Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

sFlt-1/PIGF ratio demonstrates superior diagnostic accuracy for preeclampsia compared to other serum biomarkersSerum Biomarkers Show Promise for Detecting Preeclampsia

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that the sFlt-1/PIGF ratio shows superior diagnostic accuracy for preeclampsia compared to other serum biomarkers.

This meta-analysis evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of several serum biomarkers, including sFlt-1/PIGF ratio, sFlt-1, PIGF, Endoglin, leptin, Activin A, and inhibin A, for preeclampsia across 22 studies involving 7,772 participants. The analysis aimed to determine which markers provide the most reliable diagnostic performance in pregnant individuals at risk for the condition.

The sFlt-1/PIGF ratio showed superior accuracy compared to other biomarkers, with an overall AUC of 0.923 and a second trimester AUC of 0.94 (sensitivity: 85%, specificity: 83%). Other markers showed moderate performance: sFlt-1 had an AUC of 0.881, PIGF had an AUC of 0.859, while Endoglin and leptin were limited by high heterogeneity (I2 > 75%) with AUCs of 0.814 and 0.768 respectively. Activin A and inhibin A showed preliminary potential with AUCs of 0.785 and 0.796, but these findings are based on only three studies each.

Limitations noted include high heterogeneity for Endoglin and leptin results and a small number of studies for Activin A and inhibin A. Clinical utility is currently strongest for the sFlt-1/PIGF ratio, particularly in the second trimester, while other markers require further validation in larger cohorts.

How this fits prior evidence

This meta-analysis addresses gaps in identifying reliable biomarkers for preeclampsia. It builds upon prior evidence regarding Treg dysregulation in preeclampsia and the conceptual shift toward viewing preeclampsia as a first-trimester villous trophoblast syndrome. While scRNA-seq identified several molecules involved in pathogenesis, this study provides a quantitative comparison of current serum markers, confirming that the sFlt-1/PIGF ratio currently offers superior diagnostic accuracy over other available biomarkers.

Researchers analyzed data from over 7,000 pregnant individuals to evaluate how well different blood markers can identify preeclampsia. This study looked at several markers, including sFlt-1, PIGF, Endoglin, and others, to see which ones were most reliable for diagnosis.

The results showed that the sFlt-1/PIGF ratio had the highest diagnostic accuracy among those tested. It performed particularly well during the second trimester of pregnancy. Other markers like sFlt-1 and PIGF also showed moderate accuracy, while others like Endoglin and leptin were less consistent due to variations in the data.

While these findings are helpful for understanding potential screening tools, some results are still preliminary. For example, the data for Activin A and inhibin A came from very few studies and need more testing before they can be used reliably. These markers show a link to the condition but do not replace clinical judgment.

What this means for you:
The sFlt-1/PIGF ratio shows high accuracy in detecting preeclampsia, especially during the second trimester.

Common questions

Which blood test was most accurate for finding preeclampsia?

The sFlt-1/PIGF ratio showed the highest diagnostic accuracy. It had an area under the curve of 0.923 overall and 0.94 during the second trimester, with a sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 83%.

How accurate are other markers like sFlt-1 or PIGF?

Other markers showed moderate accuracy. The sFlt-1 marker had an area under the curve of 0.881, while PIGF had an area under the curve of 0.859. These results are useful but were not as high as the sFlt-1/PIGF ratio.

Are all blood markers equally reliable for diagnosis?

No, some markers are less consistent. Endoglin and leptin showed moderate performance but had high variability in results. Additionally, Activin A and inhibin A only had three studies each, meaning their potential needs more testing in larger groups.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedAug 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BackgroundPreeclampsia, a life-threatening gestational complication for maternal-fetal health, necessitates prediction (across all trimesters) to improve clinical outcomes. Serum biomarkers, by revealing core pathological mechanisms such as angiogenic imbalance, have emerged as potential screening tools. However, the heterogeneity in their predictive efficacy and clinical utility requires evidence-based synthesis.ObjectiveTo comprehensively evaluate the predictive potential of seven categories of serum biomarkers and clarify their clinical application value.MethodsDatabases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched from inception to January 20, 2026, to identify studies evaluating the diagnostic performance of serum biomarkers for preeclampsia. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated using bivariate random-effects models and the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) model.ResultsA total of 22 studies (7,772 participants) were included. The sFlt-1/PIGF ratio demonstrated the highest diagnostic accuracy, with a pooled sensitivity of 85%, specificity of 83%, and AUC of 0.923. For individual biomarkers, sFlt-1 showed a sensitivity of 78% (95% CI: 74–82%) and specificity of 79% (95% CI: 75–83%) with an AUC of 0.881; PIGF showed a sensitivity of 74% (95% CI: 70–78%) and specificity of 76% (95% CI: 72–80%) with an AUC of 0.859. Endoglin and leptin exhibited moderate diagnostic performance (AUCs of 0.814 and 0.768, respectively) but were limited by high heterogeneity (I2 > 75%). Activin A and inhibin A showed preliminary diagnostic potential (AUCs of 0.785 and 0.796, respectively), but these findings are based on only three studies each and require validation in larger prospective cohorts. Subgroup analysis revealed that diagnostic accuracy varied by gestational trimester, with the sFlt-1/PIGF ratio achieving the highest AUC (0.94) in the second trimester. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the pooled estimates, and publication bias was assessed using Deeks’ funnel plot.ConclusionThis meta-analysis demonstrates that the sFlt-1/PIGF ratio exhibits superior diagnostic accuracy for preeclampsia, particularly during the second trimester.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.