This randomized controlled trial included 1368 trial participants with tuberculosis infection across Indonesia, Canada, and Vietnam. The setting included Indonesia, Canada, and Vietnam. The population consisted of adults and adolescents aged ≥ 10 years. A subset of 440 included in model development was used for analysis.
The intervention involved high-dose rifampicin at 20 mg/kg/day (2R20) or 30 mg/kg/day (2R30) for 2 months. The comparator was standard-dose rifampicin at 10 mg/kg/day (4R10) for 4 months. The primary outcome was to characterize population pharmacokinetics of rifampicin.
Bioavailability was lower in Canada and Vietnam compared with Indonesia. Canada results showed -21.8% (95% CI -27.9 to -18.0%). Vietnam results showed -12.3% (95% CI -17.7 to -7.9%). The 24-hour area under the concentration-time curve increased more than proportionally with dose. Levels were higher across treatment arms in Indonesia, followed by Vietnam and Canada.
Safety data regarding adverse events, serious adverse events, and discontinuations were not reported. Tolerability was not reported. Limitations included unmeasured confounders. Follow-up duration was 2.0 months.
Practice relevance was not reported. Association versus causation was not explicitly distinguished. Funding or conflicts were not reported.
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: High-dose rifampicin could potentially shorten tuberculosis preventive therapy (TPT) and improve outcomes. We aimed to characterize population pharmacokinetics of standard- and high-dose rifampicin for TPT among individuals with tuberculosis infection.
METHODS: Intensive and sparse pharmacokinetic substudies were conducted in Indonesia, Canada, and Vietnam within the 2R2 randomized trial, which compared 2 months of high-dose rifampicin at 20 mg/kg/day (2R20) or 30 mg/kg/day (2R30) with 4 months of standard-dose rifampicin at 10 mg/kg/day (4R10) in adults and adolescents aged ≥ 10 years. Venous blood samples were collected after 4 weeks of treatment. Rifampicin pharmacokinetics were analyzed using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling in NONMEM.
RESULTS: Among 1368 trial participants, 440 were included in model development (51 intensive and 389 sparse sampling), with 191 (43%) assigned to 4R10, 159 (36%) to 2R20, and 90 (20%) to 2R30. A 1-compartment model with saturable hepatic extraction and transit-compartment absorption best described rifampicin pharmacokinetics. All disposition parameters were allometrically scaled using fat-free mass. Country-specific differences, particularly variation in drug formulation, were associated with lower bioavailability in Canada {-21.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] -27.9 to -18.0%)} and Vietnam (-12.3% [95% CI -17.7 to -7.9%]) compared with Indonesia. The 24-hour area under the concentration-time curve increased more than proportionally with dose and was higher across treatment arms in Indonesia, followed by Vietnam and Canada.
CONCLUSIONS: High-dose rifampicin for TPT resulted in greater-than-proportional increases in exposure due to nonlinear clearance at higher doses. Substantial between-country variability in exposure was observed, which may have been due to multiple factors, including differences in country-specific formulations, fat-free mass, and unmeasured confounders.