Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Systematic review finds TF-CBT most supported for trauma in children under 12Review compares 12 therapies for trauma symptoms in young children

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider TF-CBT as most supported for trauma in young children, but note evidence strength varies.

This systematic review and partial meta-analyses examined evidence for 12 psychological treatments for trauma-related symptomatology in trauma-exposed children ≤12 years. The review included 127 studies with a total of 5689 children, though specific study designs, comparators, and follow-up periods were not reported. The analysis found that Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (TF-CBT) is currently the most empirically supported intervention for this population.

Partial meta-analyses for specific treatments showed varying effect sizes: Sandplay demonstrated a large effect size, TF-CBT showed a moderate-to-large effect size, while Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR), play therapy, and Child-Parent Psychotherapy (CPP) all showed small-to-moderate effect sizes. No absolute numbers, p-values, or confidence intervals were reported for these effect estimates. For five other treatments (KIDNET, Neuro-Affective Relational Model, Somatic Experiencing®, Sleeping Dogs Method, and Compassion-Focused Therapy), no evidence was available.

Safety and tolerability data were not reported. Key limitations include considerable variation in methodological quality across the included studies and methodological limitations embedded in the literature reviewed. The evidence represents associations from quantitative studies with pre-post designs rather than establishing causality. In practice, while TF-CBT appears most supported based on available evidence, clinicians should note the evidence strength varied and findings are based on partial meta-analyses only for some treatments.

Researchers conducted a large review to understand which psychological therapies might help young children who have experienced trauma. They analyzed data from 127 different studies involving over 5,600 children aged 12 and under. The review looked at 12 different treatment approaches, including Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (TF-CBT), Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR), and various forms of play therapy.

The main finding was that TF-CBT is currently the most researched and empirically supported therapy for reducing trauma-related symptoms in this age group. For some other therapies, like Sandplay, the analysis suggested a large positive effect, while EMDR, Child-Parent Psychotherapy, and play therapy showed small-to-moderate positive effects. It is important to note that these results came from a partial analysis and the strength of the evidence varied.

Readers should be cautious for a few key reasons. The quality of the original studies was mixed, which affects confidence in the results. For five of the treatments listed, the reviewers found no evidence to analyze at all. This means we don't know if those therapies work for young children. The review shows which therapies have been studied the most, but it does not prove that one treatment causes better outcomes than another for every child.

What this means for you:
TF-CBT is the most studied therapy for young children with trauma; other options show promise but have less evidence.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
INTRODUCTION: Treatment effects among trauma-exposed child populations (≤12 years) are understudied. Practicians must therefore rely on their own clinical experience and evidence from older children when deciding on interventions for young, traumatized children. The present study aimed to review the evidence for 12 psychological treatments employed with trauma-exposed child populations. METHODS: Systematic literature searches for quantitative studies with pre-post designs were conducted separately for each method across six databases. Results were narratively synthesized and assessed on strength of evidence and methodological quality. For TF-CBT, EMDR, play therapy, CPP, and Sandplay, supplementary three-level meta-analyses of controlled studies were conducted. RESULTS: A total of 127 studies involving N = 5689 children were included in the narrative synthesis with most studies concerning TF-CBT. Study methodological quality varied considerably. For five of the assessed treatments (KIDNET, the Neuro-Affective Relational Model, Somatic Experiencing®, the Sleeping Dogs Method, and Compassion-Focused Therapy), no evidence was available. The partial meta-analyses revealed a large effect size for Sandplay (k = 3), moderate-to-large effect for TF-CBT (k = 24) and small-to-moderate effects for EMDR (k = 6), play therapy (k = 10), and CPP (k = 5). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: TF-CBT is currently the most empirically supported intervention for treating trauma-related symptoms among children ≤12 years. Findings are discussed in light of methodological limitations embedded in the literature reviewed and in relation to current international treatment guidelines for PTSD in children and youth. Future research should focus on studying treatments with meager or no evidence, developmentally sensitive method refinements and more diverse samples e.g., younger ages, cultural background, trauma type(s), and associated symptomatology.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.