Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Abundant research exists on sex and gender effects in obsessive-compulsive disorder despite limited evidence synthesisSex and Gender Differences in OCD: A Scoping Review

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that while research on sex and gender in OCD is abundant, evidence synthesis remains limited and inconsistent.

This scoping review synthesized 1,038 included studies, including 72 meta-analyses, 19 systematic reviews, and 897 original reports, to map the landscape of sex and gender differences in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). The review identifies an abundant volume of research regarding sex and gender effects in OCD, yet highlights a limited synthesis of this evidence for clinical application.

The authors note several significant limitations in the current body of evidence, including inconsistent assessments of sex and gender, variability in OCD symptom measurement, and a failure to account for menstrual cycle effects. Additionally, the review notes a lack of genome-wide and full-brain imaging studies, as well as potential biases from not accounting for gender differences in insight, help-seeking behaviors, and comorbidity.

While the review does not provide definitive clinical guidelines, it suggests that investigating these differences can advance equitable mental health care. By addressing the specific needs of diverse populations, clinicians may eventually develop more targeted interventions. However, the current evidence is characterized by high variability and incomplete synthesis.

How this fits prior evidence

This scoping review addresses a gap in the current evidence regarding the specific nuances of obsessive-compulsive disorder. While previous evidence confirmed that acupoint stimulation reduces OCD symptoms by 3.14 points on Y-BOCS, this review highlights that the broader understanding of how sex and gender influence OCD symptomology and treatment remains poorly synthesized. It does not directly relate to the findings on intolerance of uncertainty, sertraline monitoring, or ASD phenotypes.

A scoping review examined over 1,000 studies on sex and gender differences in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). The review found that while there is a large amount of research on this topic, the findings have not been well integrated. This means that clear conclusions about how OCD affects males and females differently are still lacking.

The review included 72 meta-analyses, 19 systematic reviews, and many other studies. It looked at areas like symptoms, how common OCD is, genetics, brain function, treatments, and animal models. Despite the large number of studies, the authors noted that there is limited synthesis of the evidence, making it hard to draw firm conclusions.

One major issue is that researchers measure sex and gender inconsistently. They also often fail to account for menstrual cycle effects, which can influence symptoms in women. Additionally, many studies do not consider differences in insight, help-seeking behavior, or other conditions that often occur with OCD.

The review suggests that future research should focus on these gaps. It proposes that better understanding sex and gender differences could lead to more personalized and effective treatments. For example, treatments might be tailored to the specific needs of men and women, improving mental health care for everyone.

However, the review does not provide definitive clinical guidelines. Instead, it highlights areas where more research is needed. The authors emphasize that this is a starting point for future studies, not a final answer.

What this means for you:
More research is needed to understand how OCD affects men and women differently, which could lead to better treatments.

Common questions

Is there a lot of research on how gender affects OCD?

Yes, there is a large amount of research available regarding sex and gender effects in obsessive-compulsive disorder. However, because the studies use different ways to measure symptoms, it is currently difficult to combine all that information into one clear, unified conclusion for patients.

Why is it hard to create specific treatments for different genders?

It is difficult because many studies do not account for specific factors like the menstrual cycle or differences in how people seek help. Because of these inconsistencies in how data is collected, researchers cannot yet provide definitive clinical guidelines for tailored care.

Study Details

Study typeSystematic review
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedSep 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
This scoping review explores sex and gender differences in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) as reported in the literature between 2009 and 2026. A comprehensive PubMed search was conducted without restrictions, using terms related to sex, gender, and OCD. 8,394 articles were screened by two reviewers, with 1,773 assessed at the full-text level. Of these, 1,038 were included: 72 meta-analyses, 19 systematic reviews, 47 narrative reviews, 3 conceptual and integrative reviews, and 897 original reports. Original reports were categorized by focus - symptomology and burden (120), comorbidities (231), epidemiology (255), human genetics (101), altered neurocognitive and neurobiological functioning (74), treatment (86), and animal models (63) - and assessed for quality using CASP checklists. There was abundant research on sex and gender effects in OCD, but limited synthesis. Identified methodological concerns included inconsistent assessments of sex and gender, variability in OCD symptom measurement, failure to account for menstrual cycle effects, and a lack of genome-wide and full-brain imaging studies. Biases in results may arise from not accounting for gender differences in insight, help-seeking behaviors, and comorbidity. We identify critical knowledge gaps and develop hypotheses for future research, incorporating recommendations for precision medicine approaches. Investigating sex and gender differences in OCD can advance equitable mental health care by addressing the specific needs of diverse populations. Appreciating these effects offers a pathway to better understanding the complexity of OCD, fostering targeted interventions and a more nuanced approach to treatment and prevention
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.