Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

mHealth app-supported care pathway did not significantly reduce caregiver state anxiety in ENT surgery casesMobile app support shows mixed results for anxious surgery caregivers

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that mHealth app-supported care did not significantly reduce caregiver anxiety compared to standard care.

This randomized controlled trial enrolled 227 caregivers of children undergoing ENT surgery, including tonsillectomy, adenoidectomy, and tympanostomy tube insertion. The study compared an mHealth app-supported care pathway, co-designed through a user-centered participatory approach, against standard supportive and educational care alone.

The primary outcome was caregiver state anxiety measured by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-Y). The study reported no statistically significant difference between the mHealth group and the control group (p >.05). Similarly, no statistically significant difference was found for the secondary outcome of child distress (p >.05).

Correlation analyses revealed that higher baseline anxiety was linked to lower app use (rho = -0.22; 95% CI -0.39 to -0.04; p=0.02). Additionally, greater app use was linked to lower child distress (rho = -0.23; 95% CI -0.40 to -0.04; p=0.02).

Limitations included limited exposure to the intervention, specific outcome selection and timing, and external factors such as independent information-seeking by caregivers. Safety and tolerability data were not reported. These findings suggest that while app usage correlates with certain outcomes, the intervention did not significantly outperform standard care in this trial. Future implementation may require identifying specific caregiver subgroups most likely to benefit from mHealth tools.

Parents often face intense stress when their children need surgery for issues like tonsillectomies or ear tube insertions. To help, researchers tested a mobile app designed to guide caregivers through the preparation process. They compared this app-supported path against standard educational care to see if it could lower anxiety for the parents and distress for the children.

The study included 227 caregivers in a hospital setting. While the results showed no significant difference in overall anxiety levels between the two groups, some specific patterns emerged. For example, children who were part of the group using the app showed lower distress levels when the app was used more frequently. However, the study also found that parents who started with very high anxiety were less likely to use the app.

Because the study had limited exposure to the app and didn't account for how much outside information parents sought, the results are not definitive. The findings suggest that while the app didn't change the overall outcome for everyone, it might help specific groups. Doctors may need to look closer at how to best implement these tools for the families who need them most.

What this means for you:
A mobile app did not significantly lower overall anxiety, but more use was linked to lower distress in children.

Common questions

Did the mobile app reduce anxiety for parents?

The study did not find a statistically significant difference in state anxiety between the group using the mobile app and the group receiving standard care. This means the app did not significantly lower overall anxiety levels for the 227 caregivers involved in the trial.

Did the app help reduce distress for the children?

While there was no significant difference in overall child distress between the two groups, the data showed that greater use of the app was linked to lower child distress (rho = -0.23). This suggests a link between more frequent use and calmer children.

Who might benefit most from this type of app?

The study found that caregivers with higher baseline anxiety were actually less likely to use the app. Because of this, researchers suggest focusing on how to reach specific caregivers who might benefit most from mobile-supported education.

Study Details

Study typeRct
Sample sizen = 87
EvidenceLevel 2
PublishedSep 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: Pediatric ear, nose, and throat (ENT) surgery is common, but generates perioperative anxiety for caregivers and distress in children. Limited time for perioperative education and reliance on unverified online information can reduce family preparedness and increase stress. Few studies have evaluated co-designed mobile health (mHealth) apps to support and engage families in the perioperative ENT journey. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare caregiver anxiety between an mHealth app-supported care pathway and standard supportive and educational care alone in the perioperative ENT context. Secondary objectives explored between-group differences in caregiver anxiety at follow-up, family preparation, child distress, and social-impact indicators. METHODS: A 2-arm, parallel-group, open-label randomized controlled trial (RCT) enrolled caregivers of children undergoing ENT surgery (tonsillectomy, adenoidectomy, tympanostomy tube insertion). The intervention was an mHealth app co-designed through a user-centered participatory approach and developed following Schnall and colleagues' Information Systems Research Framework, with content based on caregivers' informational needs. RCT participants were recruited at the hospital during their presurgery visit, when a health care provider introduced the study and provided instructions on how to use the app. No additional human support was scheduled thereafter. A sample size of 180 participants (90 per group) was estimated to detect the expected between-group difference in caregiver anxiety. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to app use or standard care alone. The primary outcome was the between-group difference in caregiver state anxiety (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory [STAI-Y]). Secondary outcomes included between-group differences in child distress (modified version of the Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale [mYPAS]), child preparation for surgery, family preparation for hospital admission and surgery, and social impact indicators. Outcomes were assessed online through questionnaires, which included both self-reported measures and evaluations completed by a nurse on the day of surgery. App engagement metrics were also collected. Reporting followed the CONSORT-EHEALTH (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials of Electronic and Mobile Health Applications and Online Telehealth) guidelines. RESULTS: The study enrolled 227 caregivers, with 111 allocated to the control group (CG) and 116 to the experimental group (EG), achieving the target sample size. No statistically significant differences were observed between the groups for the primary or secondary outcomes (all >.05). In the EG, 75% (n=87) of the participants accessed at least 1 item of in-app content. Higher baseline anxiety was linked to lower app use (ρ=-0.22, 95% CI -0.39 to -0.04; =.02), while greater use was linked to lower child distress (ρ=-0.23, 95% CI -0.40 to -0.04; =.02). CONCLUSIONS: Although the hypotheses were not confirmed, these findings provide valuable insights for future perioperative mHealth research. The lack of effectiveness may reflect limited exposure to the intervention, outcome selection and timing, and contextual factors such as caregivers' independent information-seeking. These findings support a greater focus on implementation processes and on identifying the caregivers most likely to benefit from mHealth-supported education.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.