Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

tDCS improves core symptoms and social communication in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorders

tDCS improves core symptoms and social communication in children and adolescents with autism…
Photo by Jerry Wang / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider tDCS as a potential intervention to improve social communication and core behavioral symptoms in children with ASD.

This meta-analysis of randomized sham-controlled trials evaluated the efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) compared to sham controls for children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). The analysis included 278 participants across multiple studies.

The synthesis revealed that tDCS led to significant improvements in overall behavioral symptoms (SMD = -0.50, p < 0.01), social function (SMD = -0.40, p = 0.02), and communication (SMD = -0.34, p = 0.04). Conversely, no significant difference was found between tDCS and sham controls for symptoms of restricted and repetitive behaviors (p = 0.06). A subgroup analysis indicated that children-only cohorts showed greater improvement (SMD = -0.70) compared to groups including adolescents (SMD = -0.06, p = 0.03).

Treatment acceptability was reported as fair, and no significant differences in discontinuation rates were noted between the tDCS and sham groups. While results suggest tDCS may support improvements in socio-communication symptoms for children and adolescents with ASD, further research is needed to address specific limitations not detailed in this analysis.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
Sample sizen = 278
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedJun 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed at investigating the effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in improving autism spectrum disorder (ASD)-related behavioral symptoms in children and adolescents. METHODS: Randomized placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) recruiting children/adolescents were identified from major databases using the keywords "tDCS" and "ASD". Outcomes included improvement in ASD-related overall/core symptoms and treatment acceptability. Effect sizes of continuous and categorical data were expressed as standardized mean difference (SMD) and odds ratios (ORs), respectively, with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Meta-analysis of nine RCTs (278 participants, mean age = 8.1) showed improvement in overall behavioral symptoms, social function, and communication in the tDCS group compared with sham-controls [SMD = -0.50, p < 0.01; SMD = -0.40, p = 0.02 (seven studies) and SMD = -0.34, p = 0.04 (six studies), respectively] without difference in symptoms of restricted and repetitive behaviors (SMD = -0.36, p = 0.06). Subgroup analysis revealed greater improvement in studies enrolling only children than those that also recruited adolescents (SMD = -0.70 vs. -0.06, respectively, p = 0.03). No difference was noted in treatment acceptability (i.e., the number of participants withdrawing from a study) between the tDCS and sham-controlled groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our study supported tDCS use for improving overall behavioral symptoms of ASD in children and adolescents, mainly those pertinent to socio-communication, with fair treatment acceptability.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.