Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Individuals with autism spectrum disorder exhibit significantly poorer olfactory performance compared to non-autistic peersPeople with autism show lower performance in smelling and tasting

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that individuals with autism show significantly poorer olfactory performance, especially in informant-reported measures.

This meta-analysis evaluates olfactory performance in individuals with autism spectrum disorder compared to non-autistic individuals. The study synthesized data from 1,580 autistic individuals and 7,698 non-autistic individuals to assess various dimensions of olfactory and taste-smell function.

Key findings indicate significantly poorer overall olfactory performance in autistic individuals (effect size -0.64). Specific deficits were noted in psychophysical testing (effect size -0.58), odor identification (effect size -0.66), and threshold (effect size -0.47). Notably, informant reports showed a much larger effect size of -1.31, and taste-smell measures from informant reports showed an effect size of -1.33. In contrast, self-report or odor rating measures showed no significant difference. Among children with autism, moderate deficits were observed in overall performance (effect size -0.88), odor identification (effect size -0.80), and threshold (effect size -0.65).

The authors note several limitations, including heterogeneity in testing methods, small sample sizes in primary studies, and a lack of consistent demographic accounting. Clinical relevance is centered on the need for age-appropriate, standardized measures to evaluate sensory function across the lifespan. Results vary by assessment method, and no specific clinical recommendations are provided.

How this fits prior evidence

This meta-analysis addresses a gap in understanding sensory processing in autism. While previous evidence has established the role of genetic architecture in autism and the efficacy of interventions like tDCS for social cognition or exercise for executive function, this finding specifically characterizes olfactory deficits. It confirms that sensory impairments are a measurable component of the autism spectrum, though the magnitude of these deficits depends heavily on the specific measurement tool used.

Senses like smell and taste are often overlooked, but they play a huge role in how we experience the world. A large review of existing research found that people with autism often have significantly poorer olfactory performance. This means they may have a harder time identifying specific scents or detecting subtle changes in odors compared to people without autism.

The study looked at 1,580 people with autism and 7,698 people without. While some tests showed no difference in how people rated smells personally, other tests showed clear gaps. Specifically, reports from others and certain taste-smell measures showed much lower performance for those with autism. Children with autism also showed moderate deficits in identifying smells and reaching scent thresholds.

It is important to note that these findings come from a collection of different studies, which had some limitations. Some studies were small, and the methods used to test smell varied. Because of these differences, the results can vary depending on exactly how a person is being tested. These findings highlight the need for better, standardized ways to check how sensory functions work across all ages.

What this means for you:
People with autism often show significant differences in how they identify and process smells and tastes.

Common questions

How much does smell differ for people with autism?

The study found that individuals with autism have significantly poorer overall olfactory performance. Specifically, they showed worse results in identifying odors and reaching scent thresholds. Children with autism also showed moderate deficits in these areas, including identifying smells and reaching thresholds.

Are there differences in how taste and smell are reported?

While some self-report or odor rating measures showed no significant difference, other measures told a different story. Informant reports and specific taste-smell measures showed significant differences, with individuals with autism performing worse in those categories.

Is the evidence for these findings certain?

The results vary based on the specific method used to test olfactory function. Because the original studies used different testing methods and some had small sample sizes, the results are not uniform across all types of smell and taste tests.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedSep 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Altered sensory processing is recognized as a core diagnostic feature of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Olfactory perception in autism remains poorly characterized, despite its important role in safety, nutrition, and socialization. We conducted a preregistered systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify differences and identify moderators in olfactory function between autistic and non-autistic individuals. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we searched Web of Science, SCOPUS, PubMed, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases and identified 46 eligible studies with 87 effect sizes from 1,580 autistic and 7,698 non-autistic individuals. Moderator analyses examined olfactory assessment type, olfactory function tested, age, sex, and intelligence quotient (IQ). Autistic individuals showed significantly poorer olfactory performance than non-autistic ( = -0.64), with reduced performance in psychophysical testing ( = -0.58) and informant reports ( = -1.31), but not in self-report or odor rating measures. In autism, significant differences were observed for psychophysically measured odor identification ( = -0.66), threshold ( = -0.47), and taste-smell measures from informant reports ( = -1.33). Autistic children exhibited moderate deficits ( = -0.88; odor identification:  = -0.80; threshold:  = -0.65). Olfactory alterations in autism appear most pronounced in childhood and vary by assessment method and olfactory function measured. Our results highlight the need for age-appropriate standardized measures to accurately evaluate sensory function in autism across the lifespan.Lay AbstractMany autistic individuals experience sensory sensitivities that can make everyday activities more difficult. While researchers have studied how autism affects senses like sight and sound, the sense of smell has received much less attention, even though it plays important roles in helping us detect danger, judge whether food is safe to eat, and connect with others socially. Past studies have suggested that autistic individuals may experience differences in their sense of smell, including how well they can detect, distinguish, or identify odors by name. However, the results of smell studies in autism have been mixed because studies often use different testing methods, have small numbers of participants, and do not always account for demographic factors (e.g., age or sex). In this study, we reviewed the published research literature to better understand how the sense of smell differs based on: (1) whether someone is autistic or not, (2) the type of smell test used, (3) age (children vs. adults), and (4) the specific smell ability being measured. Overall, we found that autistic individuals tend to have poorer smell abilities than non-autistic individuals. These differences between autistic and non-autistic individuals were most noticeable when smell was measured by caregiver reports or standardized laboratory tests, but not when people rated their own sense of smell or described how odors smelled to them. These differences in smell were mainly seen in autistic children. The strongest differences were found in odor identification, sensitivity to smells, and caregiver-reported taste and smell experiences.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.