (< 21 years) where AI models assessed plain radiographs for fractures, using human readers as the reference standard. Primary outcomes were pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), positive likelihood ratio (LR), and negative likelihood ratio (LR⁻). The risk of bias was assessed using QUADAS-2. Random-effects models and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) curves were applied. RESULTS: Seventeen studies met the inclusion criteria, with 11 contributing to the meta-analysis (over 10,000 radiographs). Pooled sensitivity was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.89-0.94), and specificity was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.85-0.94), corresponding to a false-positive rate of 0.10. The HSROC curve demonstrated high overall discriminative ability. Subgroup analyses showed comparable diagnostic performance for upper extremity fractures (sensitivity 0.91, specificity 0.89) and lower extremity fractures (sensitivity 0.89, specificity 0.94). The pooled DOR was 104.6, LR was 9.32, and LR⁻ was 0.089. Most studies had a low risk of bias, though many were retrospective and single-centre with limited external validation. CONCLUSION: AI models, particularly deep learning architectures, demonstrate high diagnostic accuracy for detecting paediatric appendicular fractures on radiographs, approaching expert-level performance and improving the diagnostic abilities of junior clinicians. However, broader clinical adoption requires robust external validation and prospective integration into clinical workflows. KEY POINTS: Question What is the diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence models for detecting paediatric appendicular fractures on plain radiographs? Findings AI models showed high diagnostic accuracy for paediatric appendicular fractures, with a pooled sensitivity of 0.92, specificity of 0.90, strong HSROC performance, and consistent results across limb subgroups. Clinical relevance AI-assisted fracture detection may improve diagnostic accuracy, support junior clinicians, and reduce delays in identifying paediatric appendicular fractures, enhancing patient safety and enabling faster, more efficient care pathways in emergency and outpatient settings.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.