Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Implementation of cliexa-RA digital platform improved patient experience and time efficiency for 300 rheumatoid arthritis patients.

Implementation of cliexa-RA digital platform improved patient experience and time efficiency for 300…
Photo by CDC / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Note that this single-center pilot shows improved user experience and time efficiency, but does not establish clinical efficacy or generalizable cost savings.

This implementation case study assessed the cliexa-RA digital platform for screening and monitoring patients with rheumatoid arthritis. The study involved 300 patients at the Colorado Arthritis Center and followed them for a six-month period. The intervention compared the digital platform against implied paper forms to evaluate ease of use and workflow efficiency.

Results indicated substantial time savings and high user satisfaction. Average patient intake and self-reporting time was 2.4 minutes, while clinic-reported time for calculation, transcription, and EMR integration was 1 minute plus 10 seconds. Eighty-five percent of patients recommended the forms to other clinicians. On a 1-4 scale, the platform scored an average of 3.57 for ease of use, 3.61 for patient-reported reduction of time spent, 3.50 for ease of understanding, and 3.55 for overall patient satisfaction.

No adverse events, serious adverse events, discontinuations, or tolerability issues were reported. However, cost of care and population health impacts were not immediately available as a result of the pilot study. The study design was a single-center pilot without a control group, meaning results reflect user experience metrics rather than clinical efficacy.

Practice relevance suggests immediate positive impacts on patient experience and physician engagement. Opportunities for cost savings and population health improvements exist through time savings and data collection, though generalizability beyond this specific clinic remains uncertain.

Study Details

Sample sizen = 300
EvidenceLevel 5
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BackgroundResearch supporting the use of digital platforms to increase efficiency in clinical settings has emerged and yet implementation remains a challenge. This can be explained by the unique needs of clinics for data collection and electronic medical record integration. ObjectiveTo identify how screening and monitoring of Rheumatoid Arthritis patients through a customized electronic platform, cliexa-RA impacts patient experience, physician experience, cost of care, and population health based on the Institute for Healthcare Improvements quadruple aim. Methodscliexa-RA was delivered on three tablets at the Colorado Arthritis Center over a six-month period to patients and physicians, who were asked to complete a 16-question intake form allowing patients to score their ability to complete daily tasks using the RAPID3 scoring system, and a six-question patient engagement survey. The physician would then input 28 joint assessment scores following a physical examination. cliexa-RA would then calculate five disease state scores, DAS28 (ESR), DAS28 (CRP), SDAI, CDAI, RAPID3, and send an EMR-compatible PDF file. ResultsTime stamp and patient satisfaction data was collected on 300 patients. Patient intake forms and self-reporting took an average of 2.4 minutes, and clinic-reported time required for calculation and transcription of the data using cliexa-RA was 1 minute with an additional 10 second direct data integration to the EMR after form submission. Eighty-five percent of patients said they would recommend cliexa forms to other clinicians. cliexa-RA scored an average of 3.57 out of 4 when compared to paper in ease of use, 3.61 in patient-reported reduction of time spent, and 3.50 when asked how easy the platform was to understand. Overall patient satisfaction was scored at 3.55 out of 4 and physician experience was measured by the adoption of the program in the study clinic with full integration into the Greenway Health EMR (currently integration is pending). Cost of care and population health impacts were not immediately available as a result of the pilot study; however, numerous savings and improvement opportunities exist as a result of cliexa-RA implementation. ConclusionPatient experience and physician engagement had immediate positive impacts from the implementation of cliexa-RA. Cost of care opportunities exist in both time savings and annual Medicare reporting costs. Population health opportunities exist in the collection of patient data, increasing informed decision making by physicians, as well as in the potential for future RA research using this data.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.