Home›Pediatrics› Children with cochlear implants report lower quality of life in social and school domains
Children with cochlear implants report lower quality of life in social and school domainsCochlear Implants Linked to Lower Social and School Quality of Life
Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHRPublished August 11, 2026Study authors: Alharbi Ghaida E, Alabdali Rozan M, Bukhari Lujain A, Nughays Reem O, Almazroy Enar A, Elyas Shahad …PubMed ↗DOI ↗Editorial oversight: Dr. Sofia Müller, MD · Lifespan & Whole-Person Care
AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review.
How we work
Share
Key Takeaway
Consider assessing social and school functioning in children with cochlear implants, as QoL may be lower despite implantation.
This meta-analysis synthesized evidence on quality of life (QoL) in children with cochlear implants (CIs) from both children's and parents' perspectives. The analysis included 1194 children with CIs and compared their QoL with that of children using hearing aids and children with normal hearing (NH). The primary outcome was QoL, with a secondary focus on comparing QoL across these three groups.
The key finding was that children with CIs had significantly lower QoL in the social and school functioning domains compared to their peers with NH. However, the analysis revealed high heterogeneity among studies, and some children with CIs showed QoL comparable to children with NH. This variability suggests that the impact of cochlear implantation on QoL is not uniform and may depend on individual and contextual factors.
The authors noted high heterogeneity among studies as a major limitation, which complicates the interpretation of pooled results. Additionally, the meta-analysis did not report effect sizes, confidence intervals, or p-values, so the magnitude of the differences remains unclear. The association between cochlear implants and lower QoL in specific domains is noted, but causality cannot be inferred from this design.
For clinical practice, these findings highlight the challenges in social integration and academic performance for children with CIs. The authors suggest a need for long-term follow-up and personalized interventions to address these QoL domains. Clinicians should consider these results when counseling families and planning supportive care for children with cochlear implants.
How this fits prior evidence
This meta-analysis extends prior coverage on hearing loss in children by focusing on quality of life outcomes. It aligns with earlier findings that children with hearing loss face physical challenges, such as lower strength and agility, by showing that social and school functioning are also affected. The result that some children with CIs achieve QoL comparable to normal-hearing peers contrasts with the overall lower QoL, echoing the variability seen in other reviews, such as the one on hearing aid use and cognition. It also addresses a gap by providing pooled data on QoL, complementing prior reviews that focused on physical fitness or auditory mechanisms.
A large review of data from 1,194 children looked at the quality of life for those using cochlear implants. The study compared these children to peers who used hearing aids and those with normal hearing. The researchers specifically looked at how these children performed in school and social settings.
The findings showed that children with cochlear implants often reported lower quality of life in social and school domains than their peers with normal hearing. However, the results were mixed across different studies. Some children with cochlear implants did show a quality of life similar to those with normal hearing.
Because there was high variation between the studies, it is hard to say exactly how much impact the device has on every child. These findings highlight that social integration and school performance are areas where these children may need extra support. Because results vary, personalized care and long-term follow-up are important for each child.
What this means for you:
Children with cochlear implants may face specific challenges in school and social life compared to peers with normal hearing.
Common questions
How does a cochlear implant affect a child's social life?
The study found that children with cochlear implants often reported lower quality of life specifically in social functioning domains when compared to peers with normal hearing. Because results varied across different studies, the impact can differ for each child.
Do children with cochlear implants struggle more in school?
The data showed that quality of life in school functioning was significantly lower for children with cochlear implants compared to peers with normal hearing. This suggests that academic performance and integration may be areas requiring extra attention.
Are the results for all children with cochlear implants the same?
No, the study showed high variation among different cases. While many children with cochlear implants had lower scores in social and school domains, some children with these implants showed a quality of life comparable to those with normal hearing.
PURPOSE: The primary objective of this study was to assess the quality of life (QoL) in children with cochlear implants (CIs) from the children's and parents' perspectives through utilizing the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) and KINDL questionnaires. A secondary objective was to compare the QoL of children with CIs to those using hearing aids and to children with normal hearing (NH).
METHOD: A total of 1,830 records were obtained since the search was systematically carried out across databases, which are PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Ovid Embase. Following screening, 10 studies met the eligibility criteria, with 1,194 participants. This systematic review and meta-analysis were International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews registered and followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. It included research published in English that evaluated QoL using the PedsQL and KINDL questionnaires. The Appraisal Tool for Cross-Sectional Studies tool evaluated the risk of bias in the included studies. Data extraction focused on study characteristics, participant demographics, and QoL outcomes. Descriptive analysis and meta-analysis were used to synthesize the data.
RESULTS: QoL was significantly lower in children with CIs when compared to peers with NH, according to the meta-analysis, specifically in the social and school functioning domains. Descriptive analysis revealed high heterogeneity among studies, with some children with CIs showing QoL comparable to children with NH.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the advantages of CIs, challenges remain high, specifically in social integration and academic performance. These findings are indicative of the necessity for long-term follow-up and personalized intervention to maximize the global QoL in children with CIs.
