This post-trial access study used a multiple-baseline single-case experimental design in 113 participants aged 7–19 years with ASD, ADHD, epilepsy, or TSC and atypical sensory reactivity; 102 completed follow-up and 95 were analyzable. Intervention was bumetanide treatment up to 1.5 mg twice daily over 6 months. Baseline PROMset scores (seven PROMIS item banks) indicated substantial impairment across domains (mean deviation =9.0 T-score points; p<.001). Sensory reactivity (SSP) correlated negatively with baseline impairment (r=-0.40; p<.001).
Individual-level improvement occurred in 24–41% of participants across PROM domains, with a mean across-case Cohen's d=-1. Anxiety improved in 41% and depressive symptoms in 38%. Overall, 83% improved on at least one domain. Group-level analyses of secondary outcomes (SSP, SRS-2, RBS-R, ABC) showed improvement (p<.001). Compared with historic placebo, superiority was noted for RBS-R and SSP.
Adverse events, serious adverse events, discontinuations, and overall tolerability were not reported. The unmasked design limits causal inference. Integrating PROMsets with individualized trials may detect meaningful changes in heterogeneous populations, but controlled, blinded studies are needed to confirm efficacy and safety.
View Original Abstract ↓
Progress in pharmacological treatment development for neurodevelopmental disorders is hindered by a misalignment between targeted mechanisms, outcome measures, and trial designs. This study was initiated as a post-trial access pathway for bumetanide and later expanded with treatment-naive participants. Within this framework, we implemented a parent-cocreated sensory outcome measure set (PROMset) in an unmasked, multiple-baseline single-case experimental design with randomized baseline periods of 2-12 weeks, followed by 6 months of bumetanide treatment (up to 1.5 mg twice daily). Participants (7-19 years) had atypical sensory reactivity and a diagnosis of ASD, ADHD, epilepsy, or TSC. The primary outcome was a PROMset comprising seven PROMIS item banks assessing anxiety, depressive symptoms, sleep disturbance, fatigue, sleep-related impairment, cognitive function, and peer relationships. Secondary outcomes included SSP, SRS-2, RBS-R, and ABC. Of 113 enrolled participants (mean age 13.2 [SD 2.7], 64% male), 102 completed the trial and 95 had analyzable PROMsets. At baseline, PROMset scores showed substantial impairment across domains (mean deviation =9.0 T-score points, p<.001) and correlated with sensory reactivity (SSP; r=-0.40, p<.001). Individual-level analyses showed improvement in 24-41% of participants per PROM domain, most frequently in anxiety and depressive symptoms (41% and 38%; mean across-case Cohen's d=-1). Overall, 83% improved on at least one domain. Group-level analyses showed improvement across all secondary outcomes (p<.001), with superiority over historic placebo for RBS-R and SSP. Integrating PROMsets with individualized trial designs can reveal clinically meaningful changes, supporting a more sensitive and patient-centered framework for treatment evaluation in heterogeneous populations.