A systematic review examined 47 studies from around the world to understand how climate change affects outdoor activities. The research looked at factors like rising temperatures, extreme weather events, changes in precipitation, snow conditions, and environmental degradation. These factors create an asymmetric bidirectional relationship with outdoor activity opportunities. The review also explored how outdoor activities themselves impact the climate through emissions and ecological pressures. These pressures mainly come from transportation, tourism consumption, facility operation, artificial snowmaking, energy use, and resource consumption. Evidence for this feedback remains comparatively limited but suggests a non-negligible role. The studies involved participants in various outdoor activities globally. No specific safety concerns or adverse events were reported in this review of non-clinical environmental studies. Readers should understand that future research needs to distinguish between climate suitability and actual participation. Strengthening integrated assessments of carbon emissions, adaptation, risk governance, and low-carbon transition pathways is recommended for the future.
Climate change alters outdoor activity suitability and creates asymmetric bidirectional environmental impacts across 47 studiesClimate change alters outdoor activity opportunities and safety risks globally
AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work
This systematic review synthesizes evidence from 47 studies examining the impact of climate change on outdoor activities. The scope covers global settings and includes secondary outcomes such as recreation demand, site availability, and ecological pressures. The review highlights that climate change affects outdoor activities through rising temperatures, extreme weather, altered precipitation and snow conditions, and environmental degradation. Evidence indicates an asymmetric bidirectional relationship between these factors.
Feedback evidence remains comparatively limited and mainly concerns emissions and ecological pressures associated with transportation, tourism consumption, facility operation, artificial snowmaking, energy use, and resource consumption. These factors play a secondary but non-negligible role in the overall system. The review notes that feedback evidence remains comparatively limited as a key constraint on current understanding.
The authors recommend that future research should distinguish climate suitability from actual participation. They also suggest strengthening integrated assessments of carbon emissions, adaptation, risk governance, and low-carbon transition pathways in outdoor activities. This practice relevance applies to stakeholders managing outdoor recreation and environmental sustainability.