Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Staged bilateral MRgFUS thalamotomy for essential tremor shows consistent procedural parameters in small cohort

Staged bilateral MRgFUS thalamotomy for essential tremor shows consistent procedural parameters in s…
Photo by Brett Jordan / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Note consistent procedural parameters but small targeting shift in staged bilateral MRgFUS for ET.

This was a retrospective-prospective, single-centre observational study with a systematic review component, involving 15 consecutive patients with essential tremor undergoing staged bilateral Magnetic Resonance–guided Focused Ultrasound (MRgFUS) thalamotomy. The study compared the first-side intervention (FUS1) to the second-side intervention (FUS2), focusing on imaging-based and procedural characterisation, including stereotactic targeting, sonication parameters, and lesion morphology. Adverse events were recorded up to 6–12 months for some patients, with MRI acquired within 24 hours and at approximately 1 month post-procedure.

Main results showed procedural, anatomical, and sonication-related parameters were comparable between FUS1 and FUS2. However, final stereotactic targeting for FUS2 showed a small but consistent anterior and dorsal shift relative to FUS1. Lesion volumes at 24 hours and 1 month did not differ significantly between sides. Inter-rater agreement for lesion volumetry was excellent across time points (ICC > 0.91). No significant differences were found in lesion volume or inter-side targeting displacement between patients with versus without gait disturbances. In single-patient analyses, those with adverse events persistent 6–12 months after FUS2 showed heterogeneous spatial lesion configurations.

Safety data indicated adverse events after FUS2 were predominantly mild and transient. Gait disturbances were the most common adverse event persisting at 1 month after the second procedure. Key limitations include the study's design as a single-centre observational study with a small sample size of 15 patients. The findings are based on imaging and procedural metrics from one centre and cannot establish causal relationships between lesion characteristics and adverse events. Practice relevance is limited by the observational nature and lack of generalizability beyond this single-centre cohort.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BackgroundMagnetic Resonance–guided Focused Ultrasound (MRgFUS) thalamotomy is an established incisionless treatment for medication-refractory essential tremor (ET). While staged-bilateral MRgFUS thalamotomy has recently gained clinical acceptance, detailed radiological and procedural comparisons between first- and second-side interventions remain limited. This study aimed to provide a comprehensive imaging-based and procedural characterisation of staged bilateral MRgFUS thalamotomy, with a specific focus on stereotactic targeting, sonication parameters, and lesion morphology.Materials and methodsIn this retrospective-prospective, single-centre observational study, consecutive patients with ET undergoing staged bilateral MRgFUS thalamotomy were included. Procedural metrics, stereotactic targeting coordinates, and sonication parameters were compared between FUS1 and FUS2 procedures. MRI analyses were performed using a standardised protocol including morphological pre-treatment 3D T1-weighted imaging and post-treatment 3D T2-weighted imaging acquired within 24 h and at approximately 1 month to document the lesion. Treatment-related lesions were segmented using a semi-automated approach, with volumetric measurements independently obtained by two blinded raters; inter-rater agreement was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded as secondary outcomes. A systematic review of the literature on treatment strategy of staged bilateral MRgFUS thalamotomy was conducted.ResultsFifteen patients underwent staged bilateral MRgFUS thalamotomy. Most anatomical, procedural, and sonication-related parameters were comparable between FUS1 and FUS2. Final stereotactic targeting during FUS2 showed a small but consistent anterior and dorsal shift relative to FUS1. Lesion volumes measured at both 24 h and 1 month after the procedure did not differ significantly between FUS1 and FUS2, and inter-rater agreement for lesion volumetry was excellent across time points (ICC > 0.91). AEs after FUS2 were predominantly mild and transient. We found no significant differences in lesion volume or inter-side targeting displacement between patients with and without gait disturbances, the most common AE, persisting at 1 month after FUS2. Single-patient imaging analyses suggested heterogeneous spatial lesion configurations in patients with AEs persistent 6–12 months after FUS2.ConclusionIn this single-centre cohort, staged bilateral MRgFUS thalamotomy showed high procedural and radiological consistency between FUS1 and FUS2. MRI-based volumetric analyses show consistent lesion morphology across hemispheres, with small, safety-oriented refinements in second-side targeting, in line with the literature.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.