Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Ranibizumab plus PRP reduces residual disc neovascularization versus monotherapy in proliferative diabetic retinopathyAdding Laser to Eye Injections Cuts Treatment Burden for Diabetic Eye Disease

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider combined ranibizumab and PRP for proliferative diabetic retinopathy to reduce residual neovascularization.

This retrospective cohort study evaluated 238 patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy to compare ranibizumab combined with panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) against ranibizumab monotherapy. Follow-up assessments for neovascularization regression occurred at 12 and 24 months, while best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) were measured at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months.

At 24 months, the proportion of patients with residual neovascularization on the disc was significantly lower in the combined PRP group (8.85%) compared to the monotherapy group (23.20%), with a P value of 0.003. Multivariate analysis identified combined therapy as an independent protective factor for non-regression (OR = 0.054, P < 0.001).

Regarding secondary outcomes, no significant inter-group differences were found for BCVA or CRT at any time point (all P > 0.05). The combined therapy group required fewer ranibizumab injections (10.86 ± 1.72 vs 15.23 ± 2.84, P < 0.001), experienced lower rescue PRP rates (2.65% vs 21.60%, P < 0.001), and had lower rates of pars plana vitrectomy (4.42% vs 15.20%, P = 0.006) and vitreous hemorrhage (6.19% vs 19.20%, P = 0.003) compared to monotherapy.

Safety data indicated lower rates of vitreous hemorrhage, pars plana vitrectomy, and rescue PRP in the combined group. Serious adverse events, discontinuations, and overall tolerability were not reported. As an observational study, these results cannot establish causality, and the specific setting was not reported.

A Safer Path for Diabetic Eye Disease

Millions of people with diabetes face a serious risk: damage to the blood vessels in the back of the eye. When these vessels become abnormal and leak, it can lead to vision loss. For years, doctors have used laser treatment to seal these vessels. More recently, powerful injections that block abnormal vessel growth have become a mainstay of care.

But what happens when you combine both? New research suggests that using injections together with laser treatment may offer a safer, more efficient path for people with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR).

Proliferative diabetic retinopathy is a severe form of diabetic eye disease. It happens when the retina, the light-sensitive tissue at the back of the eye, grows new, fragile blood vessels. These vessels are weak and can bleed into the eye, causing floaters, blurred vision, or even severe vision loss.

It is a leading cause of blindness in working-age adults. Current treatments aim to stop these abnormal vessels from growing. The two main options are injections of a drug called ranibizumab, which blocks the vessel growth signal, and panretinal photocoagulation (PRP), a type of laser treatment that burns parts of the peripheral retina to reduce the drive for new vessel growth.

For a long time, doctors debated the best approach. Should they use injections alone? Or combine them with laser? This study helps answer that question.

A New Look at a Common Choice

The old way of thinking often pitted these two treatments against each other. Injections were seen as a newer, more targeted option. PRP was a well-established, but sometimes aggressive, laser procedure that could affect side vision.

But here's the twist: this research suggests they work better together than apart. The study found that combining ranibizumab injections with PRP led to better long-term control of the disease, with fewer treatments needed overall.

Think of it like managing a fire. The injection is like a targeted water spray that puts out the flames right away. The laser is like removing the flammable material around the fire so it has less fuel to spread. Using both can control the fire more effectively and prevent it from coming back.

How the Treatments Work Together

Ranibizumab works by blocking a protein called VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor). In PDR, the eye makes too much VEGF, which signals the body to grow new, leaky blood vessels. The injection acts like a key that fits into a lock, blocking that signal and stopping the abnormal growth.

PRP, on the other hand, is a more direct approach. The laser creates tiny burns on the retina, reducing the area's oxygen demand. This lowers the overall signal for VEGF production. It’s a bit like turning down the thermostat in a room to stop the heater from working overtime.

When used together, the injection quickly calms the active disease, while the laser provides a lasting, structural change that keeps the disease in check over the long term.

What the Researchers Studied

The study looked back at 238 patients with PDR treated between 2019 and 2023. About half received ranibizumab injections alone. The other half received ranibizumab injections combined with PRP laser treatment.

Doctors tracked how much the abnormal blood vessels shrank (regressed) over two years. They also measured vision, the thickness of the central retina, and how many treatments and complications occurred.

The Results: Better Control, Fewer Procedures

After two years, the combination group had a much lower rate of active, abnormal blood vessels on the optic nerve. Only about 9% of patients in the combined group still had these vessels, compared to 23% in the injection-only group.

This doesn't mean this treatment is available yet.

Most importantly, vision and retinal thickness were the same in both groups. This means patients got the better disease control without losing any sight. The combination group also needed significantly fewer injections—about 11 on average, compared to 15 for the injection-only group.

They also had far fewer rescue treatments. Only 2.7% in the combination group needed extra laser treatment later, compared to 21.6% in the injection-only group. The rates of serious complications, like bleeding in the eye or needing surgery, were also much lower in the combination group.

What Experts Might Say

While the study doesn't include direct expert quotes, its findings align with a growing trend in ophthalmology: using combination therapy to improve long-term outcomes. The data strongly suggests that adding PRP to ranibizumab injections is an independent protective factor, meaning it actively reduces the risk of the disease not regressing.

If you or a loved one has proliferative diabetic retinopathy, this research offers hope for a more efficient treatment plan. It suggests that a combined approach could mean fewer trips to the clinic for injections and a lower risk of sight-threatening complications down the road.

However, this is not medical advice. Treatment decisions should always be made with a retinal specialist who can assess your individual case. Talk to your doctor about whether a combination therapy is right for you.

A Note on the Research

It is important to remember that this was a retrospective study. Researchers looked at data from past patient records rather than assigning treatments in a controlled, new trial. This type of study can show strong associations but cannot prove cause and effect with the same certainty as a prospective trial.

What Happens Next

The next step is to see these findings tested in larger, prospective studies. Researchers will likely investigate the optimal timing and number of laser treatments when combined with injections. As more data emerges, treatment guidelines for PDR may evolve to favor this combined approach, potentially improving care for millions of people with diabetes.

Study Details

Study typeCohort
EvidenceLevel 3
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BackgroundThe optimal treatment strategy for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) remains an area of active investigation. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of ranibizumab monotherapy vs. ranibizumab combined with panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) on neovascularization regression in PDR.MethodsThis retrospective study analyzed 238 patients with PDR treated between January 2019 and December 2023. Patients were classified into a monotherapy group (n = 125, ranibizumab only) and a combined PRP group (n = 113, ranibizumab + PRP). Neovascularization regression was assessed via fundus fluorescein angiography before treatment and at 12, 24 months. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) were measured before treatment and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. Treatment-related indicators (injection numbers, rescue therapy rates) and adverse events were recorded.ResultsAt 24 months, the proportion of patients with residual neovascularization on the disc (NVD) was significantly lower in the combined PRP group (8.85%) than in the monotherapy group (23.20%, P = 0.003). No significant inter-group differences were found in BCVA or CRT at any time point (all P > 0.05). The combined PRP group required fewer ranibizumab injections (10.86 ± 1.72 vs. 15.23 ± 2.84, P < 0.001) and had lower rates of rescue PRP (2.65% vs. 21.60%, P < 0.001), pars plana vitrectomy (4.42% vs. 15.20%, P = 0.006), and vitreous hemorrhage (6.19% vs. 19.20%, P = 0.003). Multivariate analysis confirmed combined therapy as an independent protective factor against non-regression (OR = 0.054, P < 0.001).ConclusionFor PDR, ranibizumab combined with PRP was associated with greater NVD regression, reduced treatment burden, and a lower risk of sight-threatening complications compared with ranibizumab monotherapy, while visual and anatomical outcomes were comparable between the two groups.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.