Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Early LAIV administration leads to 2.5-times increased odds of pneumococcal density at 14 daysFlu vaccine may increase bacteria levels in children and families

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that early LAIV may increase pneumococcal density and contact acquisition at 14 days post-vaccination.

This randomized controlled trial was conducted across 10 sites in the United Kingdom to evaluate the impact of live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) on Streptococcus pneumoniae dynamics in children and their household contacts. The study enrolled 405 families, totaling 1379 participants. The study population specifically focused on children aged 2 years as index cases and their associated household contacts to monitor bacterial density and transmission patterns following influenza vaccination.

The study utilized a comparative design between an early LAIV group (vaccination at visit 1) and a late LAIV group (vaccination at visit 3). Participants were monitored over 5 visits, scheduled at 2-week intervals. The primary objective was to measure S. pneumoniae density in index children at 14 and 28 days post-vaccination, alongside the prevalence of S. pneumoniae colonization in household contacts at the same intervals.

Regarding the primary outcomes, the study found that children in the early LAIV group had a 2.5-times increase in the odds of having increased pneumococcal density at 14 days (95% CI 1.5-4.3, p=0.0008). Furthermore, the odds of household contacts acquiring S. pneumoniae at 14 days were 2.0-times higher in the early LAIV group (95% CI 1.2-3.5, p=0.015). At the 28-day mark, the results were less definitive. The odds of vaccinated children having increased pneumococcal density at 28 days showed a 1.5-times increase, but this was not statistically significant (95% CI 0.88-2.5, p=0.14). Similarly, the odds of household contacts acquiring S. pneumoniae at 28 days were 0.89 times, which did not show a significant change (95% CI 0.53-1.5, p=0.67).

Safety and tolerability data were limited in the report. No specific adverse events were detailed in the primary results, although 3 serious adverse events related to pregnancy and breastfeeding were reported; however, these were deemed unrelated to the study. No data regarding specific discontinuation rates or general tolerability metrics were provided.

These findings provide specific insights into the interaction between attenuated influenza viruses and pneumococcal carriage. While the study does not directly compare against historical benchmarks, it highlights a specific temporal window where vaccine-induced changes in bacterial density may influence transmission. The results suggest that the increase in pneumococcal acquisition by contacts is likely driven by the vaccine-induced rise in bacterial density.

Methodological limitations include the lack of reported data on specific adverse events and the lack of statistical significance at the 28-day follow-up point. These results suggest that the impact of LAIV on pneumococcal density and subsequent transmission may be most pronounced in the immediate 14-day window following administration. Clinical implications suggest that in children colonized with S. pneumoniae, the timing of influenza vaccination may influence the risk of pneumococcal acquisition among close contacts. Questions remain regarding the long-term implications of these density changes and the specific mechanisms driving the 14-day spike in transmission.

Funding for the study was provided by the University of Bristol, Gates Foundation, Pfizer, and the European Society of Paediatric Infectious Diseases.

How this fits prior evidence

How this fits prior evidence: This study addresses a gap in understanding the interaction between influenza vaccines and pneumococcal carriage. While previous evidence has established higher post-pandemic vaccine effectiveness against A(H3N2) and B strains, this study specifically examines the secondary impact of live attenuated influenza vaccines on S. pneumoniae density and household transmission. It does not relate to the findings regarding influenza vaccination rates in Chinese healthcare workers, the efficacy of Bangga extracts, or the impact of opt-out nudges on medical resident vaccination.

When a child gets a flu shot, the goal is to protect them from getting sick. However, some vaccines can cause unexpected reactions in the body. This study looked at how a specific type of flu vaccine, known as a live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV), affects the amount of a common bacteria called Streptococcus pneumoniae in children and the people they live with. This bacteria is important because it can cause serious infections in young children.

Researchers conducted a trial in the UK involving 405 families. They followed 1,379 people across 10 different sites. The study compared children who received the flu vaccine early versus those who received it later. The goal was to see if the vaccine caused a change in the amount of bacteria living in the children's noses or throats, and if that change affected their household contacts.

The results showed a notable change shortly after the vaccination. At the 14-day mark, children who received the vaccine were 2.5 times more likely to have an increased amount of the bacteria. Furthermore, the people living in those children's homes were 2.0 times more likely to pick up the bacteria at that same 14-day point. This suggests that the vaccine might cause a temporary rise in bacterial density, making it easier for the bacteria to spread to others nearby. By the 28-day mark, these numbers leveled off, and the differences were no longer statistically significant.

Safety was monitored throughout the study. While there were some serious events reported, they were related to pregnancy and breastfeeding and were not linked to the vaccine itself. However, the study does have some limitations. The increase in bacteria was only significant at the two-week mark, not at the four-week mark. This means the effect might be a temporary spike rather than a long-term change.

For parents and doctors, this means that while the vaccine is designed to prevent the flu, it can cause a brief window where bacteria levels rise. This finding helps experts understand how vaccines interact with the environment around a child. It does not mean the vaccine is unsafe, but it does highlight a specific biological reaction that happens in the weeks following the shot. It is a piece of the puzzle in understanding how to best protect children from both the flu and related bacterial infections.

What this means for you:
A flu vaccine can cause a temporary spike in bacteria levels in children, potentially increasing risk to family members.

Study Details

Study typeRct
Sample sizen = 703
EvidenceLevel 2
Follow-up24.0 mo
PublishedOct 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: The live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) is offered in the UK to young children, protecting against influenza for those vaccinated, and as an indirect protection for the wider community. LAIV has also been shown to increase carriage density of Streptococcus pneumoniae, to an extent, in children. This study sought to confirm whether the vaccine, as a viral proxy, leads to an increase in carriage density in children and, if so, whether this increase augments S pneumoniae acquisition in household contacts. METHODS: We conducted a randomised control study (ISRCTN10720581, now complete) across ten UK sites. We included families having a child aged 2 years (index child) and due to receive their first LAIV dose under National Health Service criteria, and at least two other household contacts. Participants were excluded when the index child was ineligible for LAIV, had primary or secondary immunodeficiency, or was currently enrolled in other trials or circumstances that could jeopardise participation or data integrity during the study. Families were randomly assigned (1:1) to either the early LAIV group or late LAIV group using a single central allocation service with computerised randomisation for all sites. After randomisation, families and clinical research staff were unmasked; however, laboratory and analytical research staff remained masked. Nasopharyngeal swabs were collected from all participants over five visits, each 2 weeks apart, and tested for pneumococcal carriage by quantitative PCR for lytA, with a cycle threshold (Ct) cutoff of 35, and Ct values converted to gene copies per mL. LAIV was given to index children at visit 1 in the early LAIV group and at visit 3 in the late LAIV group. The coprimary outcomes of this study were S pneumoniae density in index children at 14 and 28 days after LAIV as compared with that on day 0, and the prevalence, at days 14 and 28, of S pneumoniae colonisation in the household contacts of index children who were S pneumoniae-positive at baseline. We developed regression models to analyse the association between vaccination and whether an increase in pneumococcal density was observed 14 and 28 days later, in addition to an increase in the odds of S pneumoniae acquisition in household members after administering LAIV. Serious adverse events were recorded if reported to the study team and were assessed by the Chief Investigator for seriousness, expectedness, and relatedness to LAIV or study procedures. FINDINGS: 405 families were enrolled between Oct 3, and Oct 30, 2017, and between Sept 27, and Nov 2, 2018. 205 families (703 participants) were allocated to the early LAIV group and 200 (676 participants) to the late LAIV group. Data on sex were available for 402 of 405 index participants. In the early LAIV group, 116 (58%) of 202 index children were female and 86 (42%) were male, and the median age was 2·47 years (IQR 0·331); in the late LAIV group, 91 (46%) of 200 index children were female and 108 (54%) were male, and the median age was 2·47 years (0·333). In the early LAIV group, 276 (59%) of 470 household contacts were female and 194 (41%) were male, and the median age of contacts was 33·8 (IQR 31·7); in the late LAIV group 272 (60%) of 453 household contacts were female and 181 (40%) were male, and the median age of contacts was 33·1 (IQR 31·4). 388 (96%) of 405 households, including 1309 (95%) of the 1379 participants, completed the study. Regression analyses showed that there was a 2·5-times (95% CI 1·5-4·3, p=0·0008) increase in the odds of vaccinated children having increased pneumococcal density 14 days later, compared with that in unvaccinated children, and a 2·0-times (95% CI 1·2-3·5, p=0·015) increase in the odds of household contacts S pneumoniae acquisition. These effects appear to have attenuated by day 28, on which there was a 1·5 times (95% CI 0·88-2·5, p=0·14) increase in odds of vaccinated children having increased pneumococcal density compared with that in unvaccinated children and a 0·89 times (95% CI 0·53-1·5, p=0·67) the odds of household contacts S pneumoniae acquisition. Three serious adverse events related to pregnancy and breastfeeding were reported, which were deemed to be unrelated to the study. INTERPRETATION: Our results show that in young children colonised with S pneumoniae, infection with an attenuated influenza virus in the 2 weeks after vaccination increases the risk of pneumococcal acquisition among their close contacts. This effect appears to be driven by a vaccine-induced rise in bacterial density. On the basis of our results, density of bacterial nasal colonisation in young children could be used to model transmission dynamics, both at the individual and population levels. FUNDING: University of Bristol, Gates Foundation, Pfizer, European Society of Paediatric Infectious Diseases.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.